More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.18

Awesome: 0%
Worth A Look: 3.57%
Average39.29%
Pretty Bad: 28.57%
Total Crap: 28.57%

3 reviews, 10 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Shape of Water, The by Jay Seaver

I, Tonya by Rob Gonsalves

Wonder Wheel by Peter Sobczynski

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by Rob Gonsalves

Swindlers, The by Jay Seaver

Oro (Gold) by Jay Seaver

Disaster Artist, The by Peter Sobczynski

Explosion by Jay Seaver

Lucky (2017) by Rob Gonsalves

Breadwinner, The by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


School for Scoundrels
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"In which Napoleon Dynamite is too frequently seen in tighty-whiteys."
3 stars

None of "School for Scoundrels" is plausible, exactly, but if you can accept the premise of a man teaching wimpy guys to be more aggressive -- i.e., to be jerks who lie their way into women's beds -- then you can probably buy most of what happens. At least until the last 20 minutes or so, when it goes off the rails entirely and Ben Stiller is plotting revenge against the man who raped him. The movie intends this to be comical.

Forget Stiller, though; he only has a cameo. Our stars in this fratboy fracas are Jon Heder (still playing Napoleon Dynamite) and Billy Bob Thornton (still playing the guy who swears a lot and doesn't give a crap about anything). Heder plays Roger, a timid New York City parking enforcement officer who pines for Amanda (Jacinda Barrett), the pretty Australian girl who lives in his building but whom he can never work up the courage to talk to. On a tip from a friend, he signs up for a class taught by Dr. P (Thornton) in which the spineless participants are taught how to woo women: lie to them, pretend to relate to them, do things to impress them, and so on.

Roger takes to this better than you'd think -- better than he should, actually, which is a flaw in the film (written by Todd Phillips and Scot Armstrong and directed by Phillips). Dr. P gives everyone pagers and says that when they get an alert, they are to start a confrontation with someone immediately. Roger has an idiot coworker who deserves a fight, and Roger gives him one -- much too well for someone whom the film has already spent so much effort establishing is a complete wuss.

But the film has to get Roger's jerk capabilities up to speed quickly in order to move to Act 2, wherein Dr. P finds his most gifted student and sets out to undermine him. This is either to spur the student on to even greater heights of excellence by providing him with competition, or it's because Dr. P is just an a-hole. Whatever the reason, Dr. P and Roger are soon fighting for Amanda's affections in a most juvenile and petty fashion.

There are laughs scattered throughout the production, many of them reliant upon the comedy inherent in a man being hit in the crotch. Heder and Thornton are both doing the same shtick they've been doing regularly the past few years, but they do it well, though Heder's comparative lack of experience shows through in certain key scenes.

It needs to be more tightly edited, though. I'm talking five seconds here and there. I lost count of how many scenes reached logical, smart endings ... and then lingered several seconds longer while someone still in the scene wandered around and continued acting.

Curious, too, is the film's strange sense of humor. There's dialogue like this:

"You want a biscotti?"
"No, thanks."
"I don't blame you. They're addictive."

It's obviously meant to be a throwaway joke, the kind of thing you chuckle at while the scene moves forward. But it's not funny. And the film is full of that kind of thing, odd dialogue that has the shape of comedy but no actual comedic content.

Todd Phillips' work as writer and director has always been uneven (cf. "Old School" and "Starsky & Hutch"), but this is his most uneven yet. The nonsensical finale, where everyone figures out the truth about everyone else through only the tiniest clues, and in which airplane security is apparently still in its 20th-century stages, is just the capper on a fitfully amusing but overall unsatisfying film.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=15252&reviewer=247
originally posted: 09/29/06 16:01:35
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

12/06/08 Shaun Wallner Interesting Movie! 3 stars
7/25/08 Charles Tatum Not badly made, just not funny (except Silverman) 2 stars
3/27/08 Jack Sommersby About as funny as a dead cat in a freezer. (Again, Heder is simply horrendous.) 1 stars
3/11/08 Matt Disjointed. Amusing at times, but not nearly enough. Ultimately, just bland. 3 stars
8/18/07 mr.mike uneven blend of comic and serious tone hurts it 3 stars
12/08/06 Stephanie Throckmorton Just one question -- What happened to Lonnie's cats? 2 stars
11/06/06 Chris loved the ending didn't expect it 3 stars
10/16/06 William Goss Low-brow rom-com cousin of Fight Club works surprisingly well. Should've lost Stiller, tho. 3 stars
10/09/06 ajay sucks so hard I had to walk out. 1 stars
10/06/06 Circuitboyscott I love this movie. I thought Jon Heder and Billy Bob played off each other brilliantly. 4 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  29-Sep-2006 (PG-13)
  DVD: 13-Feb-2007

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast