More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.9

Awesome: 26.83%
Worth A Look41.46%
Average: 26.83%
Pretty Bad: 4.88%
Total Crap: 0%

2 reviews, 29 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Hal by Jay Seaver

I, Origins by Greg Ursic

Boyhood by Daniel Kelly

Uzumasa Limelight by Jay Seaver

Goal of the Dead by Jay Seaver

Yasmine by Jay Seaver

Mr. Go by Jay Seaver

Hercules (2014) by Brett Gallman

Wish I Was Here by Jaycie

Predestination by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Death Wish
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Slyder

"A Minor Classic That Surpasses All Expectations"
4 stars

Back in 1972, Brian Garfield released Death Wish, a novel which was a clear example of liberalism and its effects on society in both Good and Evil. Then a film version starring Charles Bronson, was released in 1974 and went way beyond what the book intended, establishing an interesting, original, yet much more controversial statement in dealing with crime and punishment, and is sure to blow away anyone that sees it, and make that someone put his money where his mouth is and try and defend his own views on the subject.

Paul Kersey is a bleeding-heart liberal architect who’s enjoyed life to the fullest. He has a beautiful wife, Joanna (Hope Lange), and a daughter Carol (Kathleen Tolan) married to a high society guy. But soon things would go horribly wrong one day, since a gang of punks, disguised as shopping market delivery boys, manage to break into the house and kill Joanna and rape Carol. All in one day, Paul’s life is torn apart. Seeking desperately for peace of mind, Paul travels for a company landscape survey in Arizona, where a friend of his introduces him to guns (or reintroduces him), and as soon as he returns in New York, little by little, his inner fury is suddenly blown into vengeance against crime in general and turns into a Vigilante, which causes a huge stir in the streets, amongst the police, the criminals, and people in general.

The film’s portrayal of vigilantism is as right as it is wrong. Crime has always been present in our society, and in a liberalist point of view, if you rob someone, you or the person that witnesses this have a right to punish the robber. Unfortunately, people at times take it into extreme by taking the law into their own hands and end up with a “Law of The Jungle” situation, hence the problem with this movie. The police force is there to protect our rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, but there will always be people that will always violate our rights, and the Police is not always there when we need it, hence the vigilantism, an issue which will forever be debated by both Liberal and Conservatist sides. Many will tend to agree with Paul’s idea of justice, especially in places where crime is overwhelming, and its better for someone to just grab all that scum and flush it in the toilet, hence justice is done. But it’s also wrong since were violating people’s rights (oh yes, as shocking as it is) to life, so hence the argument of about when “punishment can fit the crime.” In the novel, Garfield made this point clear and the message was that crime is wrong, but taking the law by your own hands CAN be as bad; in other words, he’s slamming the criminals and the vigilante. But what’s original about this movie is that is manipulative about the subject, instead of making a general point, it makes you think what is right? Is the vigilante solution a good one? Sure it can be, but are you willing to pay the price? But the counter issue arrives: Are you willing to accept crime as part of YOUR view of society? And of course, ridiculous, yet true statements will appear that if this happened, the police and the justice department would be out of the job. In any case, you’ll find yourself cheering for Paul (hell, I was), and why not? He’s doing society a favor, but if you analyze well, you might find a disturbing thought. Is he doing it rightfully? And that’s what’s great about the movie. Another great part that struck me was Paul’s transformation from bleeding-heart liberal to fascist vigilante, how he slowly transforms, from the first moment he hits a mugger with a sock full of quarters, to the moment he pulls his gun and shoots another mugger, with the climax being when he goes to his apartment and pukes his guts out. The screenplay also avoids formula, since Kersey doesn’t SPECIFICALLY go and try to find those muggers that destroyed his family, and kill them all, which would’ve made it a formulaic predictable suspense flick. Instead the fury is taken to the criminals in general in the streets, and that helps it a lot. Praise to the screenwriter Wendell Mayes for his work.

The technical aspects of it are also a few pluses in the film. The cinematography is great, but what’s best is the music score by Jazz legend Herbie Hancock, since it helps in most times establish the moods of most scenes, and is also as weird yet cool to listen (If you’ve heard Thomas Newman’s score in American Beauty, you’ll know what I’m talking about). Michael Winner’s direction is also on the spot, since it never overreaches, and lets the action happen like it’s supposed to happen, while never oveblowing the simplicity of the scene and the story itself. The performances were quite a surprise. Usually never has been a time to see Bronson take a role with this diversity, since the public is accustomed to the other Charles Bronson, the tough guy who doesn’t take any shit from anybody. But this role is surprising, and more surprising that Bronson pulls it off. He has a wooden face, but yet he still manages to deliver a likeable performance. The rest of the supporting cast is also great, especially Vincent Gardenia as Frank Ochoa, the detective who is trying to find who the vigilante is.

In the end, this film has already been imitated over and over, and it’s considered a minor classic, yet it’s still as fresh and original as it was when it was originally released. Arguably, one of Bronson’s best films, this film is a must for any fan of film or fan of films like Dirty Harry (Just for the love of god, don’t watch the awful sequels). Besides, you get to see Jeff Goldblum in a bizarre cameo as one of the punks that get to “spray-paint” Kersey’s daughter. Who would’ve thought that possible?

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=2100&reviewer=235
originally posted: 09/20/02 04:41:58
[printer] printer-friendly format  
Trilogy Starters: For more in the Trilogy Starters series, click here.

User Comments

4/10/11 The Big D It's like 80s-style pro wrestling--cheer for the "good guy!" 4 stars
1/21/10 PAUL SHORTT CHILLING AND UNPLEASANT BUT EFFECTIVELY CAPTIVATING 3 stars
1/10/10 art AN EXCELLENT FILM,BRONSON is a mugger-hitman! 4 stars
3/18/09 Josie Cotton is a goddess Gripping! 5 stars
3/27/08 Tim While not as exploitative as the others, it manages to be both shallow and comptemplative. 3 stars
3/08/08 Pamela White Bronson at his best could have left out the first 20 min. 5 stars
3/05/08 art this movie is CHARLES BRONSONS BEST 4 stars
9/27/07 Paul Kersey Watch out punks 5 stars
8/01/07 mr.mike bronson convincing as NY liberal turned vigilante 4 stars
6/20/07 George Chabot Highly satisfying smackdown of leftist coddling of poor misunderstood criminals. 5 stars
1/27/07 action movie fan classic bronson vigilate film--not disappointing, taut classic thriller 5 stars
1/17/07 David Pollastrini One of Bronson's best 5 stars
6/18/06 Indrid Cold Quite disappointing given its reputation. The horrible 70s style is quite distracting. 3 stars
10/30/05 bill dominica i spray paint ass for living and get paid! 5 stars
10/29/05 freddie king Really great ass spray painting action. 5 stars
5/26/04 Lance Simply the greatest movie about a vigilante... 5 stars
12/06/03 john solid urban thriller 4 stars
11/25/03 Dick Fitswell alright 4 stars
11/14/03 Douglas lacayo This film is a classic 4 stars
9/17/03 Misterkraig A great film, Bronson's best!! 5 stars
9/08/03 Sugarfoot Powerful film, undermined by 4 lame sequels. 4 stars
1/21/03 Andy Bronson good film that has been tainted by the number of bad sequels just like highlander in that w 3 stars
1/04/03 Jack Sommersby Manipulative but irresistable stuff. 4 stars
9/20/02 Charles Tatum Nihilistic and sleazy 2 stars
4/22/02 po ngu exellent film 5 stars
1/31/01 R.W. Welch Bronson was born for this part and does it exactly right. 4 stars
12/07/00 Cristopher Revilla good depiction, one that makes you think about today's law enforcement 4 stars
7/04/99 J-Dogg What's the big deal? This film didn't grab me at all. 2 stars
6/03/99 Filmink Magazine Like all 70's action flicks, a very ordinary finish and weird direction, but not the worst. 3 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  02-Jul-1974 (R)

UK
  02-Feb-1975 (15)

Australia
  02-Feb-1975 (R)




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2014, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast