More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 13.64%
Worth A Look40.91%
Average: 4.55%
Pretty Bad: 31.82%
Total Crap: 9.09%

2 reviews, 10 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Great Battle, The by Jay Seaver

True Fiction by Jay Seaver

Pick of the Litter by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Peter Sobczynski

House With A Clock In Its Walls, The by Peter Sobczynski

Life Itself (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

Unity of Heroes by Jay Seaver

Hanagatami by Jay Seaver

Predator, The by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Rob Gonsalves

subscribe to this feed

She Hate Me
[] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"Spike Lee: I hate he."
2 stars

The point of Spike Lee's "She Hate Me" seems to be that Spike Lee has made a movie called "She Hate Me." It has a dozen different trains of thought -- everything from homosexuality to politics to race relations to corporate malfeasance -- but none of them ever emerges to become what the movie is "about." As far as I can tell, it's "about" Spike Lee being bombastic and provocative without any particular target.

The protagonist is Jack Armstrong (Anthony Mackie), a bigshot at a biotech company that is on the verge of creating an AIDS vaccine when it is thrown into chaos by charges of illegal activity. The whistleblower is Jack himself, which his bosses (played by Ellen Barkin and Woody Harrelson, in a particularly, um, wooden performance) repay by making him their scapegoat, even though he had actually done nothing wrong. An investigation begins, and Jack's assets are frozen by the government -- no small thing, considering he's been living the lifestyle of a fabulously wealthy New York City bachelor.

It is during this time of financial hardship that Jack is approached by his ex-girlfriend Fatima (Kerry Washington), now a lesbian living with her girlfriend Alex (Dania Ramirez). Fatima and Alex want the thrill of being pregnant together, so they're offering Jack $5,000 each to impregnate them. He's still in love with Fatima, so fathering her child the, uh, old-fashioned way brings complicated emotions with it. But he's also desperate for income. A deal is struck.

Fatima, entrepreneur that she is, soon brings a parade of lesbians to Jack's door, each offering $10,000 (minus Fatima's finder's fee) for Jack to have sex with them and make them into mothers. They come in groups of six or eight and ask Jack questions to put their minds at ease. At one point, they make him strip naked so they can see what they're getting. One of them actually says, "Now you know what it's like to be a sexual object," a powerful reminder that when it comes to social commentary, Lee and "subtlety" are not on speaking terms.

The story of a man paid to impregnate lesbians is certainly fraught with possibilities, both comic and otherwise, and the parts of the film that focus on it are better than the rest. But then Lee tries to inject too many other elements. All the business with Jack's company's Enron-like dealings serve no apparent purpose other than to show that Lee is ANGRY! about SOMETHING! but I don't know what. Greedy corporations? OK, fine. So what? Being angry about that is old news. Make a statement about it, shed some light on it, put a twist on it, make jokes about it. Just DO something with it, ANYTHING.

Even within the pregnant-lesbians thread, Lee goes off on tiresome tangents, including a subplot about Jack's connection with a Mafia family via their lesbian daughter, and some kitchen-sink melodrama regarding Fatima and Alex's relationship.

It becomes absurdly political in the final act, with Jack testifying before Congress about his former employers, and then it becomes just plain absurd, with a resolution between Jack and the lesbians that is utterly preposterous. Is Lee satirizing something? Is this all a metaphor for something? Or is it just a heavy-handed mess, full of non-sequiturs (like George W. Bush's face on a three-dollar bill during the opening credits)? My vote is for the latter.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 11/01/04 13:38:45
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

8/28/10 mr.mike The black lezzies are hot ; the movie is lame. 2 stars
6/05/09 NikkiStacks the movie is Weird and doesnt make sence but i dont like spike lee neway 4 stars
4/14/09 FrankNFurter Spike Lee is homophobic, racist & misogynistic & this film is a testament to that! 1 stars
10/12/06 chandra the movie was gross and disgusting. This makes me want to boycott Spike Lee, he needs Jesus 1 stars
1/09/06 Agent Sands Spike Lee never ever ever bores me, even with a flop. This is a riveting, ambitious epic. 5 stars
9/07/05 malcolm some classic moments, but pretty preposterous. too much going on at once. 3 stars
8/06/05 Zack Quite underrated 5 stars
7/07/05 Isaac Baranoff Underrated 5 stars
2/27/05 axe creative social commentary that never finds its voice 4 stars
1/30/05 gina rabsatt unbelievable, didnt end the way i thought,good though, i would watch it again 4 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  28-Jul-2004 (R)
  DVD: 01-Feb-2005



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast