More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 12.66%
Worth A Look: 24.05%
Pretty Bad: 2.53%
Total Crap: 7.59%

7 reviews, 37 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Pick of the Litter by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Peter Sobczynski

House With A Clock In Its Walls, The by Peter Sobczynski

Life Itself (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

Unity of Heroes by Jay Seaver

Hanagatami by Jay Seaver

Predator, The by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Rob Gonsalves

Madeline's Madeline by Jay Seaver

Won't You Be My Neighbor? by Rob Gonsalves

subscribe to this feed

[] Buy posters from this movie
by Dust For Eyes

"Plods along"
3 stars

Dinosaur is a combination of utter commitment to realism and utter abandonment of it. Itís a strange and curious mix. Why bother with one if youíre going to have the other? I mean if youíre going to have them talking why not have them wearing backward baseball caps and hanging out with Jar Jar Binks?

I enjoyed Dinosaur - it was high quality filmmaking and sets new standards in the craft. I didnít hate that they were talking per se and the film looks great.

However there were some strange decisions made in this film - None of which matters if you just want to entertain kids, but Iím going to talk about it anyway because I think the film could have been better.

Itís not that they were talking - it was what they were saying. Saying things like "woah," and, "hey." Did Disney have to do that? The dialogue and the talking isnít that bad since you know itís coming, but there are nevertheless some strange and annoying choices of words and the type of voices used.

Then there were the skin tones. Skin colouring for dinosaurs is pure guesswork. There is reasonable evidence of skin shape and texture, but colouration is anyoneís guess and is up to the artist to make the decision. In Jurassic Park they went for basic black/grey for the tyrannosaurus rex and the Ďraptors. The colour was just right because it made them look so *mean*. In Walking With Dinosaurs there was a bit more adventurousness with subtle shadings and even stripes - A reasonable assumption; Todayís reptiles are multi-coloured and it looked convincing.

In Dinosaur, Disney uses pastel shadings and tones on the iguanodons.


Whose idea was that!?

Itís an example of the mixing up cuteness for entertainmentís sake with realism. Itís rather befuddling.

During Dinosaurís scenes set in darkness the pastels were turned down and here the film is much more effective.

Disney is at its best when itís trying to scare the nappies off the kids. In both the original and new versions of Fantasia the scary bits are the highlights. Most notably the nightmarish sorcererís apprentice sequence where that lazy bum of a rodent sets upon an out of control broom with an axe.


So in Dinosaur itís the scary bits that are best. Mostly set in darkness or low light when the dinosaurs donít look quite so cute and they set upon trying to eat each other. I heard one kid say, "Is that dinosaur going to wake up Mummy?" To which I wanted to reply, "NO. Itís DEAD and it's going to HELL!"

Kids love being scared - or more to the point, kids like surviving scary things. Why else is R.L. Stine so popular? At the time of the scary bit they donít like it, but afterwards they get a kick out still being alive and want to do it again.

Disney prided itself in the effort it went to in creating realistic grass. Fantastic. 10 out of 10 for effort. The grass helped the sense of oasis-ness for the destination of the dinosaurs. Only thing is there was no grass during the Cretaceous period. None. Zip.

According to Walking With Dinosaur there is no fossil record of grass to well after the dinosaursí extinction. So why did Disney put in grass? Lack of research or for dramatic effect? If itís the former it is sloppy. If itís the latter then again I ask why bother? Itís just not necessary and just adds to the crazy mix of realism and abandonment of realism that seems to go further than just getting them to talk.

Deserts? There are deserts in the film as well - didnít the whole planet have a tropical/sub tropical feel to it during that time?

So was all this reality twisting with the talking and other things really necessary? Was it needed to tell a story?

In Walking With Dinosaurs there was plenty of story telling and drama going on in each episode. There was some liberty taken in setting up those stories (which the program has been criticised), but there wasnít a complete neglect of a sense of realism. Walking With Dinosaurs showed that there did not have to be a complete disregard for realism to successfully tell a story.

So Dinosaurís reality twisting wasnít really necessary.

This abandonment of realism did not have to be done to still have the film achieve its primary goal: to be entertaining for children (and adults) while achieving photo-realism. If the twisting wasnít done it would have been an even better film. Thereís nothing wrong with wanting something to be better, and Dinosaur definitely could have been better.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 06/23/00 11:50:39
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

3/23/12 Quigley Painfully unfunny and a very tired story. The visuals and animation are incredible, though. 3 stars
8/30/09 CTT Too close to "The Land Before Time," but still good stuff 4 stars
8/29/08 Shaun Wallner My daughter loves this movie! 5 stars
8/10/06 Dragon The Artist Yet another mushfest, moral laced Disney flick,but Iliked it as a child. 3 stars
7/12/06 Matthew Sutton Hey Joe you suck, Dinosaur is the greatest 5 stars
6/28/06 joe koski BOO you stink!!! 1 stars
11/11/05 Mark Radburn I love Disney Dinosaur better than Finding Nemo. 5 stars
8/17/05 ES Good, the whole 'Dinosaurs as humanitarians' thing was a stretch but the kids love it 4 stars
7/05/05 Ben Farmillo Extremely Well-made movie. A masterpiece 5 stars
2/27/05 Dr. Lecter rescued by its wondrous JNH music 3 stars
1/09/05 Luke Blackadder Dinosaur is more, more more fun than Boring Ice Age 5 stars
11/27/04 Steven Brady Totally Awesome one of Disney's Greatest 5 stars
11/01/04 Mark This is The World's Greatest Disney Movie ever 5 stars
10/25/04 DM Boring, overwrought and preachy - some good bits, though 2 stars
4/25/04 Alex A normal film 3 stars
2/03/03 Turtle Don't gimme that crap about the CGI. See it for what it is: A big pile of dino droppings. 1 stars
1/01/02 Andrew Carden Boring and Badly Worked Cartoon. 1 stars
10/16/01 Connoisseur pathetically boring and uninvolving! perhaps the flattest characters ever in a movie! 1 stars
4/09/01 Gary Looks real, but I have to agree that Disney is dead. Very boring. 3 stars
2/08/01 Mario Rodgers Anybody who grades this higher than Land Before Time needs his brain retooled. 3 stars
12/28/00 Turtle Disney is dead. 1 stars
9/09/00 Jed Over-simplistic storyline is a tiny complaint. A great movie for this year. 5 stars
7/05/00 Mic "JP" meets "TLK" meets "Tarzan". Ordinary, formulaic plot, but awesome animation! 3 stars
6/25/00 Purple Monster "Jurassic Park" meets "The Lion King" !!!! 3 stars
6/05/00 Jed So it has a simple story. SO WHAT! THIS MOVIE IS GREAT! 5 stars
5/27/00 PhilmPhreak See it for the animation - NOT the story! 4 stars
5/26/00 Maclay01 They shouldn't have stared talking - Walt would've done it that way 3 stars
5/24/00 grunter "Land Before Time" done on an eMac - at least they didn't sing this time 3 stars
5/23/00 ladislau masterpiece! dreamworks should hide for a while... 5 stars
5/22/00 k.tomkowski Dumb plot, too naive and predictable even for kids! A wasted chance. 4 stars
5/22/00 The Bomb 69 visuals were the best ever, writing was simplistic 4 stars
5/21/00 Cinesuerte Land Before Time 2000 if only there was a version with no talking that would be a HIT 4 stars
5/21/00 Captain Highcrime I hear in the sequel, the dinosaurs on going to appear on "Millioniare." 4 stars
5/21/00 Blackbird Great CG, but couldn't balance realism with family fare. Gave me mixed feelings 3 stars
5/19/00 John The best movie ever 1 stars
5/17/00 The Rock Mesa thinks the Love Monkey was Jar-Jar Binks II 2 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  19-May-2000 (PG)


  15-Jun-2000 (PG)

Directed by
  Eric Leighton
  Ralph Zondag

Written by

  D.B. Sweeney
  Kiefer Sutherland
  Joan Plowright
  Alfre Woodard
  Samuel E. Wright
  Juliana Maguiles

Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast