More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
1.77

Awesome: 7.69%
Worth A Look: 7.69%
Average: 7.69%
Pretty Bad: 7.69%
Total Crap69.23%

1 review, 7 user ratings


Latest Reviews

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

Death Note: Light Up the New World by Jay Seaver

Brawl in Cell Block 99 by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed


Christopher Columbus: The Discovery
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Slyder

"It’s a comedy right? Must be, it made me laugh"
1 stars

If there ever was a way to show how NOT to make an epic, you should use this putrid shred of chicken scalp to make your point, though by the end of the film, you would’ve wish not to.

There’s one thing that I’ve got to ask myself, why is it that whenever a crucial moment in history happens or when something out of the ordinary happens in the world, Hollywood tries to cash it in by releasing some of the crappies flicks ever to either “commemorate” or “simulate” or just simply cash on it? They did it in 1992 when it marked the 500th anniversary of the Discovery of America with this moronic crapfest and its competitor, the less shitty though still boring 1492: The Conquest of Paradise. They did it again with the releases of Volcano and Dante’s Peak due to I believe Mt. Pinatubo’s huge eruption in the Philippines back then. And then when that comet passed by Earth in 1996, they brought up more crapfests in the form of Deep Impact and Armageddon. So why?

Anyways, that’s my rant… Oh yeah, I was forgetting that I was reviewing this shitty movie, let me make it simple:

Its utter horse manure; a wannabe epic that paints Christopher Columbus as some womanizing swashbuckling hero (a la Musketeer) which is so idiotically laughable not to mention historically inaccurate; and it doesn’t help that Georges Corraface –who plays Columbus- backs it up with one of the worst performances ever. Somebody should’ve told director John Glen and especially Mario Puzo, John Briley and Carey Bates that THIS WAS NOT A GOD DAMN JAMES BOND MOVIE!!!

But Corraface’s looks like Larry fucking Olivier compared to the utter monstrosity of supporting players, consisting of notable actors behaving like a bunch of moronic jackasses. Tom Selleck as King Ferdinand; what in the blue fuck was that? Marlon Brando as Torquemada; good lord, what a shockingly hideous performance, especially since its Marlon fucking Brando for Christ’s sake! Rachel Ward as Queen Isabella? Don’t even go there. Oh by the way, Catherine Zeta-Jones is here too, just so you know.

Packed with unprecedented levels of dullness and plot components that go from the absolutely ridiculous (what the hell was that greedy knife-wielding Spaniard all about? And why is Christopher Columbus sometimes called Cristobal Colon? Either speak English or Speak Spanish damn it) to the completely atrocious (the mistreating of the natives, and the dreadful ending), this film is such a preposterous waste of celluloid that you’ll wish that the Earth would be actually truly flat and that Columbus’s ship would’ve fallen of the edge in order to spare us from this dimwitted, pointless sack of shit.

And the blame lies right on Hollywood’s door for having a complete lack of respect for the importance of this event, insulting our intelligence throw us this crapfest of a movie that does nothing else but make Christopher Columbus rotate on his grave. Candidate for the worst film of 1992. 0-5

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=10245&reviewer=235
originally posted: 10/17/04 06:53:58
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

9/22/14 Kim Two stars for the only two reasons to watch this: Tailinh Forest Flower (aka Agoyo). 2 stars
1/19/13 PAUL SHORTT ABYSMAL PARADE WITH SOME POOR PERFORMANCES 1 stars
7/15/11 Magic The entire movie is redeemed by Tailinh Forest Flower's talents. Her two pendulous talents. 5 stars
1/22/08 Ariza Tan I'd just like to point out that Cristobal Colon was his name in Spanish. Research it. 3 stars
6/14/07 alex the move is not as bad as every one say's it is if they dont like it go make one ur self ! 4 stars
5/14/06 Sugarfoot I haven't laughed so hard since American Kickboxer 2 !!!! 1 stars
7/21/04 Jack Sommersby The most turgid, unintentionally funny epic since "Tai-Pan". 1 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  21-Aug-1992 (PG-13)

UK
  21-Oct-1992 (PG)

Australia
  21-Oct-1992




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast