More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 0%
Worth A Look: 0%
Average: 0%
Pretty Bad100%
Total Crap: 0%

1 review, 0 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Halloween (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

All About Nina by Jay Seaver

Lost, Found by Jay Seaver

Night of the Living Dead (1968) by Rob Gonsalves

Neomanila by Jay Seaver

First Man by Peter Sobczynski

Bad Times At The El Royale by Peter Sobczynski

Being Natural by Jay Seaver

Suspiria (1978) by Rob Gonsalves

Monsters and Men by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Man in the Attic
[] Buy posters from this movie
by Charles Tatum

"Look out, Aunt Bea! It's Jack the Ripper!"
2 stars

Marie Belloc Lowndes' novel "The Lodger" (previously filmed under that title three times) concerns a new tenant at a house in 1880's London who is suspected of being Jack the Ripper. The problem- if the cast of this version couldn't care less about the plot of their own film, then why should the audience?

Jack Palance, complete with sweat, tics, and an Elvis Presley hairdo, plays Slade, a mysterious pathologist who rents a room and an attic from down-on-their-luck couple William (Rhys Williams) and Aunt Bea...I mean, Helen (Frances Bavier) Harley. Slade keeps late hours, is a more than a little weird, and scares everyone around him. What's not to fall in love with? Lily (Constance Smith) is the Harleys' niece, and finds herself inexplicably attracted to the new lodger. Slade's competition for Lily's heart is convenient Scotland Yard inspector Warwick (Byron Palmer). You'll know Warwick because he looks just like Harvey Korman doing his Clark Gable impression on "The Carol Burnett Show." The cast suspect the odd Slade of the Jack the Ripper murders almost immediately, especially after his Freudian love/hate speech about his actress-mother, and his late night burning of contaminated clothing. You'll see the climax coming long before the cast does.

It's a straightforward story, yet the film wanders off the main plot so often, I needed GPS to get back on track. Warwick, who is supposed to be obsessed with the Jack the Ripper murders, spends more time pursuing Lily than studying that new fangled fingerprint technology or running down evidence. This leads to an odd scene where, as a date, Warwick takes Lily and third wheel Slade to a criminal museum at Scotland Yard! The only reason this scene exists is so Slade can make some more cryptic comments, and heap more suspicion upon himself. Lily is written as a strong independent woman who can juggle many an admirer; a rising star in the London theatre. Smith plays her as vacuous and shallow, a deluded Piccadilly cabaret dancer who lucked into her own dressing room. This is not a musical, but you may forget this as the viewer is treated to two long musical numbers, and one of the Ripper's victims sings an Irish tune before being hacked to death offscreen. Comically, two unnamed London policemen (out of the four thousand that are supposedly patrolling the streets) happen to walk home two of the victims, who are immediately killed while they are within earshot! Hauling them in for questioning might have been a good idea if you didn't know they weren't involved in the murders.

Half of the cast is not British, and make no effort to come up with an accent of any kind. The backlot where this was filmed looks more like eighteenth century Bavaria than late nineteenth century London. The American and British cast are marshalled by an Argentinian director with little vision. The shots are elementary and static, and no suspense is generated. It seems like the film makers wanted to take the edge off the subject matter, but to the point that the film is lifeless and top heavy with light touches that don't work (the jittery maid, the Harleys' suspicions, Slade's sweat, the musical numbers).

"The Lodger" was remade again a few years ago, and one of its early incarnations was directed by Alfred Hitchcock. I would hope either of those films was more suspenseful than this tedious exercise.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 05/31/09 07:12:21
[printer] printer-friendly format  

Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  23-Dec-1953 (NR)
  DVD: 11-Sep-2007



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast