More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.09

Awesome: 1.43%
Worth A Look: 21.43%
Average: 1.43%
Pretty Bad: 35.71%
Total Crap40%

8 reviews, 22 user ratings


Latest Reviews

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

Death Note: Light Up the New World by Jay Seaver

Brawl in Cell Block 99 by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed


Must Love Dogs
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by brianorndorf

"Diane Lane keeps this out of the kennel"
4 stars

While it features moments of unbelievable romantic comedy tripe, “Must Love Dogs” wins out in the end with strong characterizations, and a literary adaptation that doesn’t crumble into a million pieces. Anchored by Diane Lane’s sturdy, wonderful performance, “Dogs” is mild but winning and entertaining.

Recently divorced and terrified of the dating scene, Sarah (Diane Lane) is unwilling to meet new men, even with the almost psychotic pushing from her large family (including Elizabeth Perkins and loose, charming Christopher Plummer). Dipped into the online dating pool against her will, Sarah meets Jake (John Cusack), another victim of divorce who is just as reluctant to date. The two hit it off, but so do Sarah and Bob (Dermot Mulroney), leaving Jake unsure where he stands. Finding two men she likes for the first time in a long time, Sarah must figure out what to do with her suddenly new found love life.

Only in Hollywood would people make movies about how Diane Lane has trouble finding dates.

Almost a companion piece to her incredible work in 2003’s “Under the Tuscan Sun,” “Must Love Dogs” hands the fiercely talented actress another sad-sack divorcee role and expects her to work magic with it. Mercifully, Lane’s the type of performer who can, and “Dogs” is kept out of the pound by the magnetism that Lane has made look easy in her recent projects.

“Dogs” is adapted from the book by Claire Cook and brought to the screen by Gary David Goldberg, the television mastermind behind “Brooklyn Bridge” and “Family Ties.” Goldberg hasn’t made a feature film since 1989’s “Dad,” yet “Dogs” shows no signs of rust. In fact, Goldberg attacks the romantic comedy clichés that hound “Dogs” repeatedly by digging in deeper than usual with the characters. Sure, Goldberg occasionally loses his marbles and includes ugly, sitcom sequences, such as one where Sarah and her family sing and dance to the “Partridge Family” theme song. Yet, surrounding these migraine-inducing scenes are rich performances and thoughtful characterizations shaped smoothly by Goldberg. “Dogs” doesn’t quite drill down to the heart’s core, but you’d be amazed just how well Goldberg gets his ideas and performances across without the material ever getting too labored or cutesy.

Goldberg even manages the impossible and gets Cook’s multi-character novel into reasonable fighting shape. There’s a multitude of roles in “Dogs” that clearly had more time to roam on the written page, yet Goldberg doesn’t mourn their absence. Though he indulges Christopher Plummer and his patriarch character, the rest of the film keeps its eyes on Sarah and her dilemma. The peripheral characters just add spice, and their presence is never felt as a gap in the storytelling. I wish more filmmakers had this skill.

The ace up Goldberg’s sleeve is Diane Lane, and in “Dogs,” the actress delivers another sincere, rich performance in a role she knows how to knock around well. Again bravely playing up her age, Lane refuses to pity Sarah, and just plays her as the hurt, bemused person she is. Lane is the cream of this confection, and there’s no one working today who could play this role as well as she can. Thankfully, she also shares great chemistry with a delightfully doughy John Cusack, and their snappy back-and-forth makes for some of the picture’s best moments.

“Must Love Dogs” succumbs to the worst romantic comedy trappings for the finale, but by this time Goldberg has done such an outstanding job keeping his audience invested, that flights of formula don’t hurt the soul a bit. “Must Love Dogs” is dependable filmmaking in an uneven genre, and it’s a treat to see it sail evenly.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=12657&reviewer=404
originally posted: 07/29/05 13:42:17
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

12/01/06 SabresFanatic Disappointed. Needed more of Cusack and Plummer 3 stars
7/10/06 Marty i liked it and i don't know why. diane lane's hot maybe? 4 stars
5/08/06 Diane Perkins boring, love diane and john but neither very good in this movie 2 stars
5/03/06 Ashley Hinz I won't watch this again. What a waste of Plummer and Cusack. 2 stars
1/29/06 Lily It's just one big "perfectmatch.com" commercial. 2 stars
12/26/05 zhivago john cusack is incapable of making a bad movie 5 stars
11/11/05 Jinx This movie stinks. Too much sex and innuendo. 1 stars
10/29/05 Rover Must hate contemporary "romantic" "comedies"! 1 stars
10/29/05 Mrs. Casey Donovan Diane Lane is an obnoxious skank. I'd like to stuff scorpions up her rectum. 1 stars
10/29/05 Allison Lafferty Anyone else notice "heroine" is an unlikeble self-centered brat? 1 stars
10/29/05 Jenny Tullwartz If it's really yourself you're mad at, break your own damn glasses, for pete's sake! 1 stars
10/15/05 Aaron Terrible. 1 stars
10/12/05 eddiejohns You must really love dogs to love this movie. It bites! 2 stars
10/12/05 Josh Swanson Total garbage. Not worth my time or money...got in for a free screening...no wasted money! 1 stars
10/07/05 Don Your review is so spot on its funny, but I still loved the movie; Im in love with DL 4 stars
10/06/05 Susan I knew it! yucky! 1 stars
9/29/05 Sarah was ere my name is sarah darymple i loooveee emaweise 1 stars
9/21/05 karen romantic 4 stars
8/09/05 jada i'm just embarrassed for John Cusack, cheesy & hit every awful cliche, hated it 1 stars
8/05/05 ron abrams yawn. what a waste. 2 stars
7/31/05 Bonnie Roberts I wouldn't see it twice 2 stars
7/30/05 Naka Ungh. No. 2 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  29-Jul-2005 (PG-13)
  DVD: 20-Dec-2005

UK
  N/A

Australia
  06-Oct-2005




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast