More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.92

Awesome: 6.52%
Worth A Look34.24%
Average: 25.54%
Pretty Bad: 12.5%
Total Crap: 21.2%

13 reviews, 106 user ratings


Latest Reviews

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

Death Note: Light Up the New World by Jay Seaver

Brawl in Cell Block 99 by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed


Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, The
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Marc Kandel

"I’m of two heads on this one."
4 stars

As a member in good standing of the third most intelligent species on the planet, I’ve a few thoughts on the subject of this film… But the mice retain final editing privileges.

So it’s not the book. Let’s get that little tidbit out of the way. It’s a tidy, neatly encapsulated story with a beginning, middle, and, unlike the book, a resolved ending with just enough references squeezed in to leave the remote possibility of a sequel to narrowly avoid a rabid Douglas Adams Fan riot. It’s an adaptation that gives the impression of a very clinical discussion around a studio conference table by writers and producers desperate to find a way to illustrate yet restrain Adams’ delicious, unpredictable narrative style and breakout tangents in a way that adequately brings a story across to viewers both new and old to the “Hitchhiker’s” world.

The finished product won’t be a hardcore fan pleaser, but as a standalone film it’s good enough for government work. Its also important to note that prior to his death, Adams was involved with this screenplay, so some changes were obviously approved by him for purposes of book to film adaptation- something for die-hards (and myself) to take note of.

Plot- a refugee from a destroyed earth joins a madcap band of adventurers in the search for the question of Life the Universe and Everything. Hilarity ensues.

I consider myself something of a Douglas Adams fan. Okay, perhaps a “Hitchhiker’s” fan as the “Dirk Gently” novels didn’t leave as large an impression with me. Despite more than a few exceptions taken with this cinematic adaptation overall, we have a pretty entertaining, funny film that I find, well, sweet, a word I have prior to now, never utilized in a review to describe my reaction to a film. So let me clarify: I mean sweet in a good, Douglas Adams, life is a horrifically bitched up exercise in random Hobbesian unpleasantness and more than occasional futility but hey, there’s sandwiches and puppies—and that’s something, isn’t it? kind of way.

Think of the film as a Readers Digest Douglas Adams. No. No don’t do that. How ‘bout, “The Compleat and Unabridged Hitchhiker’s Guide Cliff Notes 2005 Edition?” No? Ok. Ok. Then let’s stick with “We thought we’d have a go at making this movie about this book, but the prose, imagery, and non-traditional point of view will forever prove itself beyond our limited two- to three-dimensional perception so here’s an amalgamation of the aforementioned items we hope you’ll like, and aren’t all these pretty flashing lights and rubber aliens with large protuberant lips something?”

And because they stick with the latter proposition, in addition to assembling a very fun, talented cast, the film does manage to offer a glimpse of Adams’ world view and humor, if not his actual story. For new audiences, its pretty original, intelligent material to be found at your atypical theater with some great visuals and vaguely Monty Pythonesque humor and for the novel’s fans, well, for the more open-minded, it can be a mixed bag of fun and disappointment weighing more heavily on the fun side. For stiff-necked die-hards, well, sorry, it’s probably going to lead to hours of blogging vitriol. For me, it’s just enough to get by with a wide grin, and it’s not even close to what I would consider a bad movie. In fact, I felt quite good by its conclusion. Folks that can live with this assessment need read no further.

So for the nitpickers, let’s take a look at a few of what could be considered some of the more egregious wrongdoings amongst a great host of changes:

The film changes the whole tone of the book by making the tale about Arthur Dent’s personal journey and individual growth rather than using Arthur Dent as the everyman perspective in an abnormal situation, observing, but never really becoming an effectual character in and of himself. Here, Arthur is transformed into the active protagonist with lessons to learn and changes to be made in his life by the end credits in classic screenplay 101 mode.

Because of the aforementioned change of focus, a heretofore nonexistent love story has been included, ostensibly for the bean counters and audiences that for some reason need to know the main character will fuck, or have the opportunity to fuck something off-screen in the future, resulting in a big fuck you to adherents to the original source material, where no such love story exists, and indeed, is not really essential to the overall plot.

A major character possessing two heads has this particular physical attribute toned down (the heads are positioned vertically rather than horizontally, resulting in the character looking pretty much like everyone else most of the time). Why? The end justification is shaky, and removing the weird apparition immediately ruins the observational comedy of the English tendency to nonchalantly accept the bizarre with nary a raised eyebrow in the interests of maintaining proper gentlemanly composure. It is a wasted opportunity and a real irritating break from the original idea. Plus, I liked the old television mini-series where Zaphod’s other head was a barely functional puppet that looked like an exhumed Neanderthal with a mullet poorly stapled to the actor’s shoulder and came alive only to mutter some slow witticism, then returning to inert matter for the rest of the shot. But that’s me.

A major event at the beginning of the movie is book ended with a restoration of status quo at the end of the movie- that this event is shown to have never actually happened in later books in the series is incidental- here, its classic circular storytelling.

Why the problems are forgivable if not forgettable:

The subtle tinkering with the Arthur Dent character from our identifiable fly-on-the-wall to space opera hero is probably necessary for the more limiting medium, and an excellent turn by Martin Freeman as the generally hapless, clueless Arthur Dent helps greatly, never making him more capable than he actually is, but allowing him to deal with situations as best as possible while still being, well…Arthur Dent.

The cast as a whole make many of these changes work by giving us honest, energetic performances that made me believe in the actions and motivations of the characters. Mos Def, Sam Rockwell, and Zooey Deschanel all make these characters step right out of the book. Of the three, I was most concerned with Mos Def, as I have never seen him in a film role and only vaguely know him as some hip-hop celebrity, but he won me over immediately when his character, Ford Prefect attempts to shake hands with an oncoming vehicle. Winner. Sam Rockwell of course gives us yet another memorable character performance as Zaphod Beeblebrox, coming off as a mildly retarded Elvis impersonator who has gotten by in life with tremendous charisma and ambition that outweighs his attention span. Zooey Deschanel brings a likeable quality to the character I found least likable in the books. Her Trillian is clever, adventurous, adept, sexy, and a better heroine than most despite the film’s obvious fallback tactic of making her the damsel in distress- another divergence some may take issue with.

Said changes are threaded into the storyline competently, if not satisfactorily with acceptable rationales for the goings-on; there is even a perfectly intelligent… um… perfectly justifiable…let’s just say there is a reason for the alteration with Zaphod’s head(s) that I can live with, if not totally sanction.

I hardly see a studio greenlighting “The Restaurant at the End of the Universe” sequel without having tested the waters of how your average audience will enjoy this first offering. It’s a well-known story, but doesn’t really pack the historical clout of a “Lord of the Rings”, or the overt flashiness of a “Matrix” trilogy (though decidedly more innovative and intelligent than the latter- but in the case of “Hitchhiker’s”, that may ironically be the problem).

So if you can’t abide the heretical tinkering with the source, go back to the TV series, or even better, the radio show, or better than that and most obviously, the book itself. But you’ll miss the fabulous musical number… I still hum it on occasion...

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=11932&reviewer=358
originally posted: 11/11/05 09:56:30
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

12/24/15 brian If you have no expectations, it's nice lightweight fun. 4 stars
10/08/14 me worth a look 4 stars
7/28/12 Silkworm Dreadful rubbish - Just ask revolving Douglas !! 1 stars
2/15/12 Ron Larson Enjoyable, good cast 4 stars
5/14/11 Chipzsz First time i couldn't understand s**it, after reading the book is excellent, specially Marv 5 stars
6/14/10 LINDA DOWDY Hard to follow story line...was there a story line? 2 stars
6/09/10 Harvey Scott Fun but see the English version first. 3 stars
1/27/09 Shaun Wallner Very Interesting 4 stars
9/07/08 Samantha Pruitt did a good job re-telling the book, the effects were great! 4 stars
12/16/07 Jason The TV show sucked, this was only marginally better. 3 stars
5/20/07 fools♫gold Damn funny at times and even thoughtful. Seaver knows... 4 stars
4/18/07 Stevo UK Watching Harry Potter suck his cock is more tolerable than this. 1 stars
2/20/07 Beau literally one of the worst overrated movies i have ever seen, utterly pointless crap 1 stars
1/05/07 Don't see the movie, read the book please please please read the excellent book and don't judge it by this crap 1 stars
1/02/07 Jamie I actually thought that is was a decent movie, ya'll need to shutup, if you don't like it.. 5 stars
11/14/06 Matt Read the book, then dont waste ur time on the movie 2 stars
10/10/06 Diana Starts out great, slowly gets worse, the end is terrible and sugary (PS- READ THE BOOK) 3 stars
9/02/06 Chad Thomas Okay... not great! 3 stars
6/05/06 Pete Smith Utter rubbish. Watch the BBC TV version instead. 1 stars
5/21/06 millersxing Sci-fi silliness. I'm no more likely to read the book than before. 3 stars
5/19/06 drydock54321 kind of dull 2 stars
3/30/06 alley brauwnstine 5 stars
3/13/06 Roderick Cromar Very disappointing. A wasted opportunity. Poor value. 2 stars
2/12/06 adamathwaxman you all are styupid. this is the best film in years.pick yourself with a sharp object. 4 stars
1/24/06 Michael Shaw If anyone thinks this movie was worth watcvhing they should get their head examined 1 stars
1/20/06 Mike Pulido Boy this movie sucked! 1 stars
1/18/06 DARIJA VAN HOUTEN IT WAS OK, BUT I'VE SEEN BETTER 3 stars
1/15/06 Perry Mason nice opening, down hill from there. 2 stars
12/14/05 deadfishrman maybe I just need to watch it again for 1 more star 3 stars
12/03/05 Jennifer S. Martin Freeman is pretty good in this, but Zooey Deschanel is her usual annoying self. 3 stars
11/13/05 cypress wasn't too impressed, expected more from this one 2 stars
10/27/05 East Asian Piss Fairly Good 4 stars
10/25/05 daveyt not worthy of the title... absolutely butchered 2 stars
10/09/05 Anus Adams is rolling in his grave. 1 stars
10/07/05 Chris Knight I was open mouthed it was so dreadful 1 stars
10/03/05 CaDizzle Don't judge the book by this movie, book is millions of times better 2 stars
9/27/05 rafi I actually liked it alot , fun movie! 5 stars
9/20/05 Vaughan What a disappointment, they ruined the jokes! 2 stars
9/19/05 Jonathon Holmes dogshit 1 stars
9/15/05 Tom Burns Not a great movie, but the scenery is pretty cool. 3 stars
9/06/05 chrissy b absolute rubbish - dire remake - why bother 1 stars
8/12/05 zaw is this movie based on a piece of crap book or what? 1 stars
8/09/05 Glagg Just not interesting or funny enough, gives book an undeserved bad rep. 2 stars
8/06/05 Zack DON'T PANIC! 5 stars
8/05/05 Kathy terPlugg Wasting away again in MAGRATHEAville 2 stars
7/22/05 Seen the movie, TOTALLY regretted it The movie was a REMAKE of Penis Spaceship movie of the 1960'70s 1 stars
7/09/05 Rebecca It implies the book itself is a piece of shit. It isn't. 3 stars
7/03/05 Eddie DUMBEST PIECE OF RANCID ANTI-CHRIST SHIT! 1 stars
6/28/05 Joe Pesci The film is crap. BUT READ THE BOOK - ITS AMAZINGLY GREAT. 1 stars
6/24/05 Eric Rollins The mini-series is so superior, skip this mess 2 stars
6/19/05 Sean Lane Awesome alternative to the regular garbage derivations. Didn't read the book. 4 stars
6/11/05 Krisan Graves what did i just watch? 3 stars
6/11/05 Captain Craig The only move I ever walked out on! A waist of money all around. dont bother! 1 stars
6/09/05 elpintogrande ADAMS ROLLING IN HIS GRAVE 1 stars
6/05/05 Ubu the Ripper Failed Disney attempt to cash in on pre-Star Wars hype. A true waste of film and my $10. 1 stars
6/04/05 Denise Gannon i loved the opening theme, but too much pointless chatting amongst charactors. 3 stars
6/04/05 Hack-SAW Don't know what to say about this... 3 stars
5/27/05 chris. this is what fans of the book like myself have been waiting for????? 3 stars
5/23/05 Green Gremlin Not as good as the classic BBC series, but still fun to watch 4 stars
5/22/05 Cham Book was pretty funny, but this is just plain bad. 1 stars
5/21/05 Tom Biegel Boring 2 stars
5/17/05 ad good for kids 3 stars
5/17/05 Hannah INSANITY!!! Don't see it in theaters...unless you are drunk! 1 stars
5/15/05 Bluto I wanted to like it so much, good visuals, thats about it 3 stars
5/14/05 MF A fun, if not wierd, movie that pales in compraison to the books. 3 stars
5/12/05 mwr truly awful, awkward and ugly - I fell asleep 1 stars
5/12/05 Jeff Baugh Read the books, seen the TV series, and heard the radio show. My rating? *****/***** 5/5 4 stars
5/12/05 Tyrantis The most entertaining film I've seen this year. 5 stars
5/12/05 maxomai Not the book. Who cares? Loved it. 5 stars
5/11/05 X worth the line wait 5 stars
5/10/05 nikki definately worth a look 5 stars
5/09/05 Snickerdoodle Weird in a good way, and very imaginative 4 stars
5/09/05 zeitgeist WTF is with the love story sub-plot? It ruined it. Stick to the book, kids 3 stars
5/07/05 Harry Knowles WORST. MOVIE. EVER. (ok, maybe not - battlefield earth holds that spot) 1 stars
5/07/05 Sir Spam-a-lot If only they had this kinda budget w/ the 1981 BBC Miniseries... 3 stars
5/06/05 KingNeutron Worst. Zaphod. EVAR. 2 stars
5/05/05 Christy Schultz Well, I have never read the book, but it was funny in some places, very stupid in others 2 stars
5/05/05 Ethan Acres Screenplay obviously written by Vogons 2 stars
5/05/05 ZF better than expected, very funny, great production design 4 stars
5/05/05 marya appalling, tripe, awful, unwarranted, Dear God, don't let them make a sequel! 1 stars
5/04/05 Integral Retarded, aimless, pointless, dull, WANT MY MONEY BACK!!! 1 stars
5/04/05 tmcmistress Lowtax: THINK. Idea-smiting shovels. on Vogon. Makes perfect sense. Well-done movie. 4 stars
5/04/05 Whatevr cool 5 stars
5/04/05 Mike Prentice Walked out after 40 minutes AND got my money back 1 stars
5/03/05 Aaron Smith Awful 1 stars
5/03/05 elpintogrande A pathetic attempt at forced humour. 1 stars
5/03/05 Tom Felt way more depressed than Marvin could ever be 1 stars
5/03/05 Lowtax So what was all that shovel face slapping time wasting crap about? 1 stars
5/03/05 Tommy It doesn't do justice to the book or to the fans. 1 stars
5/03/05 Anus HUGE STEAMING PILE OF BOREDOM. A DISGRACE TO THE BOOK 1 stars
5/02/05 jcjs loved it 5 stars
5/02/05 Elizabeth S Not very amusing; only enjoyed Rickman's excellent voice work. 2 stars
5/02/05 bullit16 What was laugh-out-loud funny in the book, just wasn't on the screen 3 stars
5/02/05 Teri SILLY 3 stars
5/02/05 Rageim Support the movie ,Maybe get better in next movie. 4 stars
5/02/05 Richard Sucked 1 stars
5/02/05 Dorothy Malm not bad but movies are rarely as good as the book 4 stars
5/02/05 Joe Buss Pretty funny 4 stars
5/01/05 herrinfamily none 3 stars
5/01/05 John Bale Strong supporting cast and Jim Hanson's monsters help this space satire 4 stars
5/01/05 Darren Shea Good, but not great. Likely to be a letdown if you've memorized the books,or other versions 4 stars
5/01/05 The Grinch Pretty damned good for 2 hours...I don't think Joe Moviegoer could've handled 3 hrs.. 4 stars
5/01/05 Titus Better than I feared, not as good as I hoped. Chuckle-worthy, not much more. 3 stars
4/30/05 Mahone Sucks beyond belief. Effects budget can't hide terrible effort. 1 stars
4/30/05 Gray tI could have been better but not much 4 stars
4/29/05 David M Rosonowski Played off elements from the radioplay, TV series and book. Loved it. 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  29-Apr-2005 (PG-13)
  DVD: 13-Sep-2005

UK
  N/A

Australia
  28-Apr-2005




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast