More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.51

Awesome: 8.54%
Worth A Look: 13.41%
Average: 26.83%
Pretty Bad: 23.17%
Total Crap28.05%

6 reviews, 46 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets by Rob Gonsalves

Roman J. Israel, Esq. by Peter Sobczynski

Coco (2017) by Peter Sobczynski

Prey (2017) by Jay Seaver

Lu Over the Wall by Jay Seaver

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by alejandroariera

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by Peter Sobczynski

Justice League by Peter Sobczynski

Mumon: The Land of Stealth by Jay Seaver

Geek Girls by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Terminator Salvation
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Erik Childress

"OH – NOT GOOD FOR YOU!"
1 stars

The summer of ’09 has been populated thus far with two prequels and a prequel that became a sequel. The fourth Terminator film is a sequel on the timeline of the series but still comes before the time a certain Schwarzenegger model was created. It is the beginnings of our hero, John Connor, even though we’ve watched his adventures and legend grow in a trilogy of films. After 25 years of waiting, he’s all grown up and waiting to save mankind and potentially even a summer populated by the ridiculous (Wolverine, Angels & Demons) and the wildly overrated (Star Trek). Save us John Connor! Wait, what’s that? Joseph McGinty is calling the shots? The auteur of Charlie’s Angels known as McG? Who are we kidding? We’ve known this for a while but keep trying to forget this little nugget that one of the best and most consistent action franchises had been handed over to this guy. Press on though we did trying to think positive that our memories and some big dumb action would save the day and pull us through the fourth chapter. It’s safe to say though that the machines have won this battle, using a title as sad irony as audiences will be forced to slog through one of the most inept screenplays for a big budget blockbuster we’ve been privy to in some time.

Taking place in the year 2018 (14 years after Judgment Day began in the previous film), resistance fighters continue to fight the war against Skynet, the military software that became self-aware and wiped out most of the human race. For those who missed Linda Hamilton’s opening narration to Terminator 2, you get it printed out here nearly verbatim. John Connor (Christian Bale) has been called “a false prophet” for all the knowledge he presumably relegated to his military comrades. After discovering the blueprints though for the next model of Terminator (the T-800s), where human tissue will disguise the metal exoskeleton, an attack leaves John the only survivor. He is picked up by the underwater resistance, some joint American/Russian submarine base led by General Ashdown (Michael Ironside) who enlists John in a plot to take down Skynet Central, even at the cost of all the human lives now being harvested by the machines.

Across the landscape having escaped from that initial attack unscathed, Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington), a former death row inmate who donated his body to science fiction, meets up with a young Kyle Reese (Anton Yelchin, who was barely believable as a young Walter Koenig let alone Michael Biehn) and his even younger, mute sidekick Star (Jadagrace). Kyle hasn’t earned his stripes in the resistance yet and certainly doesn’t know that someday he will get to have sex with Sarah Connor and spawn John. After he’s captured, Marcus finds Blair Williams (Moon Bloodgood), a pilot for the Connor crew that also includes Barnes (Common) and John’s pregnant doctor wife, Kate (Bryce Dallas Howard). Marcus gets Blair out of a couple scrapes and she tries to return the favor when a landmine finally makes a dent in the chiseled loner. Enough dents to show some of that chisel came courtesy of a blowtorch. For underneath his wounds is the very exoskeleton that has been hunting down what’s left of humanity. This is news not only to our heroes but also to Marcus him/itself.

The haphazard description of the plot is no accident since Terminator Salvation can’t make up its mind what story its trying to tell. Our brains keep telling us that is John Connor’s story. It always has been. So then why does the film provide more concentration on this Marcus character? Beginning with the impossible feat of creating a more stupefying prologue than this summer’s Wolverine Origins, Marcus takes the spotlight from Bale’s John, turning him into a supporting player in his own franchise. The way John Connor is written (and eventually played by Bale), he’s a one-note scowl-a-minute that runs counter to the eventual message it tries to wrangle in about the differences between man and metal. So why not a little Marcus to take the reigns and spin things off for future Terminator fans? Because the film doesn’t know what to do with him either.

From the early trailers, there was evidence to suggest that screenwriters John D. Brancato and Michael Ferris (responsible for such gems as the giant alligator film, Primeval, and giant turd, Catwoman) had seen a few episodes of Battlestar Galactica in their day. The behavioral patterns of a machine who thinks they are a man seemed right out of the deservedly acclaimed retooling of that sci-fi series. Marcus’ plight though (aside from the obvious hints of the opening scene where he signs the Cyberdyne forms to take away his Australian accent) doesn’t take shape until midway through the film giving us little time to fully grasp all the implications of his situation, but certainly enough to recognize all the inconsistencies.

The output of Cyberdyne labs have always been tracked in easy numerical multipliers (like Atari home game systems.) The T-600 were the prototypes with rubber skin over the purely metal Terminators. T-800s were the harder to spot models with blood and sweat. The T-1000 was liquid metal and so on. The condemned-to-death Marcus (whom we know little more than his involvement in the death of his brother and two cops) is goaded into his donation by Dr. Serena Kogan (an inexplicably cast Helena Bonham Carter) who is concerned about the future of the human race. What she’s so paranoid about in 2003, a full year before Judgment Day, is anybody’s guess. Now we’re meant to believe that Marcus has no knowledge of what’s become of his body. He doesn’t even seem phased by his indestructibility that is tested more than once. His previous memories intact and all, fine, we’ll buy that. Precisely how are the machines using this guy as an infiltrator then? There’s no suggestion that his every move is being tracked by Skynet making him an ideal spy. The machines can’t even find Connor’s base despite having Terminating Water Moccasins in a pond on its outskirts.

So if Marcus believes he’s human and has no mission, what precisely are the machines expecting him to do? Are they awaiting him to discover his true nature so he can do more than to look down and scream…TWICE?! If Connor has just discovered the plans for the T-800, what model is Marcus supposed to be? You certainly don’t start with a complete package like him and then regress to Schwarzenegger’s Model 101. And in 2018, John hasn’t become THE leader yet. Sure he’s got a ragtag group and makes the occasional Tokyo Rose broadcast, but in the opening mission it’s made very clear – “you are not leading this mission, Connor.” Then why has Skynet been hunting down Connor for years? He doesn’t smash their defense grid until 2029 which is when the original T-800 is sent back to 1984 to destroy his mother. Why the elaborate trap using Kyle Reese when the system should have no knowledge he’s John’s father? Shouldn’t Ferris & Brancato know a little bit of this since they penned Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines?

That film has become some kind of pariah in the years since its release. I still believe that director Jonathan Mostow (the more than competent action director of Breakdown and U-571) delivered a tautly executed successor to the Cameron films and can be easily defended over most by-the-number actioners simply for its ultra-destructive tow truck chase and surprisingly dark ending. Those ready to jump on the bandwagon for the fourth picture (as if Brett Ratner had somehow ruined the series) need to be prepared for a long jump since McG’s sense of direction is like a blind man who never has to turn left or right. And I don’t put the fault entirely at McG’s door. He’s certainly not learned anything in the storytelling department (even after mucking up a completely by-the-numbers story like We Are Marshall) but at least he gives a few of the action scenes a little room to breathe. The biggest set piece though is basically something that may have been cut out of Transformers and suggests that Marcus may be a thinly veiled microcosm of McG himself; a robotic entity with no identity but a nickname and a few memories of things he saw over the years. Like the sentinels from The Matrix, the plucked-up people and cattle calls from Spielberg’s War of the Worlds, General Grievous from Revenge of the Sith the "you arrogant ass, you've killed us" moment from The Hunt for Red October and about another half-dozen lifted derivatives. He even works in a reference to his television show, Chuck, as Marcus has a Johnny Mnemonic “O”-face when he scans over the entire history of Skynet. A shame Brancato & Ferris couldn’t get their hands on a Terminator intersect.

If the Terminator series was defined as a series of extraordinary set pieces with the occasional nugget of sci-fi ideology about where the human race is headed, then the least Salvation could have been is a big, dumb summer spectacular. Light on ideas but heavy on action. The appearance of guns and explosions are there but none of it makes a lasting impression on us from one scene into the next and the hunt for a PG-13 rating has certainly neutered the film beyond repair. There’s nothing more unsightly than an escapee being mowed down by a minigun and then merely slumping over a fence. With the first hour, in particular, alternating between John and Marcus, audiences may feel this is what Cormac McCarthy’s The Road would look like if directed by Michael Bay. The smarter Brancato and Ferris try to get by interjecting 101 parallels between the human heart and the soulless machines (and the danger of us behaving just like them) the dumber Terminator Salvation becomes. By the time it looks like Richard Dawson’s Running Man crew created another stunt body double to get audiences all riled up, all the nostaglia has been sucked out thanks to a script unworthy of a direct-to-video sequel. At film's end, I'm unsure over precisely who has been saved? John Connor? Humanity? Or audiences who will save countless hours by never feeling the need to revisit this film again.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=18111&reviewer=198
originally posted: 05/21/09 14:00:00
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

10/30/16 morris campbell crap moving on 1 stars
10/04/14 chuck SHOULD BE NO STARS-----WTF IS THIS CRAP 1 stars
4/16/14 Charles Tatum Not terrible, but you didn't see it, so we suffer ANOTHER reboot 4 stars
1/07/14 bored mom Drop the repeated one-liners, and add more T-600s. The big robot HK mech was funny, though. 3 stars
10/01/13 Jeff Wilder Bleh 2 stars
1/18/12 Marc DC Makes T3 look like oscar material. Enough said. 2 stars
11/27/11 AEB Nothing new but exciting and worth the ticket price. 3 stars
8/08/11 Chris F Crap without Arnie 1 stars
6/27/11 DR Much better than many would have you believe. However, some plot points fall short. 4 stars
2/20/11 Richard79 Put it in the boxset with AvP and Live Free or Dire Hard. 1 stars
9/30/10 Aaron Smith Good to see post-JD, and cool new machines, but characters underdeveloped. 4 stars
8/24/10 Total Crap Better than T3 at least, but they re-use and recycle so many damn scenes from the first 2. 3 stars
5/01/10 mr.mike Better than I expected - plus Bale's not in it that much 4 stars
4/30/10 Jerome Cook wow that looked just like young Arnold! thats incredible and nobody even mentioned it!!!!!! 3 stars
1/06/10 KingNeutron Nice to see Ironside, but definitely could have been done better. Meh. 3 stars
12/27/09 randy todger dumbed down shite.McG stick to producing supernatural on tv.you are shit 2 stars
11/14/09 Meep Started out well enough but quickly degenerated into franchise disrespecting crap, T3>T4 2 stars
7/28/09 damalc should've stuck to my guns when i swore off Terminator movies after T3 2 stars
7/14/09 Linda The Image of the Terminator's have no effect on me like the first one, not scary or thirill 3 stars
7/03/09 roger federer This is a film that should have never been made 1 stars
6/17/09 JR Wow. What a piece of garbage. 1 stars
6/10/09 Koitus I thought it was okay - if you're a fan of the first 3. "R" rating probably wld hv bn btr. 3 stars
6/09/09 kerry i personally loved it - Bale's voice got on my nerves, but Yelchin was awesome as usual!!!! 5 stars
6/09/09 Kitana37 Remarkably decent...much better than I thought it was gonna be 4 stars
6/09/09 Abhishek Chakraborty Enjoyed it. Explosions with a purpose. makes more sense than Star trek 5 stars
6/06/09 Vince Best movie so far this year 4 stars
6/05/09 sumixam Loved it 5 stars
6/05/09 gc Plot tied in the other movies perfectly, good fx too 4 stars
6/04/09 owen fantastic movie well done mcg loved it 5 stars
6/01/09 K. Sear A serious improvement over part 3. 4 stars
5/30/09 Man Out 6 Bucks Blair Witch and Cloverfield meet the T-600. The future will be very, very loud. 1 stars
5/29/09 D McG is an amateurish hack and this movie falls in line with the rest of his hackwork 1 stars
5/29/09 daisysalter Sam Worthington carries the film, which is not great, but a good summer action film. 4 stars
5/27/09 Kyle Reese Knew we'd be in trouble when it was announced it would rate PG-13 2 stars
5/26/09 Ole Man Bourbon Reminded me of Uve Boll a little bit 1 stars
5/25/09 Lemoine Soundly kicked Wolverine & Star Trek's rear. 5 stars
5/25/09 travis Very disappointing, hell, the series on FOX was far more impressive 2 stars
5/25/09 jon robinson i think the movie just was hollow. it felt like they made this one JUST to make another 3 stars
5/25/09 Brandon Allin Visually spectacular, but lacking elsewhere. 3 stars
5/24/09 g. not terrible but could have been better 3 stars
5/24/09 Matt pretty great, not flawless, but well done. 4 stars
5/24/09 Jeff Teixeira Totally inconsistent with the Terminator series. 1 stars
5/24/09 Darkstar Much better than T3, good action, still think McG sucks donkey balls 4 stars
5/24/09 Greg No way. Terrible. I'm still upset. Not worth the wait (And I even liked T3!) 1 stars
5/22/09 Dan Johnson Good movie 5 stars
5/21/09 luke Ummm.....I thought it was good and not derserving more than 1 star, dont shoot me 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  21-May-2009 (PG-13)
  DVD: 01-Dec-2009

UK
  N/A

Australia
  21-May-2009
  DVD: 01-Dec-2009



[trailer] Trailer




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast