More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.88

Awesome: 0%
Worth A Look: 19.05%
Average52.38%
Pretty Bad: 26.19%
Total Crap: 2.38%

5 reviews, 12 user ratings



Monsters vs. Aliens
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by brianorndorf

"They're ready to believe you"
4 stars

It’s come to be in the great cinema spectrum that Pixar makes cinema and Dreamworks makes cartoons. These days, I prefer the laughs, and “Monsters vs. Aliens” is a cracking animated comedy that takes wonderful care of its characters and pace, presenting a brisk, frequently hilarious romp that rarely pauses to reflect. The simplicity is refreshing.

On the day of her wedding, Susan (voiced by Reese Witherspoon) is hit by a meteor, causing her to grow 44 extra feet high and ruin her special day. Abducted by government forces, Susan is sent to a detention center for monsters, including fishman The Missing Link (Will Arnet), mad scientist Dr. Cockroach (Hugh Laurie), gelatinous blob B.O.B. (Seth Rogan), and towering bug Insectosaurus. Hopeful that she might someday be able to return to her life with vain fiancé Derek (Paul Rudd), Susan is instead rechristened Ginormica by team leader General W.R. Monger (Kiefer Sutherland) and sent into battle when an alien nation led by Gallaxhar (Rainn Wilson) attacks Earth. Building a team with her new friends, the monsters attempt to infiltrate Gallaxhar’s defenses, only to find their own powers restricted by mounting self-doubt.

Breezy is an excellent way to describe “Monsters.” Directors Rob Letterman and Conrad Vernon have built a cheerful animated motion picture that keeps the comedic situations coming and the characters in full quirk mode, while tinkering with iconic sci-fi and war movie circumstances that will please the older crowds. It’s a colorful fantasia of slapstick and epic combat that winds up more effective than anticipated, forgoing traditional dramatic interstitials to plow ahead as a pure farce.

Designed with an eye toward 1950’s genre touches, “Monsters” is a visually impressive film, multiplied a thousand times over if viewed in its native 3-D format, where the depth of destruction is transformed into an exhaustively immersive event. Certainly the production is aiming for cartoon standards to separate good (ugly) vs. evil (uglier), yet the minimalism is a joy to observe, playing up the exaggerated angles of the film. The animation is expressive and fluid, with phenomenal attention to physical humor and, in the case of Ginormica, building-smashing gravity.

The cast assembled to bring the characters to life also contributes greatly to the jolly tone of the harshly titled picture. While I could do without Wilson’s elongated delivery as Gallaxhar (seriously, was there no one else for the job?), the ensemble picks up the slack with merry performances. As the core monster team, Laurie, Arnett, and especially Rogen consistently enliven the picture with their mix of askew heroism and general witless behavior, often stealing the film with their jovial fallibility and fearless teamwork. Even Witherspoon manages to thaw herself and have some fun, making for a gentle and blessedly quick dramatic core of doubt as Susan realizes her immaculate life wasn’t very ideal after all, pushing her into empowerment consciousness.

“Monsters” only stumbles when trying too hard to either be cutesy (it’s the second animated film in under a year to use the “Axel F” theme as a punchline) or satiric (Stephen Colbert as The President invites uncomfortable silences). When back on solid ground, the film is a blast as a straightforward, silly-hearted adventure, literally bursting through the screen to entertain as vigorously as it possibly can.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=17540&reviewer=404
originally posted: 03/28/09 01:08:52
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

1/20/14 Charles Tatum Fun film, with enough satire and laughs for adults 4 stars
10/25/10 Dr.Lao Could some one explain to Dreamworks what "funny" means, after Shreck they forgot 2 stars
1/21/10 Stanley Thai A fluffy, safe movie that is, at times, funny. It's no Piixar. 3 stars
10/01/09 zenny not funny, silly plot. mediocre otherwise 2 stars
8/27/09 starmage2 Great film to take kids to, with some moments that adults will enjoy. 3 stars
8/22/09 Jenny Tullwartz Wizard of Oz meets Fantastic 4 might've worked, but IXNAY on my super exgirlfriend subplot! 2 stars
8/16/09 Tiffany Faye Hawthorne Isnt Reese's spoon now withered enough, she could move on to withering a fork or something? 2 stars
8/14/09 Meredith Harshaw Beuaty and the Beast just doesn't work when Beauty IS the beast! 1 stars
4/14/09 KingNeutron This was a very silly movie, mostly for kids and not much besides SFX 3 stars
4/03/09 Leanne I wouldn't go if you don't have kids, but it was cute. My 3 and 5-year olds loved it. 4 stars
4/03/09 Ming I like the Golden Bridge special effect 3 stars
3/27/09 PAUL SHORTT FOR A 3-D FILM, ITS APPALLINGLY ONE-DIMENSIONAL 2 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  27-Mar-2009 (PG)
  DVD: 29-Sep-2009

UK
  03-Apr-2009 (PG)

Australia
  02-Apr-2009 (PG)
  DVD: 29-Sep-2009



[trailer] Trailer




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast