More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 20%
Worth A Look52.5%
Average: 10%
Pretty Bad: 2.5%
Total Crap: 15%

4 reviews, 16 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Lion King, The (2019) by Peter Sobczynski

Stare by Jay Seaver

DreadOut by Jay Seaver

S He by Jay Seaver

We Are Little Zombies by Jay Seaver

Lion King, The (2019) by alejandroariera

Darlin' by Jay Seaver

Astronaut (2019) by Jay Seaver

White Storm 2: Drug Lords, The by Jay Seaver

Vivarium by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Meet the Robinsons
[] Buy posters from this movie
by brianorndorf

"I guess 'Chicken Little' wasn't a fluke"
1 stars

Seven writers, people. It took seven credited writers to bring “Meet the Robinsons” to the big screen. All that effort and the picture is still an absolute mess.

Lewis is an inquisitive orphan with a knack for invention and a heart aching for a family. Debuting a high-tech thought machine at his school’s science fair, his plans for victory are thwarted by the evil Bowler Hat Guy, who steals the machine for his own financial gain. Coming to his aid is Wilbur, a friend from the future who is trying to protect Lewis and his inventions. Taking Lewis to the future in his time machine, Wilbur shows the orphan a family full of affection, leaving Lewis stuck between the needs of the present and hope for the future.

Stephen J. Anderson’s “Meet the Robinsons’ is a spilled toy box of a motion picture; a random and utterly unconvincing hodgepodge of ideas and messages with idealistic comic intentions but a dearth of proper execution.

Author William Joyce’s 1993 book (titled “A Day with Wilbur Robinson”) was a little on the wacky side itself, but in trying to match that spunk to the CG animated realm, Anderson has become carried away with his movie.

“Robinsons” feels as though it was divided up into seven parts, each section passed off to a different writer with hopes that the Disneyfication process could weld the scripted chunks together seamlessly. Criminally, the opposite effect occurs; it’s a Frankenstein’s Monster of a feature, stitched together feebly from latte-fueled late night comedy brainstorming sessions and brazen Mouse House ego that declares anything colorful can be passed off as cohesion.

Seriously, with frogs running around pretending they’re in the Rat Pack, killer bowler hat invasions, Tom Selleck cameos, a time-travel subplot that makes “Back to the Future Part II” feel like “Dora the Explorer,” a kung-fu movie homage (with poor dubbing and mono sound), literal shovelfuls of wacky futuristic characters to digest, and slapstick humor on par with the Curly Joe DeRita era of the “Three Stooges,” “Robinsons” is nothing more than a shapeless series of non sequiturs, wheezing irreverence, and jokes begging desperately for laughs. Some theaters are offering the film in 3D to better pepper the viewing experience. They should all offer beds instead.

When it isn’t trying to snap the funny bone, “Robinsons” is too busy explaining itself. For a family film, “Robinsons” is an exposition nightmare; the final act a series of speeches that try to make sure the slip ‘n slide plot follows some logic to those not paying close attention. There’s also a strange bit of business with the script looking to marry a quote by Walt Disney to what passes for the film’s flea-sized morale (“hey kids…uh…don’t give up!”). Perhaps it isn’t any odder than the bowler hat bit, but it’s pretty darn close.

There’s no singular artistic voice present here, and no pinpoint push of personality to offer the film a fundamental dramatic trajectory. “Meet the Robinsons” is a mess, and a sadistically uninspired one at that.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 03/30/07 18:00:00
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

12/12/08 Matt C. i thought it was pretty fucking awful. ill stick to the incredibles and wall-e. 2 stars
9/21/08 Annie G Entertaining without packing a lick of actual sense. 3 stars
5/11/08 Kate good, but i wouldn't pay to see it again, the little kids loved the fun of it though! 4 stars
3/31/08 Sam Ok ..story well below other masterpieces .. 3 stars
12/24/07 JM Synth Much more inventive than most contemporary animated features. Ugly people though. 4 stars
11/25/07 g webster okay,I guess.My kids liked it..some of the time 3 stars
11/09/07 Charles Tatum Pretty entertaining, certainly better than "Shrek" 4 stars
10/14/07 Private Only the final 15-20 minutes keep this from being below average. 3 stars
10/01/07 Andrew Kercher Hilarious, creative, inventive, innovative; great Disney fare with positive message. 5 stars
7/03/07 William Goss Overstuffed story nearly spoils several inspired elements. A blast in 3D. 4 stars
5/18/07 KingNeutron Adam West and Tom Selleck cameos FTW! Good family/funny film. 4 stars
4/11/07 Ole Man Bourbon Neat to see in 3-D. Some great animation at times. Story ok. 4 stars
4/10/07 Pokejedservo Its not perfect but it was genuinely entertaining. 4 stars
4/08/07 Darrtk Disney is back! 4 stars
4/03/07 Kisuta Fun family film. Seemed a little short. 4 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  30-Mar-2007 (G)
  DVD: 23-Oct-2007

  30-Mar-2007 (U)
  DVD: 10-Sep-2007

  29-Mar-2007 (G)

Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast