More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.88

Awesome38.3%
Worth A Look: 37.23%
Average: 7.45%
Pretty Bad: 8.51%
Total Crap: 8.51%

7 reviews, 52 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Finding Fanny by Jay Seaver

Real by Jay Seaver

Hunter X Hunter: The Last Mission by Jay Seaver

Pirates, The (2014) by Jay Seaver

Naked Ambition 3D by Jay Seaver

Time Lapse by Jay Seaver

Black Butler by Jay Seaver

Drop, The by Peter Sobczynski

Hunter X Hunter: Phantom Rouge by Jay Seaver

WolfCop by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by brianorndorf

"The Harry Potter film even muggles like me could adore"
5 stars

2005’s “Goblet of Fire” jolted the “Harry Potter” series to a new level of emotional investment and dramatic concern. It was a high point for the franchise, finally finding substantial meat for us muggles (I’m no student of J.K. Rowling’s work) to chew on. “Order of the Phoenix” manages to top that potential in an immense way, compacting the longest “Potter” book into the shortest film yet (135 minutes), streamlining the urgency into a tasty pudding fan and non-fan should positively respond to.

With the death of Cedric Diggory weighing heavily on his soul, Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) enters his fifth year at Hogwarts an angry young man, struck with disbelief over how many dispute his claim that Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) has returned. After learning that Voldemort is planning a war on wizards, from Sirius Black (Gary Oldman) and the secret Order of the Phoenix, Harry, Ron (Rupert Grint), and Hermione (Emma Watson) choose to teach a group of Hogwarts students the finer points of spell casting to create their own army. All this upsets new Defence Against the Dark Arts professor Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton), who looks to ban all practical usage of magic and assume control of the school.

How “Phoenix” turned out so magnificently is a bit of a mystery. Here we have screenwriter Michael Goldenberg replacing Steve Kloves, who guided the first four movies of this series to adaptation contentment, meticulously and creatively shuffling pieces of Rowling’s imagination to best fit the rigid confines of a feature film. Surprisingly, Goldenberg acquits himself beautifully to the demanding job, cleaving away massive sections of narrative to boil the film down to the basics. The new picture is dense with exposition, trying to summon a lightening storm of tension between the arrival of evil and the organization of good. The script hugs those thick guide rails tightly, focusing on Harry’s newfound leadership role and the persistence of Voldemort to split the boy’s mind in two.

Obviously, Goldenberg can’t always smuggle plot points in organically; a prime example is found in the appearance of Hagrid’s giant brother, Grawp, who factors into the payoff of the picture, but never transforms into a needed part of the momentum; an addition meant more for fans than narrative importance. The fringe of Umbridge’s sinister wrath is also an element that’s lost to the cruel world of judicious book-to-film adaptations. She’s established with icy, passive-aggressive menace, but the reach of her venom is left a little blurry.

Behind the camera is David Yates, the first filmmaker of the series without any serious big screen credits to his name. Yates is primarily a television helmer, brought into the “Potter” fold due to his ease with actors. The effect is obvious from the get go; Yates pulls a much more profound performance out of Radcliffe in a feature that rests entirely on the young actor’s shoulders. It helps that he’s working with the absolute best English talent (Michael Gambon, Jason Issacs, and Fiennes are all outstanding), but Yates is digging a little deeper than his predecessors ever could. He’s working with a plot that doesn’t cause a dramatic earthquake, but instead seethes and builds to a terrific sense of future war.

Yates also captures a newfound sense of scope. While lacking the finer point of patience, “Phoenix” licks the outer edge of the Kubrickian envelop; cinematographer Nicholas Hooper choosing a more steely, polished look for the film. He brings out the moody colors of Hogwarts and the final wizard battle royal, which could pass for a dynamic, uncontainable Epcot laser show if there wasn’t a noseless wizard running around the frame. If Chris Columbus bequeathed “Potter” with his warmth, Alfonso Cuaron infused mystery, and Mike Newell boosted the epic thunder, Yates lends the franchise an arresting impression of danger and angst that turns the story from one of continual wonder to one of survival and end-of-days preparation.

Also involved in this “Potter” installment is a fresh thematic coating pertaining to the idea of media manipulation, with Hogwarts and Harry struggling to stay one step ahead of “The Daily Prophet” and their usage of rumor and doubt to help suppress talk of Voldemort’s return. The newspaper takes a greater role in the film’s plot than ever before, adding to the smoothness of transitions between subplots and lending “Phoenix” a slight shiver of paranoia the series has never felt before.

Sure to delight the younger “Potter” fans is the continued sexualization of Harry, who locks lips with a classmate in “Phoenix,” demonstrating that future references to “alone time with your wand” could mean anything at this point. Radcliffe plays the teen anxiety solidly, and while the puberty leap of the three leads isn’t as pronounced as it was in “Goblet of Fire,” the feeling is still there in “Phoenix,” in the way Harry rebels against the establishment, Ron’s confidence ripens, and Hermione starts to take pleasure in breaking the rules. The wonder of kids shaking hands with magic for the first time had its charms, but count me in for these later years when the alchemy of the outside world is nowhere near as strongly felt as it is on the inside of the teen wizards.

With Umbridge wielding the color pink as switchblade (Staunton is perfectly cast), the abstract Voldemort nightmares increasing, Harry trusting in the familial comfort of Sirius, witnessing an honest-to-god Azkaban prison break (resulting in the release of Bellatrix Lestrange, played with rumpled heat by Helena Bonham Carter), and finding a newfound purpose for Snape which allows Alan Rickman to run away with the film yet again, “The Order of the Phoenix” satisfies on a multitude of levels both mighty and minute. Certainly it’s a transitory piece of filmmaking unable to rustle up a monster payoff, but it’s a wholly satisfying one; the best so far of the franchise, pushing Harry’s problems to unforeseen directions of gravitas and tension that I never perceived from the series before. Now, like millions of rabid “Potter” fanatics, I can’t wait to see where all this wizardry and ambiguity ends up. I’m hooked.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=16219&reviewer=404
originally posted: 07/11/07 14:59:15
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

7/26/09 David Worst of the series 3 stars
7/14/09 cody this movie is another good fllim in the harry potter series, that teacher is a butt!!! 4 stars
10/27/08 Michael M Yates creates an emotional connection with the audience when none of the previos flims did. 4 stars
10/26/08 Shaun Wallner Interesting Movie! 4 stars
9/01/08 Samantha Pruitt could have been longer, but still great, helens bonham carter was awesome! 5 stars
5/14/08 PAUL SHORTT AN EXERCISE IN PATIENCE AND LOYALTY, AT LEAST FOR FANS OF THE PAST TWO FILMS 2 stars
5/05/08 Franklin D Roosevelt Great movie 5 stars
4/26/08 Tyler Sciortino Some dodgy effects and a half-hour too short, but a great thrill with pitch-black darkness. 4 stars
3/21/08 Soph Very rushed; I almost expected Harry and co to start talking in squirrel voices. 2 stars
1/18/08 X Wang Yes, there are differences from the book - but still a very entertaining movie 4 stars
12/13/07 ES Enjoyable for a kid's movie 4 stars
11/15/07 Awesome People who only watch the movies will never get the whole story of the movie. 5 stars
11/15/07 PIMP It's the best one of all times 5 stars
11/07/07 Mohammad nawaz harry potter is great novel 4 stars
9/30/07 pamela ruvalcaba the movie is very good, i like daniel radcliffe 5 stars
9/08/07 pete total crap nothing like the book,totaly lost until I read the book great acting and effects 2 stars
8/27/07 Dan Leaves out key points from the book, and i have a fealing this movie ment to be longer. 2 stars
8/22/07 dude!!! this was a awsome movie but you need to read the book to get it 5 stars
8/21/07 SGlassman Worst movie. No character development which is important later on. 1 stars
8/17/07 Lilly potter Please get another director. Someone with imagination. 2 stars
8/13/07 U Don't Wanna Know This movie a few great effects, but thats all, if you havent read the book u're lost. 1 stars
8/12/07 Gurdeep People have to realize that books are one thing and movies another, I think it was great!! 5 stars
8/11/07 Kaitlin extremely disappointing! the acting was good but the film was nothing like the book. 1 stars
8/10/07 David's Sister It's totally gutted the masterful plot and character development. 1 stars
8/09/07 Neila Very disappointed ,worst hp ever 1 stars
7/31/07 Riktor Worst Film so far, Completly not like the book at all, Remove David yates Plz. 3 stars
7/29/07 sue the best one i have seen - dark and dangerous just like all good thrillers 5 stars
7/28/07 Navin R Whoo ,big letdown .This film stank 1 stars
7/27/07 Bitchflaps The worst Harry Potter film yet. I pray David Yates doesn't screw the next one up. 2 stars
7/26/07 sunny the best movie ever 5 stars
7/23/07 C Note Easily best of the series; Harry finally takes charge instead of being led around 5 stars
7/21/07 Randy This was nothing like the book! So many plot changes, it's unbelievable! 2 stars
7/20/07 Janet If you read the book, you hated the movie! They should have made it longer !!! 1 stars
7/19/07 miss elliott bloody brilliant 5 stars
7/19/07 Jake B Not a fan of the books, but this is a great instalment of a great FILM series 5 stars
7/18/07 melissa great movie..the battle and rebellion : really interesting..acting n effects : great 4 stars
7/18/07 Austin Wertman terrible 1 stars
7/18/07 orpy ho hum 3 stars
7/17/07 pin Entertaining yet, flat. Adaptation a bit superficial. They lost the story for the details. 3 stars
7/17/07 NeoMalfoy After the letdown of Goblet this was a releif best Potter adaption yet! 5 stars
7/17/07 SteveM A lot lot better than I thought it was going to be 5 stars
7/15/07 R K Felt let down. Effects / characters /acting great. Story line sucks and predictable. 3 stars
7/15/07 Jed Not flawless but it was entertaining 4 stars
7/15/07 Dark Enchantress it was good, im not a big harry potter fan, bit i enjoyed the movie 4 stars
7/15/07 KingNeutron Highly recommended - I see parallels of this film in my own life. 5 stars
7/14/07 Sourav Good one to watch...better than most of the other Harry Potter films expect maybe the 1st 1 5 stars
7/14/07 sarah not so good 2 stars
7/14/07 Matthew Extremely well done, the best of the Harry Potter movies 5 stars
7/14/07 Ole Man Bourbon Much better than the others I've seen--Order was suspenseful and even interesting at times. 4 stars
7/13/07 Adrian A perfect adaptiation of the most expository book in the series. 5 stars
7/12/07 Hello Stranger harry is completely tortured by the end of the film. no smiles. no action for 3/4 of film. 3 stars
7/12/07 Stacy Acting, casting, mood -- great as always. The adaptation this time seemed messy, though. 3 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  11-Jul-2007 (PG-13)
  DVD: 11-Dec-2007

UK
  12-Jul-2007 (12A)

Australia
  11-Jul-2007 (M)




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2014, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast