More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.29

Awesome: 16.18%
Worth A Look33.82%
Average: 23.53%
Pretty Bad: 16.18%
Total Crap: 10.29%

5 reviews, 38 user ratings


Latest Reviews

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

Death Note: Light Up the New World by Jay Seaver

Brawl in Cell Block 99 by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed


Hostage (2005)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Jay Seaver

"At least Bruce Willis isn't in full-on sleepwalking mode."
3 stars

I'm getting old. That's the only way I can explain it. I have lived sufficiently long that when confronted by a movie like Hostage, I don't find the action much fun any more. I look at it and think putting kids in danger is kind of tacky. I just generally do and think all sorts of generally old-fartsy things.

As formula thrillers go, Hostage isn't bad at all, I guess. It's got a snazzy title sequence, slick production values, and a star in Bruce Willis who is more than capable of elevating standard material. It needs another star, though - there's no bad guy who seems worthy of pulling Willis's strings. Indeed, the next-biggest star (Kevin Pollack) spends most of the movie unconscious. It means that a thriller that should be a game of cat and mouse is short a small mammal, someone who seems like a legit threat to beat Willis's character, at least within a movie.

The structure will seem familiar early. Jeff Talley (Willis) is L.A.'s top hostage negotiator, but after a disastrous standoff that leaves the shooter's wife and son dead, he takes a job as the chief of police in a small, low-crime community. His wife tries to be understanding, but his daughter hates it. Soon, though, a group of teens stage a home invasion, knocking out the single father who may have a less-than-reputable source of income (Pollack), and when the police respond to the burglar alarm, they take the kids hostage - and just by coincidence, the girl is the same age as Talley's daughter, while the boy is the same age as the kid killed in the opening segment. Talley turns it over to the state police, but when the father's employers kidnap Talley's family, he's forced to re-insert himself into the situation.

Thrillers don't necessarily need a strong villain, but having one can't hurt. The hostage-taking kids don't qualify; in order of descending threateningness, they're a nasty but not terribly bright sociopath in training (Ben Foster), a not terribly bright punk kid (Jonathan Tucker), and his not terribly bright or particularly enthused about causing trouble little brother (Marshall Allman). Though the mountain house they're occupying is a veritable fortress, they're not going to present much of a challenge; they can't even be bothered to actually watch their hostages most of the time. So it's almost a relief when the mob guys show up; they at least might have some brains. Unfortunately, methodical as they are, they don't really have much in terms of means of keeping an eye on Talley, and it's kind of frustrating that doesn't do more to counter them while they're not looking. They're also faceless and lacking any sort of charisma; even if they're got the resources to win this game, the audience is never really that worried, because they don't rank near Willis on the Hollywood pecking order.

(I know we're not supposed to think about such things, but we do. You pay your $7.50, you notice whose name comes before the title and whose names come after it, and you know that one movie star can only be defeated by another.)

Though the villains aren't terribly competent, the filmmakers not involved in writing those villains, by and large, are. Sure, they go for the cheap "well, you know they're evil because they hurt a cute dog" moment, but they do build a nice set piece or two. Scenes meant to be suspenseful generally are, though they could have been more so if every character's IQ was increased by ten points or so.

The writing just tends to stink. I was all set to give it credit early on when Pollack's character gets pistol-whipped and the movie portrays it as an actual serious head injury. That's the last bit of flirting with credibility that the movie will undertake, unfortunately. There's a lot of stupid to be done after that, from apparently indestructible villains, nebbishy civilians (with serious head injuries) successfully engaging in gunplay, and the aforementioned bizarre plans. Talley doesn't disobey the folks who've taken his family hostage in little ways they won't detect that may gain him an advantage, but when in big ways that they'll be able to see on TV. It's irritating.

The cast is OK. Bruce Willis doesn't give his full "good script and director who's not going to settle for half-assed" best, but he doesn't mail it in, either. He's got a good moment of looking pained as he asks a ten year old kid to do something dangerous, and I wish we'd seen more of that from him. Ben Foster gives decent psycho, and Jimmy Bennett manages to sell his hyper-competent kid.

Director Florent Emilio Siri (whose credits mostly seem to be videogame cut scenes) handles the choreography well enough, but he misses the fun. Sure, it's a grim situation, but it's not thrilling like a thriller should be. The hairs on the back of my neck never stand up. He can't convince us to move up in our seats a little because we're thinking ooh, that's a clever move; I wonder what Bruce/the faceless bad guys will do to counter it.

It's not a bad movie; the filmmakers don't actually screw up an inherently suspenseful situation. Neither, however, do they grab us and create the burning need to see what's going to happen next.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=11793&reviewer=371
originally posted: 04/04/05 09:06:07
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

2/06/10 MJ Good film. Can't beleve the critics hated it! 4 stars
7/27/09 asdkljfsdklasjd Well, its a movie, and I watched it for entertainment. 5 stars
8/13/08 Shaun Wallner Awesome storyline! 5 stars
1/29/08 R.W.Welch Overplotted & overwrought, but plenty of action. 3 stars
6/05/06 Jon Great, but you know that they're trying too hard when the kids start swearing >_< 4 stars
4/01/06 ES Ben Foster shoould have won an oscar here. PS Rumor is not hot in the least 4 stars
3/26/06 chris f very good tense film 4 stars
3/03/06 Tanya enjoyed it bruce willis is always good 4 stars
9/15/05 MatthewL Takes itself too seriously, could have been fun, not a drop dead yawn 2 stars
9/05/05 RickyBoy Insulting and embarrassing piece of Hollywoodish excrement. 1 stars
8/23/05 Indrid Cold Enough "surprises" so that we haven't seen it all before, but nothing to write home about. 3 stars
8/17/05 Agent Sands Seriously underrated. Great comeback for Bruce Willis. 4 stars
7/28/05 Monday Morning Above-avg. excitement but got a bit too outlandish 4 stars
7/22/05 tony I thought it was ok. But why the hell is bruce willis still doing this junk 2 stars
7/20/05 Dan Good movie 4 stars
7/04/05 mariann Don't read the jacket...just watch it and get ready to be engrossed from start to finish! 5 stars
7/02/05 Captain Craig Willis promoting himself as a super-hero.Pistols in faces , blood and gore.What`s new? 2 stars
7/02/05 Beth Lots of action. Love Bruce Willis, but ditch the transparent Steven Seagal script next time 3 stars
6/29/05 Alysia awesome movie 5 stars
6/26/05 Jeff Anderson Tense & completely well made. Willis & Foster are great, but Pollak's very badly wasted. 4 stars
6/24/05 tatum Ugly, over the top actioner; straight to video like script 2 stars
5/05/05 Christy Schultz Wasn't what I expected, but still really liked it. 4 stars
4/18/05 Critic Shut Up Haven't seen Willis for Ages 5 stars
4/18/05 ALBERT Wait.is it a critic? 4 stars
4/17/05 David Very nice, ending too fast 4 stars
4/11/05 Bing Ending was awesome, the rest was normal 4 stars
3/29/05 malcolm pretty much the same role willis has been doing since die hard, and i like him doing it 4 stars
3/29/05 Obi Wan Very good action thriller....not too cliched, Willis back to form! 5 stars
3/25/05 jcjs fun mix, different than usual fare 5 stars
3/25/05 RIY L. CAIN JR. Bruce Willis, back in the action saddle. Yippee Ki Yay ! 5 stars
3/23/05 Jack Bourbon Bruce has played this part approximately 900 times 3 stars
3/23/05 Victoria Ross I love Bruce Willis movies 4 stars
3/22/05 Kevin Rose a good movie. 4 stars
3/22/05 xxplosive Great move, willis was ace. 5 stars
3/21/05 Elizabeth S Very disappointing; cliched, and Jonathan Tucker gives an awful performance. 2 stars
3/15/05 OC-SurfGirl Liked it. 4 stars
3/12/05 Ando This movie was sweet! 5 stars
3/11/05 mott the drupal but where are david prowse's boobs? 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  11-Mar-2005 (R)
  DVD: 21-Jun-2005

UK
  N/A

Australia
  14-Apr-2005




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast