More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.53

Awesome28.4%
Worth A Look28.4%
Average: 14.81%
Pretty Bad: 24.69%
Total Crap: 3.7%

7 reviews, 39 user ratings



Stranger Than Fiction (2006)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Peter Sobczynski

"Five Characters In Search Of A Point."
2 stars

“Stranger Than Fiction” is a film with an initial premise that is so intriguing and seemingly sure-fire that you may find yourself wondering why no one else ever came up with it before. After about a half-hour or so, however, you’ll realize why–it is a premise that sounds great when you first hear it but which immediately falls to pieces the moment you begin to apply even the slightest bit of thought to it. As a result, a film which sounds like an appealingly trippy mind-bender of a film quickly devolves into a confused and unfocused mess that feels like a remake of “Adaptation” made be and for people who didn’t quite get “Adaptation” but wish that they did.

Will Ferrell stars as Harold Crick, a numbers-obsessed IRS agent whose life is as drab and uninvolving as his name. One day, Harold wakes up and begins to hear a voice of a British woman narrating and commenting on his daily activities. Of course, no one else can hear the voice and Harold finds himself being driven to distraction as his every move and thought is pontificated on in detail. Eventually, he becomes convinced that he is the character in a book and that the voice he is hearing belongs to the unknown author. With the help of literature professor Julius Hilbert (Dustin Hoffman), Harold tries to figure out who the author is–a quest that becomes increasingly important when the voice reveals that he is going to be killed off at the end of the story.

Even though Harold hasn’t exactly led a full and rich life, he certainly doesn’t want to die, especially after beginning a tentative romance with spunky anarchist baker Ana (Maggie Gyllenhaal), and when he discovers that the voice belongs to reclusive writer Kay Eiffel (Emma Thompson), he pays her a visit begging her not to kill him off. Problem #1–Kay is in the middle of a massive case of writer’s block and can’t figure out how to kill him off. Problem #2–Hilbert, who just happens to be an Eiffel scholar, reads her new manuscript and decrees that a.) it is indeed a masterpiece and b.) the only way that the story truly lives is if Harold doesn’t.

For months, the screenplay for “Stranger Than Fiction,” penned by first-timer Zach Helm, has been receiving glowing praise and publicity but unless the final film has mutated strongly from what was put down on paper–and I am presuming that it hasn’t–I cannot understand why so many people would be heaping accolades on a script that fails so completely on the most basic narrative level. Essentially, if the premise is to work, it means that either Harold is indeed a fictional character and that everything around him is part of her imagination or that he is a real person who has suddenly convinced himself that Kay indeed controls every aspect of his life. If the former is true, then there needs to be some explanation as to how he became self-aware and made the leap from print to reality and if the latter is true, there needs to be some explanation as to why he thinks that his life is in the hands of someone that he has presumably never met. In either event, someone also needs to explain how anyone could possibly believe that a book about a boring IRS agent named Harold Crick could possibly wind up becoming the Great American Novel in the first place.

The trouble is that neither Helm nor director Marc Forster seem to have actually sat down to figure out which it is and settle for an approach that switches off between the two seemingly at random without ever settling on a conclusive answer. I know, I know–“Stranger Than Fiction” is clearly a fantasy and it doesn’t need to be concerned with reality. Yes, but even the wildest and most head-scratching fantasies–at least the good ones–have some kind of basic internal logic that they introduce at the beginning and stick with throughout. For example, think back to Woody Allen’s 1985 masterpiece “The Purple Rose of Cairo.” Like “Stranger Than Fiction,” it was a film in which fiction and reality collided in unexpected ways (a character from a 1930's movie literally walks off the screen and into the life of a movie-mad Depression-era waitress) but Allen took the time to establish his premise and then maintained the internal logic of that premise throughout. By comparison, “Stranger Than Fiction” just seems as if it is making things up as it goes along and the effort of trying to make sense of it all becomes so great after a while that most viewers will throw up their hands in defeat without caring a whit about what happens to Harold one way or another.

Although Hoffman, Thompson and Gyllenhaal are charming and entertaining enough in their supporting roles (although Gyllenhaal is saddled with one monologue–something about baking for her former classmates at Harvard Law School–that is so awful and goes on for so long that the entire film dies for a few minutes as it plays out), much of the film rests on the shoulders of Will Ferrell and he is unfortunately just not up to the task. Like too many comedians before him who have attempted to make the transformation to Serious Actor, he seems to have confused “serious” with “somnambulistic” and turns in a performance that makes him seem like a refugee from a George Romero epic. I’m not saying that he needed to do his Ron Burgundy schtick and I give him credit for at least trying to do something new but his work is so lackluster and devoid of life (aside from the bits in which he screams at the voice in his head in a way that allows the studio to cut a trailer that makes the film look wackier than it is) that it drags everything around him down with it.

“Stranger Than Fiction” is a mess from start to finish–don’t even get me started on the inexplicable presence of Queen Latifah as a woman who has been hired by Thompson’s publishers to help her overcome her block (as someone who has occasionally been at a loss for words, I can guarantee that while there may be many ways of getting the creative juices flowing, sending Queen Latifah to dog you around the clock is most certainly not one of them)–but the worst thing about it is that it plays like an attempt to ape the works of Charlie Kaufman by someone who knows the words (or an approximation of such) but not the music. Yes, Kaufman’s screenplays (including “Being John Malkovich,” “Adaptation” and “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind”) have featured head-spinning central conceits but his real genius lies not in coming up with those way-out ideas but in the ways that he uses those way-out ideas in order to comment on such universal concerns as love, loss and personal identity. “Stranger Than Fiction” lacks that emotional resonance and winds up becoming a self-satisfied bore that is nowhere near as smart, thoughtful or funny as it so clearly thinks that it is.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=15006&reviewer=389
originally posted: 11/10/06 16:15:09
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2006 Toronto Film Festival For more in the 2006 Toronto Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2006 Chicago Film Festival For more in the 2006 Chicago Film Festival series, click here.

User Comments

1/17/09 Aesop Every member of the cast was fantastic, and this movie rocked. 5 stars
1/10/09 Anonymous. will ferrell's best film! :] 4 stars
9/13/08 David 5 stars for this movie! 5 stars
8/24/08 AnnieG Less original than I'd been led to believe, but still enjoyable to watch. 4 stars
7/08/08 mitch sims you spelled 'golem' wrong. 5 stars
11/19/07 The Russian Lunch Lady I can't believe nobody thought of a film like this before. Awesome movie. 5 stars
10/21/07 Bopo Outstanding. Very different and wonderfully executed. 5 stars
9/09/07 ES Fantastic movie 5 stars
8/15/07 Ashley I liked it!! It was nice to see this side of Farrell. I like him this way!! 4 stars
5/31/07 Marty acting good but ferrel soso, ungrounded at beginning, ending overhyped in the movie itself 3 stars
5/27/07 TreeTiger About as entertaining as watching a tax audit... 1 stars
5/24/07 Tracey Chambers I liked it. It was different, and very entertaining. 4 stars
5/01/07 Indrid Cold A mostly unsuccessful attempt to make a Charlie Kaufman movie without Charlie Kaufman. 3 stars
4/29/07 izzy jesus if the devise is that crick is a real person, then how is considering killing him not evil. 1 stars
4/26/07 The Grinch What a piece of crap. It's no 'Being There', and Will Ferrell is no Peter Sellers. 2 stars
4/24/07 David Pollastrini very funny 4 stars
4/14/07 The Talking Elbow Best movie I've seen in a long time. Highly reccomended. 5 stars
3/20/07 M Craven It has Queen Latifah in it. What the fuck, man? 3 stars
3/18/07 AliCat Third Person Omniscient 5 stars
3/10/07 Phil M. Aficionado Script, cast, and acting skill rank well above the level of the storyline 3 stars
3/06/07 David Pollastrini good concept 3 stars
1/02/07 Dave Superb! Do we live our dreams or do they live us? 5 stars
12/27/06 Agent Sands One of the most intelligent and most well-made Hollywood films this year. 5 stars
12/22/06 marooshka I thought it was the best of the year...haters are just haters 5 stars
12/18/06 Ole Man Bourbon Cute. 4 stars
12/15/06 orpy I really liked it! Different and refreshing! 4 stars
11/21/06 Spartacusyentl Better than most movies today. This one involves too much thought for the average audience. 4 stars
11/20/06 A writer Why do we write? Or say or do anything at all? Watch this movie - enough said. 5 stars
11/19/06 Dadcat Answers the question"Which is more important: art, or ordinary life?" in Hegelian fashion. 5 stars
11/19/06 FrayLo I enjoyed it. Took a while to really get going, though. 4 stars
11/19/06 Elizabeth Promising concept but found myself surprisingly bored. 2 stars
11/17/06 Sir Spam-a-lot decent movie all around 4 stars
11/16/06 ajay very good. 5 stars
11/13/06 Nanonano Totally wonderful. still thinking about the odd moments. Good dialog against .....silence. 5 stars
11/13/06 Tiffany Losco Will ferrel is great!! 4 stars
11/12/06 LOLOL It has WIll Ferrel in it. Enough Said. 5 stars
11/11/06 Mary Brilliant, deep and thought provoking! 5 stars
11/11/06 chris. eh, could have used a better screenplay. 3 stars
11/10/06 Centipedes It has Will Ferrell in it. Enough Said. 1 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  10-Nov-2006 (PG-13)
  DVD: 27-Feb-2007

UK
  01-Dec-2006

Australia
  01-Feb-2007


Directed by
  Marc Forster

Written by
  Zach Helm

Cast
  Emma Thompson
  Will Ferrell
  Maggie Gyllenhaal
  Queen Latifah
  Dustin Hoffman
  Tony Hale



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast