More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.51

Awesome: 24.51%
Worth A Look: 25.49%
Average30.39%
Pretty Bad: 15.69%
Total Crap: 3.92%

8 reviews, 54 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Loving Vincent by Jay Seaver

Fortress, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Hills Have Eyes, The (2006)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Peter Sobczynski

"Another week, another pointless and unnecessary remake"
2 stars

Although remakes of perfectly decent movies have become increasingly common these days, they seem to be even more prevalent within the horror genre. After the surprise success of the contemporary retreads of such titles as “The Texas Chain Saw Massacre,” “The Ring” and “Dawn of the Dead,” the last year or so alone has given us new (and largely inferior) revisions of “Assault on Precinct 13,” “The Ring 2,” “The Amityville Horror,” “House of Wax,” “Dark Water,” “Chaos” (a spin on “Last House on the Left” in all but name only), “The Fog” and “When a Stranger Calls.” Since most of these titles have made some money, mostly amongst teenagers too young to have experienced the original and who have been lured by familiar TV actors and the ever-important PG-13 rating, the cycle doesn’t appearing to be ending anytime soon–the next few months will also see new versions of “Pulse,” “The Omen” and, perhaps inevitably, “Friday the 13th.” If I haven’t already retired from reviewing films by the time that Michael Bay III announces a low-budget ($200 million) remake of “Hostel,” I promise to do so at that time.

The latest such remake is “The Hills Have Eyes,” a new version of the notoriously brutal 1977 shockfest that Wes Craven directed as a follow-up to his scandalous debut “Last House on the Left.” To be fair, it is slightly better than most of the recent string of retreads–it has been made with a certain style and gorehounds who have grown increasingly upset over the rash of bland PG-13 horror films will be happy to know that this particular example doesn’t not skimp on the blood or the brutality. And yet, unlike the few great horror remakes to make it through the pipeline (a list that includes John Carpenter’s “The Thing,” David Cronenberg’s “The Fly” and Paul Schrader’s “Cat People”), it never quite breaks away from its ancestor to become its own film. In the end, it winds up being nothing more than a retread–a skillfully made one, I suppose, but one that never quite lives up to the original.

Aside from a few tweaks, the basic storyline is virtually the same. An extended family–including a hard-headed patriarch (Ted Levine), his religious wife (Kathleen Quinlan), an annoying son (Dan Byrd),a newly married older daughter (Vinessa Shaw) with her spineless liberal husband (Aaron Stanford) and newborn child, a slutty younger daughter (Emilie de Ravin) and a pair of giant dogs–are driving cross-country to California when they are waylaid in the middle of the New Mexico desert after breaking an axle. Of course, what they don’t realize is that they have fallen into a trap laid by a family of hideously deformed mutants who have been living out there ever since the US government used the area for nuclear testing in the 1940's. Settling in for the night, the family is brutally attacked without warning and when the carnage subsides, the survivors discover to their horror that the baby has been taken from them. In order to save both the child and themselves, the civilized people are forced to reduce themselves to a primitive state in order to fight back with just as much brutality and savagery as they have received. Put it this way, this is the kind of movie where a scene of cannibalism winds up coming off as a mere afterthought.

To be honest, the original “The Hills Have Eyes” wasn’t much of a movie either; the basic idea of decent people being reduced to savagery was one that Craven had previously explored to far better effect in “Last House on the Left.” What the original did have was a certain grim determination to unnerve viewers with disturbing and unspeakable imagery and to create the idea that any one of the good guys (even the baby) could be mercilessly slaughtered at any point. (Even one of the dogs met its maker in a singularly unpleasant manner.) In addition, it also contained, in the presence of Michael Berryman’s malevolent Pluto, one of the unmistakable icons of 1970's horror–one look at his bald head, hulking frame and creepy demeanor and even the most jaded genre buffs felt a chill go down their spines. These things may not sound like much, especially when compared to the genuinely frightening and transgressive likes of the original “Texas Chain Saw Massacre,” but they had an impact on viewers at the time and they still hold up to a degree today.

The problem with this new version is that most of the shock sequences are staged virtually beat-for-beat in the same manner as the original. For those who never caught it then, such an approach might be okay but those who are familiar with the original will find the proceedings here to be less than startling or surprising. I kept waiting for director/co-writer Alexandre Aja to throw some new quirk or kink into the proceedings to mess things up a bit in a good way but all he contributes to that end is a parade of heavily made-up mutants that look more like a group of extras wearing rejects from a costume factory instead of a tightly-knit and dangerously inbred clan of savages. (He seems to have put more thought into staging one shot to simultaneously echo key images from both “2001" and “A Clockwork Orange” than in giving his villains any sort of individual personality.) Even the descent into violence that our heroes descend to in order to survive lacks any real impact–after a few seconds of fumbling around, they are soon picking off bad guys without even a hint of regret or remorse at what they have been reduced to and the provocative suggestion at the end of the original–that the two seemingly different families could actually grow together once the violent and hard-headed patriarchs were disposed of–is also ignored for another climax in which seemingly dead people jump up for once last shot before being dispatched in a suitably crowd-pleasing manner.

“The Hills Have Eyes” has some virtues–the performances are generally low-key and realistic (not always the easiest thing to achieve in a film like this) and Aja, whose previous effort was the stylish-but-idiotic “Haute Tension,” once again demonstrates that he has the chops to one day direct a good horror film even though he still hasn’t done so as of yet–but they wind up being overwhelmed by the sheer superfluousness of the entire enterprise. For those who never got to see the original, they may well get a couple of genuine jolts for their $10, certainly more than they received from most of the recent genre exercises. However, that same ten-spot could just as easily be used to purchase the DVD of the original–it may not be as slick or hip as this version but it still packs enough of a genuine jolt to more than make up for that.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=14095&reviewer=389
originally posted: 03/10/06 16:02:42
[printer] printer-friendly format  
Horror Remakes: For more in the Horror Remakes series, click here.

User Comments

2/13/17 morris campbell harsh but alot better than the original 4 stars
4/01/16 Aj wales This is better than the original. 4 stars
1/04/14 Marty Pretty solid horror movie with some gross-out moments and good acting/action. 4 stars
8/12/11 jiropan best remake......so brutal and intense movie 5 stars
5/15/11 stephen nettles EXCELLENT 5 stars
9/07/10 art never saw the original!,so this verison is GET"s a "THUMb's up'' from your's truly! 4 stars
3/07/10 randy todger awesome 5 stars
12/31/09 art AN EXCELLENT HORROR FILM!,and this was a remake?,you could knock me with a feather! 1 4 stars
10/20/08 Shaun Wallner Scary Film! 5 stars
7/20/08 Shaun Wallner Bloody Awesome!!! 5 stars
7/12/08 John Millheim Creepy, good horror, the dudes are gross looking in the hills 5 stars
6/28/08 Danny See the original instead. Trust me on this one. 1 stars
12/09/07 Vincent sick horror movie 5 stars
7/21/07 al smith fucking amazing nuff said 5 stars
4/27/07 Total Crap Very disturbing, but it's no "Last House on the Left" 3 stars
3/01/07 Beau So disgusting !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i wouldnt see it again but not too bad horror 3 stars
2/16/07 Axel Leos boring and why make remakes, they only ruin the original movie 2 stars
12/30/06 Pavid Smorpal33ni bad film. 1 stars
11/03/06 David Pollastrini good gore. 4 stars
10/23/06 WTF Ugh, Man! What the Fuck?! This is Ultra-Disturbing. And the gore. I could not eat a chip. 4 stars
10/09/06 Booksworm Aww, I was hoping you'd like it.That way I could say it was crap. 1 stars
10/01/06 Soraya ROBERT JOY was incredible as LIZARD! What a great movie and well acted too... 5 stars
8/29/06 Nick A lot of gore! And good emotions! Nice Job Wes! 4 stars
8/12/06 Indrid Cold Does a great job bringing the pain and otherwise defying expectations. 4 stars
8/09/06 Dragon The Artist Not enough cannibalism,the head psycho resembledRubberJohnny&that dog kept being the hero 1 stars
8/02/06 dan alot like the original but worth watching 4 stars
7/24/06 Samuel I'm not sure it's a sgood as the origional, but it's right up there...damn good remake!! 4 stars
7/11/06 Kyle Technically better than orig., but the main characters are a bit more wooden. 3 stars
6/27/06 Dillon This movie has balls. Props to Aja and his crew. 4 stars
6/25/06 MP Bartley Goes on a bit. Satisfying for the gorehounds but little else. 3 stars
6/24/06 Mike How is this different than Wrong Turn? Wrong turn into desert and attacked by cannibals 3 stars
6/13/06 Tasia I loved this movie...even if it was a little different from the original..it was worth it! 5 stars
6/05/06 misty great 5 stars
5/12/06 Marcia Zarwetten-Grassi Like 3 kids & a baby could survive in desert after blowin up their food & water. Yeah! 3 stars
4/30/06 Alex de Fig I'm glad thats over. Entertaining but very unsettling. 3 stars
4/23/06 Dan I liked this... Alexandre Aja is a top director 5 stars
4/18/06 Dave Pretty good, but not a classic horror film at all 4 stars
4/13/06 San Lamar A MUST SEE!!!! AMAZING!!!! 5 stars
4/06/06 Troy M. Grzych Predictable and Reminisent of "Texas Chainsaw" but provides some scares. 3 stars
4/04/06 haney awesome!!!!!!!!!!! 5 stars
4/04/06 y2mckay first half drags, last half is gruesome fun (I counted at least four axe-to-head scenes) 3 stars
4/03/06 JRE it's really scary, but disgusting at the same time. if you're squimish, stay away 4 stars
3/30/06 M. Dido Ted Levine is a demigod! Everyone else pales by comparison! 3 stars
3/24/06 jesika umm.. if uve seen texas chain saw/wrong turn- my friend - uve seen this one - ugh! 2 stars
3/24/06 Ole Man Bourbon Pretty shittty really 2 stars
3/23/06 ROY L. CAIN JR. What a horror movie should be. Pass the kayro syrup ! 5 stars
3/22/06 Bryan Locks This film is alot more disturbing than scary.Unless your'e a sick freak, don't waste your $ 2 stars
3/20/06 Dk Not scary enough just ultra bloody 3 stars
3/16/06 bob furgerson Best horror movie I have seen in a long time 5 stars
3/15/06 great surprised at all the bad reviews, i thought it was really good, really disturbing scenes 5 stars
3/14/06 Lester M. Davis What more can you ask of a horror flick. 3 stars
3/14/06 Tyler L Awesome movie, Aja is someone to keep an eye on. 5 stars
3/13/06 Juicy J I puked from this movie....in glory!! 5 stars
3/12/06 lee Although intense and brutal, the film runs out of steam. 3 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  10-Mar-2006 (R)
  DVD: 20-Jun-2006

UK
  10-Mar-2006

Australia
  20-Apr-2006



[trailer] Trailer




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast