More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.4

Awesome: 6.32%
Worth A Look: 10.53%
Average30.53%
Pretty Bad: 22.11%
Total Crap30.53%

7 reviews, 53 user ratings


Latest Reviews

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

Death Note: Light Up the New World by Jay Seaver

Brawl in Cell Block 99 by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed


Quantum of Solace
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by MP Bartley

"The One where Bond doesn't say his name."
3 stars

Do the clothes maketh the man? That's the question that Casino Royale asked, rebooting the Bond franchise by taking him back to basics and stripping him, and the series, of many of its identifying touchstones. It was a risky move, and one that paid off with huge dividends, with Bond's best critical notices for a generation. Quantum of Solace takes this stripping back even further. There's still no Q or Moneypenny, but now there's now no ordering of vodka martinis of any ilk, no famous self-introduction and not one action scene is carried along on a wave of the famous riff. But as it turns out, the stripping away of these aspects is not so much the problem, it's the hollowness that lies underneath it all.

Kicking off with a bruising pre-credit car chase set mere moments after the end of Casino Royale, we're then treated to Jack White and Alicia Key's duet, which captures the drama of a Bond theme, but doesn't really trouble with us with a tune. The only time that a Bond film has arguably been a direct sequel to it's predecessor is Diamonds Are Forever following on from On Her Majesty's Secret Service. There, the pre-credit sequence had Bond hunting down Blofeld to avenge Tracey's death, a motivation quickly forgotten about in the rest of the film.

Quantum of Solace, then, makes an immediate impact by being the first Bond film to heavily rely on the storyline dealt with by its predecessor. Bond, still hurt by the betrayal and death of Vesper, sets out to further track down those responsible for her death, which involves infiltrating the mysterious organisation that employed Le Chiffre. This takes Bond from Haiti to Bolivia on the trail of Dominic Greene (Mathieu Almeric), a supposed environmental philanthropist, who has links with not just a recently deposed dictator, but with the British and American secret services as well. Accompanying him at various points is Camille (Olga Kurylenko), a Bolivian with an agenda of her own, and his new CIA friend, Felix Leiter (Jeffrey Wright).

The central drive behind Quantum of Solace is not so much a reaction to a specific threat, but a personal quest of revenge by Bond himself. This in itself is not new to the Bond series, as anyone familiar with Licence To Kill will testify. The difference here however, is that while Bond's trail of vengeance may be involving, it's a narrative that is drained of any sense of fun or escapism. There was a great thrill to Casino Royale, seeing Bond as MI5s rough diamond, without any of the usual tricks, catchphrases and gadgets to get him through, but that charge has gone here. Quantum of Solace is a curiously sour and dour experience instead. The removal of the predictable elements isn't the problem, as I completely fail to see the attraction of inserting the same moments over and over again, just to merely elicit a Pavlovian whooping effect. Instead, the film suffers because it's a series of setpieces and unpleasant moments barely held together by a sketch of a plot.


This is Bond as grim as we've ever seen him before. A moment where Bond stands over a recently dispatched assailant to ensure that he bleeds to death, before leaving without a comic quip, is arguably the coldest we've ever seen. The problem isn't that Bond is humourless (he's not as a moment of checking into a hotel proves), it's that the film is, and director Marc Forster never seems comfortable with balancing the character beats with the action scenes. The action is brutal and loud, but lacks the clarity and excitement that Martin Campbell brought to Casino Royale. We flit from location to location, but it feels more like Forster is aimlessly dealing out places at random than piecing together a coherent narrative. It's a mixture of singleminded revenge films like Get Carter and Point Blank, with the glamourous locales that we've come to expect. It's an uncomfortable mix at best, with an explosive ending that is frankly bizarre in its set up and completely at odds with the dark place of mind it leaves Bond contemplating (much more effective is the sinister and understated last confrontation between Bond and Greene. One of the few moments where you can clearly see what Forster was aiming for with the film).

It's absolutely typical of the film that the nastiest fate is reserved for the only character who cracks a genuine smile in the entire film. It's a moment that clearly references one of the most iconic scenes in the past films, and is powerful in its own right, highlighting the danger of getting too close to Bond - it just belongs to a better film, that's all.

Further sinkholing the film is the abysmal lack of a plot. Bond is tracking down Greene and his associates, but Greene's eventual aim is the weakest of any Bond villain. It's an attempt to give Bond some real life gravitas, but is terribly underbaked and is something you can't imagine any secret service being at all bothered about.

Cruising through the film with the demeanour of a pissed-off shark, is Craig. Regardless of the film around him, Craig is still an exceptional Bond. Weighed down with Vesper's cruel fate, this is a Bond who bleeds, who feels but still takes care of himself with a punishing ease. There are clearly some of the more usual Bond elements peeking through Craig's portrayal, such as his quick appropriation of a bike or his escape from a lift of four armed guards. But Craig pulls off the canny trick of making Bond human, whilst also portraying him as the coldest we've ever seen him. As he stalks off at the end of the film, there's a sense that he's still on his way to the Bond that we first met over forty years ago, but that in another film, Bond could easily be the villain. It's an interesting perspective that holds our attention through the chaotic action.

Dench gets more screentime as M than any other actor in the role, and their relationship is nicely played by the two, leading to one of the rare moments of humour in the film as he describes her to Camille. Camille herself is an interesting Bond girl - someone as damaged as Bond, with her own agenda - but Kurylenko has little chemistry with Craig, leaving their relationship frustratingly underdeveloped. Much better is Wright's Leiter, quickly becoming the definitive version and quietly stealing each scene he has. Most disappointing however, is Almaric's Greene. He goes for subtle, but the menace simply isn't there, and he comes across as a wet accountant, not particularly important and certainly not threatening, especially when trying to face off with Craig. The physical mismatch between them killing the drama of the confrontation, not helped by the small scale scheme hatched by Greene.

If one of the main aims of Quantum of Solace was to set up a third chapter for Craig's Bond of tracking down the mysterious organisation, then it does that well, with a definite sense of unfinished business at the end. But that's to its own detriment, as Quantum of Solace feels so insignificant in the grand scheme of things, that you'll be able to skip from Casino Royale to the next film and not feel that you've missed much.

A mixture of the cold, sterile world of the Harry Palmer flicks, Graham Greene and revenge films, Quantum of Solace is a strange, unwieldy beast. Only one moment stands out as being a particularly successful update of an old conceit (Bond interrupting a 21st century version of the super villain round table meeting zings with a cheeky style) and the flaws are glaringly apparent. Yet the more removed from my first viewing of it, the more inclined I am to be favourable to it. No, it's not great and it's worrying that just two films into the tenure of a new Bond, the reboot has wobbled, but a Bond film that is confident enough to not rely on any of the shop worn cliches, is one that seems to me to be worthy of attention and one to be given credit. It's a cold, dark, troubling film that rings hollow - yet it's these aspects, alongside its flaws, that slap you in the face like a an icy splash of water. I'm still with you, Mr Bond. But I hope the ride is going to get a little more enjoyable from now on.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=17375&reviewer=293
originally posted: 11/07/08 04:54:57
[printer] printer-friendly format  
James Bond: For more in the James Bond series, click here.

User Comments

9/12/17 morris campbell ok bond flick 3 stars
3/09/17 Louise (the actual one) Dreadful, badly-directed mess with a lame villain and even lamer theme song. Bad. 2 stars
3/25/13 KingNeutron Not very memorable, and the opening song is just awful 3 stars
10/20/10 Saif A. Khan Trust me...this film gets better each time you watch it. I think it is more of a companion 4 stars
9/23/10 Dr.Lao A Bond movie with none of the things one goes to see a Bond film for. 1 stars
7/14/10 matt its grown on me. good action, good performances, just a little short and a weak-ish plot 4 stars
1/05/10 James Smith poor direction ruined action scenes. Not Bond either! 2 stars
4/25/09 David Bad. Bad. Bad. But it's predecessor was fine and the best Bond in years. 1 stars
4/13/09 hawkeye impossible to make sense of..dissapointing 2 stars
4/11/09 Baloney Minor hiccups in action sequencing and pacing don't ruin an otherwise good spy flick. 4 stars
4/02/09 action movie fan good action weak plot and characters-daniel craig is a ppor excuse for bond 3 stars
3/29/09 Michael M. Boring, incomprehensible, and pointless movie. 1 stars
3/28/09 Monday Morning The Bond franchise needs to be put down. And Daniel Craig is loathsome. 2 stars
3/27/09 CTT Not bad; features Haggis' patented anti-American BS 4 stars
3/22/09 Tiimothy After the brilliant Casino Royale, this movie was a real let down. 2 stars
2/28/09 Steve Absolutely blew me away. One of the best Bonds. 5 stars
2/28/09 Sam Golden Disappointing beyond belief. First Bond movie that made me want to leave the cinema early 1 stars
2/19/09 craig this movie was missing one crucial ingredient: INVENTIVENESS. 2 stars
2/07/09 Jess Little plot, all action. Needn't have been Bond at all. Waste of my time! 1 stars
1/27/09 pin Good action, well acted, better than reviewed. 4 stars
1/25/09 matt badly paced and directed. a mediocre action movie than happens to star Bond. 3 stars
1/19/09 Jack Boring & Stupid. These nitwits even ripped-off Goldfinger. What does that tell U? 1 stars
1/16/09 Aesop Stop looking for Brosnan/Dalton/Moore/Connery. This Bond kicks @$$. 5 stars
1/13/09 Jessie I was sorely disappointed. Tried to like it, but failed. everything needed work 1 stars
12/25/08 Justin A real piece of crap. Just a completely stupid waste of time. Why Bond why? 1 stars
12/17/08 Marc N Horrible Bond movie, Daniel Craig looks like a thug not J Bond! 1 stars
12/14/08 WB5MXO Worst Bond movie ever. Choppy,hard to follow and the close up action scenes were very jerky 2 stars
12/13/08 Annie G So incredibly disappointing after CR, I actually felt a little sick. 2 stars
12/11/08 Jack Ryan Total Crap. The fun is gone from Bond. You couldn't pay me to watch it again! 1 stars
12/09/08 s close up of M applying & removing cold creme- WTF 1 stars
12/08/08 James Blonde This movie was ok but, im so sick of shaky/jerky camera action!!! 4 stars
12/07/08 Ian this movie restores purpose and place to the Bond character. cool as hell. 5 stars
12/06/08 Jared Robb Although this wasn't a charming JB movie, it was exciting. Which isn't always good. 3 stars
12/06/08 Steven Gilpin This movie was unbelievably cool. 5 stars
12/05/08 jim Such a disappointment. Did James crack one smile in the entire movie? 2 stars
12/05/08 Jerry Orchard the worst Bodn film ever. Danile Craig please go home, James Bond please come back! 1 stars
12/01/08 Jiz Stealing water from third-world countries? What happened to the GOOD villains? 1 stars
11/30/08 Koitus Ugh... Story was hard to follow; choppy editing for action scenes, too... 1 stars
11/27/08 littlered too "shoot'em up for me" 2 stars
11/24/08 "Big Brother" The DIRECTOR ruined this movie, turned what could've been just passable into plain mediocre 2 stars
11/21/08 aliceinwonderland There is only one word for this movie: BORING 1 stars
11/20/08 Anthony Feor Quantum of Solace, directed by Michael Bay. Did anyone know what was going on? 2 stars
11/20/08 David Hey Louise, don't use big words you do not understand 5 stars
11/19/08 Bnorm I enjoyed this movie I don't really understand this amount of negative reviews 4 stars
11/19/08 mark gibson I really enjoyed it, yeh it messes with the formula but so what! 5 stars
11/19/08 Richard Remington Roger Moore is the only true James Bond,the other ones are all a bunch of clowns! 1 stars
11/17/08 Louise Badly directed, incoherent plot, lame villain - very disappointing! 2 stars
11/17/08 David G A visualy imaginative, thrilling follow up to Casino Royale 4 stars
11/16/08 mr.mike Worth seeing despite a good deal of problems. 4 stars
11/16/08 Chode Pretty lame. 2 stars
11/15/08 Ed Blackwood How to get sea sick in a theater seat 2 stars
11/15/08 Darkstar Lots of action, not as good as Casino Royal. 4 stars
11/15/08 PAUL SHORTT OVERWROUGHT, INCOHERENT AND DATED 1 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  14-Nov-2008 (PG-13)
  DVD: 24-Mar-2009

UK
  N/A

Australia
  14-Nov-2008
  DVD: 24-Mar-2009



[trailer] Trailer




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast