More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
1.78

Awesome: 0%
Worth A Look: 5%
Average: 27.5%
Pretty Bad: 7.5%
Total Crap60%

5 reviews, 10 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Shape of Water, The by Jay Seaver

I, Tonya by Rob Gonsalves

Wonder Wheel by Peter Sobczynski

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by Rob Gonsalves

Swindlers, The by Jay Seaver

Oro (Gold) by Jay Seaver

Disaster Artist, The by Peter Sobczynski

Explosion by Jay Seaver

Lucky (2017) by Rob Gonsalves

Breadwinner, The by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Taking of Pelham 1-2-3, The (2009)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Rob Gonsalves

"Stick with the original."
1 stars

To watch the original "The Taking of Pelham One Two Three" (1974) and then to watch the new remake is to witness, irrefutably, the decline of mainstream Hollywood filmmaking.

Now, the original’s director, Joseph Sargent, is no master — he also gave us Jaws: The Revenge and Goldengirl. But Sargent is a workaday director who can sometimes rise to a good script. On the other hand, Tony Scott, the director of the remake, shows here that he no longer knows what to do with a good script. The premise is pretty much the same, and screenwriter Brian Helgeland works up some sharp, pungent dialogue. Scott, however, stomps all over everything with his restless, headache-inducing Cuisinart style. This director is terrified to lose you for a split-second — either that or he gets bored very easily.

What’s funny is that the script introduces backstories for its two antagonists — New York subway dispatcher Walter Garber (Denzel Washington) and a jeering, tattooed hijacker calling himself Ryder (John Travolta) — where there were none in the 1974 film. Schlumpy Walter Matthau was on one side, ice-cold Robert Shaw was on the other, and we knew nothing about them other than what they did and said in the film. Here, we meet Garber’s wife and we hear about Ryder’s past life as a Wall Street inside trader, among other things; none of it is really necessary.

Washington has gone on this ride with Tony Scott once before, in 1995’s much superior Crimson Tide, wherein he did the same thing he does here — act as a soothing voice of reason in counterpoint to a loudly crazy white man. Where Robert Shaw was spare and stoic, John Travolta bounces off the walls, dropping F-bombs like pocket change, with a side order of bargain-basement Hannibal Lecter when Ryder pries the truth out of Garber about why he got busted down to dispatcher. Scott and Helgeland have reworked Pelham into a battle of wills between two temperamentally opposed men; at certain points Ryder starts to need to hear Garber’s voice, bleating for his return to the mic like a baby bawling for milk.

None of this especially matters, though, because the true star of the ‘74 Pelham was New York. And though the remake was likewise filmed on location, you wouldn’t know it from the way Scott fractures the footage into tatters. Ryder’s cohorts are interchangeable; the great Luis Guzman is one of them, but he never gets anything to play. John Turturro and James Gandolfini, as a hostage negotiator and the mayor respectively, aren’t allowed to show much personality; hell, Gandolfini did more with a few minutes of screen time as an affectionately sadistic hit man in Scott’s True Romance. Tony Scott has always been a hack, but in the past, like Joseph Sargent, he knew enough to chill out and let a good screenplay steer the ship. Not any more.

The original "Pelham" went like a shot without sacrificing the wonderfully irate character of the city or the thrills of the story. This one goes 100mph right out of the gate and loses — no, disregards — everything that made the old classic work. I knew it within thirty seconds: the original began with a confidently cool main theme by David Shire, this one kicks off with “99 Problems” by Jay-Z. There you go: the movie tries so hard to be hip it can't possibly be cool.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=18132&reviewer=416
originally posted: 06/15/09 08:39:36
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

9/13/17 morris campbell not bad the original is better 3 stars
2/26/11 brian Overactive camera movement and plot holes alternately cause nausea and snorts of derision. 2 stars
11/08/09 action movie fan decent remake, cast helps elevate hyper tony scott version of 1974 film 3 stars
11/06/09 Jeff Wilder Enjoyable while on. But fades once over. Inside Man and the original Pelham were better. 3 stars
8/11/09 damalc better than i expected but got silly late in the film 3 stars
6/26/09 mr.mike Clumsily handled ending mars an otherwise great movie. 4 stars
6/25/09 NatchuraLee This was a fun 90 min. of action. So what if it isn't the 1974 film? 4 stars
6/24/09 Kailee wasn't as good as i thought it would be. I wouldn't recommend it 3 stars
6/20/09 Ming This is a waste of time doing one that is differeint from the original, and not interestin 2 stars
6/15/09 Justin I hated it, amazingly everyone I was with liked it. No tension whatsoever. 2 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  12-Jun-2009 (R)
  DVD: 03-Nov-2009

UK
  N/A

Australia
  12-Jun-2009
  DVD: 03-Nov-2009




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast