More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.89

Awesome: 0%
Worth A Look: 0%
Average88.89%
Pretty Bad: 11.11%
Total Crap: 0%

1 review, 3 user ratings



Mummy's Tomb, The
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by MP Bartley

"Not so creaky."
3 stars

It's always gratifying to see a sequel learn from the mistakes of its predecessor.

Not many films manage to do that, so kudos to Harold Young and everyone else behind the follow up to The Mummy's Hand.

That's not to say this is a great film, far from it. The dialogue is lousy, the acting practically non-existent and for a 60 minute film, is spending the first 10 ten minutes recapping the last one really such a good idea?

But at least it gives us straightaway what the previous Mummy entry took 40 minutes to do - some actual Mummy action. (Spoilers abound from now on, for those who care about such things in a cheap-o throwaway Universal monster flick). It turns that out George Zucco's mysterious priest from The Mummy's Hand is alive and well, and dispatches Karis (Lon Chaney in some effective make up) to America to kill those who defiled his tomb 30 years ago.

The notion of the Mummy slowly stalking its prey and strangling them while they remain petrified to the spot is still an inherently stupid one, but at least here it happens so often that the film is rarely boring. Instead, it's much more bloodthirsty than the previous entry and it deserves credit for killing off every returning cast member - quite a ballsy move that I approve of.

There's a great moment of unintentional humour when a bad guy is killed by a member of the public with barely a shrug from anyone - apparently it's OK to kill people who haven't been proved guilty of anything as long as they're foreign. Dodgy racial politics aside, there's actually some skill behind the camera here. It looks genuinely creepy at times, and Young makes good use of the dark, creepy shadows of the estate where the principal characters gathered, as they try to figure out why elderly members of their family are being bumped off mysteriously. It's this skill that makes the fiery climax of the film genuinely quite impressive.

Look, it's nowhere near a forgotten classic. But considering what came before it, it's the Citizen Kane of mummy movies.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=11060&reviewer=293
originally posted: 09/17/11 21:14:10
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

12/05/11 Pamela White I love old horror but could be better 3 stars
7/24/11 The Big D Follow-up to the Mummy's Hand, it loses the humorous elements but has a weaker plot. 3 stars
10/25/05 tatum The best of the original sequels, which ain't saying much 2 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  23-Oct-1942
  DVD: 19-Oct-2004

UK
  N/A

Australia
  02-Mar-1943


Directed by
  Harold Young

Written by
  Griffin Jay
  Henry Sucher

Cast
  Dick Foran
  John Hubbard
  Elyse Knox
  George Zucco
  Lon Chaney Jr.
  Wallace Ford



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast