More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.09

Awesome: 13.39%
Worth A Look27.56%
Average27.56%
Pretty Bad: 18.11%
Total Crap: 13.39%

12 reviews, 55 user ratings



Final Destination 3
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by MP Bartley

"Deathly Dull."
2 stars

I would firmly argue that the first 'Final Destination' is one of the best horror films of the last ten years - scary, freaky and utterly unique. The sequel was a decent follow up that may have been better off as a DTV sequel, but did the job of entertaining in a gruesome way reasonably well. The third however, shows that laziness has set in and even Death himself is struggling to find new and creative ways of dispatching annoying teenagers.

We all know the score about why Death gets pissed off in these films. He marks certain people for the afterlife in a particularly violent accident, only for someone to have a psychic vision of their fate, leading to their escape along with their friends. Death then gets vengeful and tracks them down one by one, offing them in increasingly grizzly ways. First time round, it was a plane explosion, the second time a motorway pile-up. This time, it's a rollercoaster accident and it's Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) who manages to get her friends off the ride, after having a vision of the carnage about to ensue. Death then begins its stalking, with Wendy claiming that she can tell who will be next to go by clues left on photos of her friends she was taking just before the ride started.

You can criticise 'Final Destination 3' for a lot of things, and arguably they're aspects that maybe don't matter that much for a film of this intent or genre. Yes, it's in extreme bad taste to show a picture of the Twin Towers with a shadow of a plane over it to help the claim that photos can reveal the foreshadowing of Death. And yes, it also has gaping gaps of logic - the man who ultimately causes the deaths on the ride, is one of the people that Wendy gets removed from the rollercoaster. And why do the police never take an interest in the spate of bizarre deaths considering that the same person is on the scene every time? These are forgiveable, but what isn't is that there is no ounce of creativity or a trace of surprise left in the franchise.

Whereas the first had a genuine sense of surprise, in that it constantly caught you off guard as to who would die next and when, the third has none of that. Instead, it's just a rote and tired procession of killing off the rest of the characters, with no real surprises up its sleeve at all. Every time the film returns to a character, there's no question as to whether they'll die this time or survive, they are wiped out within a few minutes of their reintroduction, and the film becomes a predictable trot to its conclusion. And while the first film had a good bunch of characters that managed to work up some sympathy, it's a faceless bunch of stereotypes here - Paris Hilton wannabes, a goth, a fitness fanatic who's needlessly aggressive to everyone.

What's worse is that the creative deaths that the first, and most of the second, so rejoiced in, are missing for a great deal of the film. The editing is such a bad hack job that it's never clear what's going on or how the death is being set up. One death involving a nail gun is particularly effective, as is one in a tanning salon, but the first death doesn't even make clear that it's a survivor from the rollercoaster, while another in a gym literally makes no sense - I have no idea what happened or how. Heck, even the rollercoaster accident is edited into haphazard confusion - and I hate rollercoasters, so the fact that it doesn't scare even me is a sign of how badly this film fails.

The first film is a creepy, ingenious minor masterpiece. The second is trashy, but watchable, fun. The third is barely watchable trash. You know you're in trouble when the most creative thought has gone into how to disguise Tony Todd for his two cameo roles.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=13933&reviewer=293
originally posted: 09/12/06 19:57:09
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

12/19/13 Monday Morning Hideous, horribly painful deaths will never go out of style! 5 stars
7/29/12 cr a guilty pleasure of the series. still a fun movie. 3 stars
11/12/10 PAUL SHORTT MORE OF THE SAME, ONLY DULLER 1 stars
3/10/10 Josie Cotton is a goddess Goofy fun 3 stars
1/11/09 Daniel Omer It has mediocre acting and gore, but the ending plain sucks. 2 stars
12/20/08 dominic thebestmovieeverandidontlie 5 stars
9/28/08 Shaun Wallner Awesome story! 5 stars
7/10/07 Total Crap Waste of my precious time. People who don't know wtf they're watching will like it. 1 stars
5/30/07 wouldntulyke2no its the best out of the 3 films but did have some plot holes 5 stars
5/12/07 Matt The best film in the t(h)rilogy. The 'choose thier fate' option on the DVD is ace. 5 stars
4/02/07 fools♫gold I guess it's good when you put it on mute. Doesn't even compare to the first two. 1/5 or 2/ 2 stars
2/11/07 AJ Muller Just a good fucking time, man. If you dug the first 2 well, here's more inventive deaths. 4 stars
2/04/07 x/x.W i l t e d.Rose.x/x The Best Final Destination. One Of My Fave Movies. Its Awesome Go See It__xx 5 stars
12/30/06 Sumixam all 3 are good, this is right up there 5 stars
12/18/06 Jeremy Movie sucked because it threw the second one out the window. 3 stars
11/02/06 Patsyc I loved the first one. The second one was good. This one was good but not quite as scary. 4 stars
10/30/06 Roger Wilks The deaths are ridiculous and sickening. The plot is senseless. SUCKS!!! 1 stars
10/25/06 Drew G Some pretty good deaths, but overall disappointing 2 stars
10/24/06 Sara It sucked because the ending was grap. 1 stars
10/06/06 Michael Coovert This plot has been played out; nothing compared to the first or second. 3 stars
10/01/06 Beau the most goriest one especially wen girls burn alive in tanning. great horror 4 stars
9/23/06 David Pollastrini good gore. 4 stars
9/19/06 Luckdeezy Pretty good...worth watching for sure 4 stars
9/14/06 Mara Frost not as good as the first 2, but still fun and original 4 stars
9/13/06 veronique ya need to like it 3 stars
9/13/06 Jorge Coronilla It wasn't that bad. 4 stars
9/13/06 Edward Connell Unforseen events make this movie interesting 5 stars
9/05/06 Indrid Cold The formula is wearing a little thin, but still more fun than most mainstream horror. 3 stars
8/25/06 Littlepurch Great gory deaths and although the middle sags, the fantastic start and end make up for it. 4 stars
8/13/06 Danny Respectable. Not as good as FD, but better than FD2. 4 stars
8/07/06 Tim The guy with the camera got off the ride the second time and he started the accident? 2 stars
8/05/06 Dan The DVD has a neat "choose their fate" option 4 stars
8/05/06 Stanley Thai Not as good as the first two. It's a decent movie wih decent kills and decent acting. 3 stars
8/02/06 Mark Louis Baumgart Decent and fun sequel. Unfortunately the ending violates the first rule of the series. 3 stars
7/29/06 action movie fan rehash of the first two--decent stpyr--overly gory though 4 stars
7/28/06 Alberto AGUIRRE My favorite film espesially the roller coaster scene. 5 stars
7/27/06 Lisa Death scenes worth a look and thena rewind!!! 3 stars
6/05/06 mary really scary 5 stars
4/28/06 BAH BAH 1 stars
4/10/06 alice Very amusing ! 4 stars
3/29/06 mick fantastic film would recommend 5 stars
3/17/06 Mason Token negro gets head crushed, what's not to like? 3 stars
3/14/06 James Bond Terrific 5 stars
3/09/06 Valerie It was alright, BUT i still think that the 1st and the 2nd ones were better 4 stars
3/01/06 Littlepurch Morgan & Wong clearly didn't want to be outdone by FD2, and make an hilarious comback here! 5 stars
2/27/06 Steven Lewis Go see it for the deaths! 4 stars
2/22/06 li' buddy really graphic good movie but same stuff as before i want mething new 4 stars
2/22/06 Jaime Moore A Great Flick much bearly better than the first two put togeather. 5 stars
2/19/06 Nic As good if not better than first 2 films... 4 stars
2/19/06 chris f totally awesome movie i loved it from start to finish 5 stars
2/14/06 Ole Man Bourbon The lead actress sucks something horrid. Typical movie for the franchise. 3 stars
2/14/06 jeff liked the scond one better but still good. 5 stars
2/12/06 Perry Mason I hate creative killing movies. This was just boring as hell. 2 stars
2/11/06 JC that movie was TOO Trill!..NEVER go Tanning again! 5 stars
2/11/06 rich Not bad for a new horror movie 4 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  10-Feb-2006 (R)
  DVD: 25-Jul-2006

UK
  10-Feb-2006

Australia
  27-Apr-2006




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast