More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.35

Awesome: 16.67%
Worth A Look46.43%
Average: 7.14%
Pretty Bad: 14.29%
Total Crap: 15.48%

7 reviews, 42 user ratings


Latest Reviews

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

Death Note: Light Up the New World by Jay Seaver

Brawl in Cell Block 99 by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed


City of Angels
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Rob Gonsalves

"Needless Hollywood dumbing-down of Wim Wenders."
2 stars

Why do so many people seem to want so badly to believe in guardian angels?

To me, there's something vaguely creepy and stalker-ish about the whole concept: invisible beings floating around, watching you and maybe giving you a kindly nudge every so often. Ick. Guardian angels sound like a plot devised by an Orwellian government so that we'll gradually get used to, and even embrace, the idea of being spied on. (Now that might be an interesting movie premise. Call Oliver Stone.)

The one angel movie that gets around my defenses is, of course, Wings of Desire -- Wim Wenders' acclaimed 1988 fantasy in which Bruno Ganz gives up his halo, becomes human, and wins the heart of beautiful acrobat Solveig Dommartin. A decade later, Wenders' vision comes to us Hollywoodized -- not to mention bastardized -- in the new remake City of Angels, in which Nicolas Cage gives up his wings to be with surgeon Meg Ryan. There could hardly be a better illustration of Hollywood's uncanny ability to suck all the brains out of a good idea.

City of Angels begins as Wings of Desire does, with passing glances at random citizens (in Los Angeles instead of Berlin) whose thoughts we overhear. Wenders used the device to make us feel like isolated angels, doomed to eavesdrop on people but never communicate. The filmmakers here, director Brad Silberling (Casper) and scripter Dana Stevens, don't sustain the angel's-eye device. Whereas Wenders established black-and-white photography as the way angels see the world, this film is in lush color. In the remake, when an angel becomes human and marvels at the sight of his own blood -- "Red! Red! Color!" -- it makes no sense, since we've spent the movie seeing through his eyes and admiring John Seale's lovely color photography.

Wenders' film was also about duality and splits of all kinds; its forbidding Berlin Wall (still standing when the film was shot) and characters with double lives (including Peter Falk playing himself playing a role in a movie) gave us a brooding sense of fractured existence. People go through life looking for wholeness, taking their flawed, painful humanity for granted. There's also, of course, the eternal divide between the spirit and the flesh. City of Angels pays some feeble lip service to this last idea. Nicolas Cage, the angel protagonist, can't feel or taste or smell anything. He yearns to be human so he can be with Dr. Meg, who is specifically looking for a guy who can feel, taste, and smell things, apparently.

Somehow Meg is able to see Nicolas in her operating room, staring at her over the soon-to-be-dead body of a guy whose heart she's fondling (this must be what Hollywood calls a "meet cute"). Soon she's telling him how a pear tastes and he's getting advice from a red-faced Dennis Franz as a former angel turned human. The spiritual pieties come fast and hard, and we get a bare-assed Dennis Franz running into the surf and a scene where Meg stabs Nicolas with a knife to see if he bleeds. If a woman stabbed me to see if I bleed, I'd want to be anywhere that she's not. But no, Nic trades in his wings for his blade-happy sweetie.

As always, Nicolas Cage keeps his end of the bargain; he commits heart-and-soul to a role no matter how stupid the movie is, and he makes you feel the emotional highs and lows of his newly human hero. In his early scenes, when he's following Meg everywhere, he reminds you less of a creepy stalker than of a lost puppy looking for a warm lap to snuggle in. But after he turns human, City of Angels loses whatever humanity it had, regressing into pointless tragedy and manipulative tearjerking. I mean, even Wim Wenders didn't feel compelled to whack Solveig Dommartin with a lumber truck, for Christ's sake.

We've reached a weird point in cinema history, where "uplifting" Hollywood romances are more depressing than solemn German art films.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=141&reviewer=416
originally posted: 01/27/07 08:30:00
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

8/18/07 R.W. Welch Flat revamp of Wings of Desire holds little fascination. 3 stars
8/15/06 Luisa Very touching film 4 stars
11/04/05 tatum Sweet romance; had trouble with the theology, though 4 stars
8/18/05 ES I kept waiting for some demons to show up and make this a good movie 2 stars
1/03/05 UMER meg ryan rules 5 stars
2/02/04 I Would Crap remake of Wim Wenders' masterpiece. 2 stars
9/23/03 Alan Saved from being crap by five minutes of Lake Tahoe scenery. Aw, hell; it is total crap. 1 stars
3/04/03 Jack Sommersby Good technical work at service of ho-hum, tear-jerker screenplay. 2 stars
7/20/02 ??? a great love story 5 stars
7/12/02 KMG QUESTION: Why does Hollywood keep casting Meg opposite hotties? She sux 3 stars
2/11/02 John Michael Hughes After seeing this, I want a divorce from Meg Ryan. 1 stars
2/01/02 Tshepang Alfred Dahnk The Most beautiful film ever. 5 stars
12/11/01 Monster W. Kung Vastly inferior to Wender's Wings of Desire. Watch that one, not crappy remakes. 2 stars
10/15/01 Andrew Carden I Cannot Handle These Tearjerkers!!! I'll Never Watch This Crap Again!!! 1 stars
9/04/01 Butterbean Nice start with a let down ending 3 stars
5/16/01 The Jedi Droid The thing I liked about this movie is that the ending is not predictable. good flick 4 stars
11/13/00 The EVIL Penguin good, but gets a little boring at times 3 stars
2/16/00 Kyle Broflovski *sniffle, blowing nose* Totally poetic...one of the better chick-flicks...*bawling* 5 stars
12/15/99 Bridget total taerjerker..excellent movie!! 5 stars
12/06/99 PurityJustBegs The result of odious defacations could not be more horredous than this steaming pile....... 1 stars
11/10/99 stef i love this movie 5 stars
10/10/99 SJKelley The last hour of this movie gets worse and worse -- who could like this? 1 stars
4/11/99 Tristynn Meg and Nick.. what WERE you two thinking?? one of the worst I have ever seen.. 1 stars
2/24/99 mochacchino I LOVE THIS MOVIE the sound track is banging and I recomend this to everybody 5 stars
2/19/99 nun uf yur businness such a tear jurker and Meg Ryan is such a good actress!!!! 5 stars
1/15/99 DRMJSP AWESOME!! I cried! And I am a guy!! 5 stars
1/15/99 Dasha I'm a sucker for a good weepie... And this one was good. 5 stars
12/15/98 MR HOLLYWOOD!! Meg in her best role yet,Nicolas looks & acts incredibly well,slow pace but emotional. 4 stars
11/27/98 gicurok I loved this movie. Savor every moment for you may not get another. 5 stars
11/23/98 Daniel All I ended up with was the poor bastard at the end without his love..but love is worth it! 4 stars
11/19/98 Fire-n-Ice The best movie of all year,but the ending was to sad. 5 stars
11/05/98 tom could this film take any longer to get to a shitty end 2 stars
10/25/98 Lord Of The Dunce You hafta love Meg, no matter what she's in. Even French Kiss. 4 stars
9/28/98 Heather Great date movie. I wanna be Meg Ryan when I grow up. :) 4 stars
9/20/98 Ky I thought it was a beautiful film.....highly emotional and gives angels a new perspective 5 stars
9/20/98 ARMA-FUCKN-GEDDON Wow.. What else can I say.. Makes you believe, has heart. 5 stars
9/14/98 Chip Taylor NIC IS THE BOMB BABY 4 stars
9/12/98 kanatcha none 4 stars
9/11/98 canada dry has got to be the worst ending of any movie i've ever seen 1 stars
8/31/98 Mister Whoopee Angels watch you when you pee. 3 stars
8/29/98 Matt It killed 3 hours on a plane.. and my appetite as well 2 stars
8/15/98 {{{OZ}}} It's been done before, though they do it well here. 3 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  10-Apr-1998 (PG-13)
  DVD: 14-Sep-2004

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast