More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 31.25%
Worth A Look50%
Average: 4.17%
Pretty Bad: 14.58%
Total Crap: 0%

5 reviews, 18 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Predator, The by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Rob Gonsalves

Madeline's Madeline by Jay Seaver

Won't You Be My Neighbor? by Rob Gonsalves

Brothers' Nest by Jay Seaver

Mandy by Peter Sobczynski

Gonjiam: Haunted Asylum by Jay Seaver

Maquia: When the Promised Flower Blooms by Jay Seaver

Field Guide to Evil by Jay Seaver

Piercing by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Proof (2005)
[] Buy posters from this movie
by Jay Seaver

"But, then, it's all subjective"
5 stars

I always get a little excited when a movie about mathematicians or scientists comes out and actually seems to display some interest in or affinity for math and science. "Proof" isn't about the actual nuts and bolts of mathematics, but it gets the terminology and mindset mostly right, and never goes the route of suggesting that knowledge is dangerous or something humanity can't be trusted with. Indeed, it shows characters excited and even giddy at the prospect of learning and discovery, even if their personal stories aren't always so happy.

Take Catherine (Gwyneth Paltrow). A potentially brilliant mathematical mind in her own right, she has spent the past few years caring for her father (Anthony Hopkins), who was brilliant in his younger days but who has paid the karmic price that drama demands of genius, and has spent the past twenty years at the mercy of compulsion and dementia. After his death, his former grad student Hal (Jake Gyllenhaal) comes to their house to see if he left anything interesting behind, while older daughter Claire (Hope Davis) arrives to take care of funeral arrangements and look after Catherine, whose fragility suggests that she might have inherited their father's instability along with his genius. Catherine points Hal to a notebook containing an extraordinary proof, but also claims that she, rather than her father, had worked it out.

Though set against the world of mathematical academia, math itself has very little to do with the story. In theory, the disputed proof could have been a poem or novel, but it works much better with numbers; they're objective, and the personality of the author shows through far less clearly. Besides, it makes for a nice later contrast, as "proof" becomes a play on words: A theorem can be shown to be objectively true, but eventually Hal must make a leap of faith as to its authorship. And that involves not just examining the work, but examining Catherine.

Gwyneth Paltrow makes us wonder about Catherine - is she just collapsing under the strain of having had to tend to her mentally ill father for years without a break (and then the added strain of losing him and having to deal with her sister), or is her head just wired differently, so that she misremembers things (we've already seen her talking to her dead father)? What's better is that there's personality on top of that; she's not just a collection of weaknesses. Hal falls for her not just because she looks like Gwyneth Paltrow and knows her math; she's loyal and devoted, perhaps to a fault; her occasional sarcasm and hostility to her sister actually make her more appealing, because they reveal her as more than a beat-up rag doll.

Hope Davis probably has the film's most thankless role, but the one that's likely second only to Paltrow's in importance and difficulty. Her job, basically, is to make us kind of hate her for being normal, for being concerned about clothes and the will and not being incredibly rude. Sure, she's patronizing, but sometimes it's hard not to be when you don't know how to relate to somebody. Anthony Hopkins gives the kind of performance expected of him - intelligent with the attendant charm and distance. Gyllenhaal perfectly nails a certain type of nerd, passionate about things that seem completely abstruse to a layman but also outgoing, at least within the circle that understands his passion.

"Proof" is based on a play, but you might not be able to tell from the way it's shot; it doesn't hover around one room or location. It's a small gem of a film, worth seeing for how well it gets the audience inside these people's heads, despite theirs not being the sort of heads most people can easily understand.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 11/18/05 15:33:24
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2005 Toronto Film Festival For more in the 2005 Toronto Film Festival series, click here.

User Comments

1/21/14 mona maggio was this about the same math professor in a beautiful mind? 3 stars
5/10/11 Stephanie Love this movie. Like the sequel to A Beautiful Mind! 4 stars
1/17/09 Shaun Wallner Interesting Story! 4 stars
10/16/07 R.W. Welch Adeptly written drama about crack(ers) mathematicians. Good casting. 4 stars
7/28/07 fools♫gold Originally and strangely exciting! 4 stars
5/03/07 swamprat Loved the play, and to really appreciate the movie- see the play 4 stars
11/25/06 sokukodo Excellent acting all around. 5 stars
8/21/06 dpl Good acting, but a story that goes nowhere... gives nothing. 2 stars
7/18/06 Katie This is a awesome movie but I would like to know if they are coming with a second one 5 stars
7/14/06 Taylor Fladgate Excellent performances 4 stars
5/18/06 michael pretty fair 4 stars
5/18/06 Gavin Bamber tear-jerker 4 stars
4/22/06 Indrid Cold Shakespeare in Love notwithstanding, I didn't realize Paltrow isn't just a pretty face. 4 stars
4/14/06 Kendra Gordon Its a a short movie and has a bad ending it doesn't 4 stars
3/20/06 Phil M. Aficionado Good solid effort by all, but not a particularly gripping thing. GP is excellent; Jake too 4 stars
3/03/06 Simon Excellently performed, but really, what else is there to write home about? don't ovranalyze 3 stars
10/15/05 jcjs i liked this more than 'Beautiful Mind' or 'Goodwill Hunting' which i thiink is contrived 5 stars
10/04/05 E. Northam Expect a filmed play. Brilliantly written; perfectly cast; superbly performed. 4 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  16-Sep-2005 (PG-13)
  DVD: 14-Feb-2006

  10-Feb-2006 (12A)


Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast