More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 7.69%
Worth A Look: 11.54%
Average: 17.31%
Pretty Bad61.54%
Total Crap: 1.92%

6 reviews, 16 user ratings

Latest Reviews

True Fiction by Jay Seaver

Pick of the Litter by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Peter Sobczynski

House With A Clock In Its Walls, The by Peter Sobczynski

Life Itself (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

Unity of Heroes by Jay Seaver

Hanagatami by Jay Seaver

Predator, The by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Rob Gonsalves

Madeline's Madeline by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Vanity Fair
[] Buy posters from this movie
by Laura Kyle

"Red hair dye does not mean Reese isn't still legally, blond."
3 stars

Based on the William Thackeray novel, VANITY FAIR hardly stars Reese Witherspoon as the film's cold heroine, but rather the early 19th Century, as seen through the keen eyes of director Mira Nair.

Witherspoon is Becky Sharp, a woman determined to break into the socialite club of English Nobility, despite the fact that she comes from a poor background. With her beauty, wit, and lovely singing voice, she manages to charm her way up the social ladder. Her best friend, Amelia (played by Romola Garai), while just as enraptured in vain dreams, idolizing a solider husband who has no love for her, is a far weaker character, shedding light on Becky's intense independence and ambition. Witherspoon gives Becky a mischievous and likeable quality that is absolutely necessary for the audience to invest in her, and still comes off as a detached, fiercely autonomous individual who will do anything to get what she wants, even sacrifice love. Sadly though, Witherspoon falls somewhat short of grasping Becky's entire essence, failing to show any vulnerability. Not to mention, to no fault of her own, the fact that her pregnant belly could not be completely hidden when it was supposed to be, certainly took away from her credibility.

While Vanity Fair is often captivating, it is a noticeably long picture, with a whopping running time of about two and a half hours. Suffice it to say, if you take a bathroom break, you won't be lost as to what is going on upon your return. Tack on the fact that the film is a relatively subdued character driven tale of well, vanity, and is so underscored with reality, it is hard to get incredibly excited while watching it.

However, Vanity Fair is clever and often funny, with colorful characters and scenery, vibrant costumes that will probably give the film an Oscar nod, a strong music score, excellent cinematography, and a timeless theme that is all too relevant for today. For this, a tedious pace can be forgiven. Perhaps if Nair had not been so distracted by the grandness of Thackery's plot and players or the historical context of it all, she could have focused more on Becky as the film's centerpiece (even though it has been said her interpretation of Thackeray's Becky was overly sympathetic), creating a more interesting drama requiring less patience from the movie-goer.

However, those who found quiet and intelligent films like Girl with a Pearl Earring to be satisfying, will probably appreciate Vanity Fair's reliance on the historical time period, as well as underplayed acting.

One of the more upbeat performances is given by Eileen Atkins, playing a high society elder, who is one of the first to notice Becky's rare street smarts and potential. However, as the movie later demonstrates, all the intelligence, talent, and manners in the world scarcely compensate for a lack of pedigree or wealth. This idea is essentially the core of Vanity Fair, but still the film plays primarily as a period piece, because that is where Nair's strengths as a filmmaker lie.

Witherspoon subtly blends into the background of early 1800's Society and Nobility in London. Although her acting is bold and generally effective, it is truly the era and the cast as a whole, that defines VANITY FAIR.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 09/12/04 02:43:13
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

8/22/08 black_queen_marches Becky Sharpe was way too nice, unlike the book; that made it boring 3 stars
2/09/06 Riki Started Strong then...what happened? 3 stars
10/29/05 Jackeline Rodriguez Awesome, great, spectacular 5 stars
4/29/05 reptilesni Well done. Very interestingly told story. 4 stars
4/17/05 Crap Crap Biggest Crap of the Year 1 stars
3/29/05 alana klatt 4 stars
2/17/05 Kathleen4691 Not really my type of film, but better than I expected 4 stars
1/27/05 Graham A fine, imaginative adaptation that just needed more of a sting. 3 stars
10/25/04 me it was great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 5 stars
9/24/04 vickel dimpson I enjoyed the movie very much. 5 stars
9/21/04 linda A gorgeous film, but 30 minutes too long; much of Thackery's irony and wit is missing. 4 stars
9/19/04 k bar uh...there was a parrot..that was good i guess..... 2 stars
9/10/04 m_graham Not the book, but not bad. Beauty/decay, virtue/vice, innocence/hypocrisy: a fine mixture. 4 stars
9/07/04 Heather Definitely one to look out for, and no, Reese is not "miscast" 5 stars
9/04/04 Ray Lame 2 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  01-Sep-2004 (PG-13)
  DVD: 01-Feb-2005



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast