More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.7

Awesome: 7.94%
Worth A Look26.98%
Average: 15.87%
Pretty Bad: 25.4%
Total Crap: 23.81%

6 reviews, 27 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Roman J. Israel, Esq. by Peter Sobczynski

Coco (2017) by Peter Sobczynski

Prey (2017) by Jay Seaver

Lu Over the Wall by Jay Seaver

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by alejandroariera

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by Peter Sobczynski

Justice League by Peter Sobczynski

Mumon: The Land of Stealth by Jay Seaver

Geek Girls by Jay Seaver

Fashionista by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Hamlet (2000)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Greg Muskewitz

"The additions are subtractions, and it is more austere then it originated."
1 stars

This newest version of "Hamlet," a mere three or four years since Kenneth Branagh's epic version, never should have happened. Miramax should have shot it dead in the water. I never wasted my time with "William Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet" with DiCaprio and Danes a few years back, knowing locales had been updated to modern times, while it stayed spoken in the Elizabethan verse. If I had know this "Hamlet" was the same, I would have skipped it all together too; obviously, I did not know.

Director, and also adaptor Michael Almereyda does move "Hamlet" to modern day New York with modern day inconveniences (hand held cameras, cell phones, Polaroid cameras, etc.). But then Almereyda kills it by keeping the dialogue in its Shakespearian verse. Ethan Hawke is Hamlet, and not a very good one, for what's the point of Hamlet is he's not mad, not feigning madness, and not filled with angst? He's on leave from film school (all dolled up trendily with yellow shades and a beanie, somehow forgetting he's white) to attend his mother's (Diane Venora) marriage to her brother-in-law (Kyle MacLachlan). "His lord" of course having poisoned the reigning king (Sam Sheperd), the CEO of Denmark Corporations. (They're also located out of the Hotel El Sinore.) "Melancholia" is arisen, Hamlet is requested to stay as Laertes (Liev Schrieber), son of Polonius (Bill Murray), brother of Ophelia (Julia Stiles), returns to France. It only becomes all the more plotting removing it out of it's fin de siecle.

Polonius is nosey where he shouldn't be, and interferes with the "tenders" Ophelia has received from Hamlet. It plods along, only more butchered than Zefferelli's version (though here, Fortinbras is at least mentioned) and with a soap opera mentality. Shakespeare's text is not only desecrated by the impropritousness of the usage and lack of utilizing the words effectively, but by the gradual downplay of the everyday hodgepodge shown. The lyric becomes boring, dull, dreary, and ultimately a nuisance. Almereyda keeps in tact the unnecessary, and plays with the important, putting it all out of order. The choppiness and bleakness is only a sign of pure amateurity.

At one point, Hamlet's scheme to catch Claudius (though never mentioned by name) is the "film/video," "The Mousetrap" which is a compellation of scenes edited together from a boat-load of Blockbuster rentals (anyone want to guess who will have it Guaranteed In Stock?). And any member knows, there's no more than five movies rented out at one time. Besides, the cashier looked deader than any Blockbuster employee I've ever seen. (Plus, I never realized "Gone with the Wind," Kubrick's "Lolita," and a host of others are "action" movies as displayed in their display.)

One conjecture I can offer for the horrible idea of keeping it in verse is the incapability of the actors themself, to perform it. The original performers were unable to do it realistically then, but at least had the rythmic patterns of the iambic pentameter down. And to put the lyric in today's time with today's people, only makes it even more stiff and rigid. No matter how convicingly "performed," of which really only Kyle MacLachlan, Diane Venora, Sam Sheperd, and at whim Julia Stiles and Liev Schrieber were capable of, everyone else floundered, flubbed, and fluttered. No matter how you look at it, there's no matching today's gestures with that dialogue --not a hand-movement, a twitch of the brow, or a crack of the lip.

The production design was nicely decored, a pleasing, if not a little overly dark and saturated look by cinematographer John de Borman, as well as an often decent score by Carter Burwell. However, the gaffer on this needs to be shot. I counted at least three separate scenes where the microphone dropped into the camera frame, and it was usually in multiples of two or three. Almereyda showed no style or finess, just a disregard and personal ignominy for the material he filmed.

Hawke, trying his damnedest to be cocky and toothful like a younger, nasaler Tom Cruise, failed. The beady-eyed MacLachlan looks out of shape, and it felt as if many were reading off of a TelePromTer. And Julia Stiles, taking only what they gave, as the camera graces her pale and cute face with a dab of flesh nose reminescent of of Millicent's in Evenlyn Waugh's short story "On Guard," can only take what she gets and skip, not run, with it. Her costuming is much more mod, much more exotic. All the rest --Murray, Steven Zahn, etc.-- even despite any pentameter they may think they're using, is even further subtractive. Any gambles Almereyda or anyone else took, lost.

Final Verdict: F+

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=1758&reviewer=172
originally posted: 07/30/00 06:20:49
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

2/11/10 Jeff Wilder Interesting approach that works somewhat but not totally. 4 stars
7/12/09 the dork knight A stylish art project, nothing more. And...Bill Murray, WTF? 3 stars
6/11/08 PAUL SHORTT VISUALLY, THE FILM IS RIVETING, USING THE SETTING WITH REAL STYLE AND EMOTION 4 stars
5/08/07 Beef Cake Fell asleep, except when I heard gunshots. 2 stars
2/27/07 CRAIG TURKEVICH LETS LEAVE SHAKESPEARE TO THE BRITS 4 stars
10/10/06 eork AWFUL: Ethan Hawke made me sick, as did Stiles. The film completley slaughtered itself 1 stars
6/05/06 Annelanti if ya wanna do modern Shakespear use moddern language 1 stars
5/30/06 Taoufik Khotbi the 2000 version is a distruction of the script and a clear cut from shakespeare's main mes 2 stars
6/19/05 farnqwo Having just read the play it was a very entertaining show 5 stars
6/07/05 athena they have made Omlet out of Hamlet 1 stars
5/01/04 your daddy 1 stars
3/23/04 lyrad Gnahc Hillariaously Stupid 1 stars
10/01/02 thejames Intresting take on Hamlet. These reviewers are pretty tight assed. Enjoyable and good actin 4 stars
4/29/02 Parker I liked it. 5 stars
1/10/02 Prudence IT SUCKED!!! 1 stars
11/21/01 Symon Black Mercilessly cut, monochromatic and numb, this is the worst Shakespeare I have ever seen. 1 stars
8/07/01 Hoosiergal22 Should have had Liev in the title role; his Hamlet at the Public Theater was f**ing awesome 3 stars
7/03/01 The Stuff I might of been better with modern language and same story. I sense everyone was lost . 2 stars
4/25/01 Spetters The makers didn,t quite succeed, but a movie that hsa a good Hawke perf is alreadysomething 3 stars
2/15/01 *~Danielle*Ophelia~* (formerly KyLe*BrOfLoVsKi) Better and less pleased-with-itself than the updated Romeo and Juliet. 4 stars
1/12/01 svetlana wow...i really enjoyed it and i guess i'm not pretentious enough to pick out its every flaw 5 stars
12/07/00 Christopher Myst Duncan Shepherd said it, the worst Hamlet rendition ever! Good bashing, Greg 1 stars
10/07/00 Jürgen Wimmer silly and boring 1 stars
7/08/00 skye chapman did not engage me. TITUS it ain't 2 stars
6/23/00 Ramsay Interesting adaptation, liked background video compilments, acting was too weak. 3 stars
6/12/00 FilmStar I loved this...Much better than R&J, a lot deeper...Murray and Stiles were great 5 stars
5/14/00 Lucas This movie was a nothing more than a brilliant display of a classic story in modern day. 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  12-May-2000 (R)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast