More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 6.25%
Worth A Look: 8.33%
Average: 6.25%
Pretty Bad: 27.08%
Total Crap52.08%

4 reviews, 24 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Road Not Taken, The by Jay Seaver

Great Battle, The by Jay Seaver

True Fiction by Jay Seaver

Pick of the Litter by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Peter Sobczynski

House With A Clock In Its Walls, The by Peter Sobczynski

Life Itself (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

Unity of Heroes by Jay Seaver

Hanagatami by Jay Seaver

Predator, The by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Battle: Los Angeles
[] Buy posters from this movie
by Daniel Kelly

"Videogame: The Movie"
1 stars

There’s a special place in cinematic hell for “Battle: Los Angeles”, a despicably dumb and overbearing effort that deafens as regularly as it bores. Directed by Jonathan Liebesman, the film imagines itself as a blend of “Black Hawk Down” and “Independence Day”, putting a hefty military spin on the alien invasion subgenre. The movie does a decent job of capturing the frantic essence one imagines infantry divisions face in modern warfare, but fails in virtually every other department. The screenplay is appalling, whilst due to the relentless barrage of inert destruction we’re tasked with absorbing the actors simply become irrelevant. “Battle: Los Angeles” is essentially more akin to a videogame than a theatrically released motion picture.

Aliens have invaded Earth, rolling out a tirade of violence in most of the world’s major cities. In Los Angeles a group of military grunts led by young Lt. Martinez (Ramon Rodriguez) and Sgt. Michael Nantz (Aaron Eckhart) are tasked with rescuing a group of civilians before the cityscape is tactically obliterated. Nantz is a man recovering from the trauma of a troubled tour of duty in Afghanistan, this mission likely to be his last in the field. As the platoon maneuvers through the desecrated remnants of LA they are forced to do battle with the hostile extraterrestrials, finding the invaders both merciless and tricky to kill. After collecting the civilians (amongst them Michael Pena and a tired looking Bridget Moynahan), the squad is forced to try and escape Los Angeles before it’s burnt to the ground.

“Battle: Los Angeles” wastes no time in reaching top speed, quickly forgoing its formulaic and clichéd human components in favor of bland action. There’s no point in assessing the performances because nobody involved has any proper chance to register, Liebesman and writer Christopher Bertolini choking out the very concept of characterization through their wretched input. I’m happy enough for useless thespians like Ramon Rodriguez and Michelle Rodriguez to squander their nonexistent talents here, but Aaron Eckhart and Michael Pena really should know better. There’s no depth or humanity within the confines of “Battle: Los Angeles”, leaving me curious as to why the actors were drawn to the project in the first place.

Liebesman certainly manages to infuse a sense of scale into proceedings through his intense use of CGI, but fails to make his set-pieces exciting or stimulating. An early shootout between the marines and aliens occasionally musters some tension, but Liebesman feels the need to move away from this more intimate style of combat cinema, immediately pummeling viewers with sequences of bombastic carnage that would shame Roland Emmerich. There’s no soul or purpose evident during these moments of outright annihilation, Liebesman far more infatuated with big guns than his terrified protagonists. The characters are never engaging, meaning the action quickly becomes fully devoid of suspense or momentum. Visually it’s all top notch, but under the bonnet “Battle: Los Angeles” is a consistently cold and corny blockbuster.

The villains haunt the outskirts of the movie, often just off frame or marginally out of focus. I can’t imagine this was a budgetary concern, instead it must be a further tool deployed to try and concoct an organically distorted aura of chaos. “Battle: Los Angeles” certainly has no trouble constructing a crazed and dizzyingly kinetic atmosphere, Liebesman throwing the camera around like a javelin. Of course this also means large chunks of the movie are completely incomprehensible, it becomes wearisome trying to keep track of all the cardboard characters and unimaginative narrative objectives. Bertolini’s first draft probably did have some sort of structure, but it’s not evident in the disorganized and messy final product presented here.

Composer Brian Tyler adds another subpar score to his CV with “Battle: Los Angeles”, his intrusive musical input adding to the headache inducing noisiness that ultimately consumes this awful picture. The project doesn’t even provide an enjoyable finale, instead opting for an obvious climactic skirmish coupled with the sort of mawkish military heroics one expects from a lesser Michael Bay production. “Battle: Los Angeles” is a frighteningly inept endeavor, an unintelligible and shallow example of what can occur when a bunch of hacks get their hands on $70 million. It’s a cultural warning not to be ignored.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 05/10/11 19:31:07
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

9/16/17 morris campbell better than independance day 3 stars
1/06/14 reptilesni Made Independence Day look like it was written by Stephen Hawking. At least ID4 was fun. 1 stars
3/01/13 KingNeutron Disappointing - could have used a better director 2 stars
8/27/12 David Pollastrini The most boring alien invasion film I've ever seen. 1 stars
3/11/12 Silkworm Film so bad I can't even end this sente..... 1 stars
9/11/11 Captain00Kirk The camerawork is great! (Sarcasm) 1 stars
8/19/11 Meep waste of time and money 1 stars
7/17/11 Rich The military are the good guys, what will Hollywood think of next? It was great! 5 stars
7/07/11 mr.mike I know I'm in the minority here , but I thought it was damn good 4 stars
6/18/11 Jennifer Barr very disapointed 2 stars
6/13/11 Shaun A Unbelievable but enjoyable, a bit like Independence Day 4 stars
5/15/11 stephen nettles Fun trash. 4 stars
3/28/11 gc Blackhawk Down with aliens, and not nearly as good of a movie 2 stars
3/27/11 joshmage Directors and Producers who support this constant camera shaking should be shot in the head 1 stars
3/26/11 M. Rogers Not great, but better on big screen that it will be on T.V. sets. 3 stars
3/21/11 holly sines did not live up to what i had expected...and the ending? 3 stars
3/20/11 M Disappointed. The only highlight was Michelle Rodriguez 2 stars
3/16/11 Bigdipperstar I liked the action and the special effects. Finally the men and women in uniform treated > 5 stars
3/16/11 nancyn yeesh. can't they put that much action around a decent script? 2 stars
3/16/11 John clark Pure escapism, I loved every explosive part of it. 4 stars
3/14/11 james Lots of action. Overall bad film :/ 2 stars
3/14/11 Jack Just awful. I want my money (and time) back! 1 stars
3/12/11 Dan Mostly Cliched, but holy fux, aliens were bad ass, action is dix in face, and LA is fucked. 5 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  11-Mar-2011 (PG-13)
  DVD: 14-Jun-2011

  11-Mar-2011 (12A)

  24-Mar-2011 (M)
  DVD: 14-Jun-2011

Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast