More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.77

Awesome35.56%
Worth A Look: 26.67%
Average: 23.33%
Pretty Bad: 7.78%
Total Crap: 6.67%

3 reviews, 72 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Hobbit, The: The Battle of the Five Armies by Peter Sobczynski

Strong Man, The by Jay Seaver

Top Five by Jay Seaver

Zero Motivation by Jay Seaver

Exodus: Gods and Kings by Peter Sobczynski

Imitation Game, The by Peter Sobczynski

It Follows by Jay Seaver

Sea Fog (Haemoo) by Jay Seaver

Men, Women & Children by Daniel Kelly

Best of Me, The by Jaycie

subscribe to this feed


Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Rob Gonsalves

"Anything goes."
5 stars

Steven Spielberg can make all the tributes to the nobility of man he wants; underneath that, the man's a closet sadist. Exhibit A: 'Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.'

Not that sadism in the service of cinematic thrills is a bad thing. Some part of an entertainer has to enjoy putting his/her characters, and audience, through the wringer. In Temple of Doom, easily the disreputable skunk of the Indiana Jones series, Spielberg runs his heroes ragged and beats up the audience while screaming in our faces (in the voice of John Williams' bombastic score) for close to two hours. A lot of people loathe it, and not just because it feels at times as if Mola Ram had directed it; there are stereotypes racist and sexist, the hero (Harrison Ford) is sort of a prick here, and the adventure is marred for many by two Jar Jar Binkses the spunky child sidekick Short Round ("Hold onto your potatoes!") and the shrieking, gold-digging Willie Scott ("Ohhh, I broke a naiiiil").

Despite all this, and perhaps because of it, I love the movie dearly. Raiders of the Lost Ark is still and ever shall remain my all-time sentimental favorite film, but when I want Spielberg in his manic I'll-entertain-you-to-death mode, I pop in Temple of Doom. That so many people despise it only endears it to me all the more. As pure adrenaline cinema, it's just about unimpeachable.

Even the film's detractors have to give it up for the opening sequence, which sets the tone for this outing: Willie (Kate Capshaw, the future Mrs. Spielberg) singing "Anything Goes" in Club Obi-Wan while the dancers do things dancers can't do. Woe to anyone who expects Temple of Doom to have, as Harlan Ellison put it in his review, anything more than an elephant's fart to do with reality. Raiders pushed physical plausibility, but only a little; Temple of Doom muscles rudely past plausibility within minutes and keeps going.

The movie is technically a "prequel" to Raiders, set the year before, so Indy is still after "fortune and glory, kid." In that respect he's little better than Willie, who loves shiny things. By the time Raiders starts, Indy has been literally beaten out of his mercenary stance in Temple of Doom and seen true human suffering, perhaps for the first time. The quest for the Sankara Stones, whose disappearance has doomed an entire village, leads Indy and company to a vast cavern of horrors underneath an Indian palace. A boy runs the place upstairs, while downstairs poor boys anguish in the rubble. Indy is about to abscond smugly with the Stones when he notices the underage slave labor and decides to get involved. And this is after the infamous Temple of Doom sequence, in which a man has his heart ripped out by Thuggee leader Mola Ram and, still alive, is lowered into a pit of lava.

Reportedly George Lucas, going through a divorce, and Spielberg were not in the best of moods when making Temple of Doom. It shows. The movie is easily the darkest, dingiest, and murkiest of what I'll now call the Original Trilogy. Its reception by legions of appalled parents (despite the ads' disclaimer, reminiscent of Jaws, "Some material may be too intense for younger viewers") almost single-handedly ushered in the PG-13 rating (that and Gremlins, another Spielberg production in the summer of '84). Yet there's joy in the movie, albeit dark joy. Temple of Doom stands nearly alone as a multimillion-dollar mainstream Hollywood experimental film: There's very little plot, just one apocalyptic set piece after another. The movie was also a dumping ground for all the stuff Lucas and Spielberg wanted to put in Raiders but couldn't, and so it's a towering case of self-indulgence. Spielberg reigns here with a very heavy hand, lightened somewhat by Michael Kahn's usual so-sharp-it-draws-blood editing.

Other movies, including Raiders and the 007 series, had used a story as a clothesline for thrills. But Temple of Doom, especially once it hits Sri Lanka, is close to a porn movie in structure and emphasis: build, climax, satiation; build, climax, satiation; over and over again. Spielberg's specialty here is the danger averted, only to encounter a greater or equal danger. I can sympathize with those who find the movie exhausting. Its very hammering relentlessness singles it out as the most personal of the Indy films. Now garlanded with Oscars and credibility, Spielberg prefers to dismiss Temple of Doom as unpleasant juvenalia. The next Indy film was considerably softer, with added father-son sentimentality, but Temple was actually the closest to the remorseless, politically incorrect adventure serials that sparked this series in the first place.

It's also the closest Harrison Ford has come to playing a bona fide villain (if you don't count the rigid asshole he played in The Mosquito Coast and the husband in What Lies Beneath). When Indy is forced to drink the black blood of Kali, he's deformed into a grinning, simian brute who seems to take psychotic amusement in pain. Ford doesn't just play it as zombie-like subservience; as Alexandra Dupont pointed out, he "looks like he's really into all the sadism and blood, like he's actually tapped into some dark part of his personality that was there all along." Indy becomes Mola Ram's apt pupil for a while, and Spielberg goes right along with him. The editing, the score ("Gho-ram, gho-ram, gho-ram sundaram"), the dried-blood photography Spielberg is playing for keeps here; he wants the movie to hurt. That first sacrifice sequence is top-notch horror directing; I still get chills when Mola Ram moves slowly into frame to face his human sacrifice. I'm sorry to say I'm unfamiliar with Amrish Puri's many other performances, but this one is a definitive portrait of the higher evil.

The whippings are near-constant even Short Round is whipped as if Spielberg wanted us to feel what Indy's weapon of choice really does to people. At one point, while up against a big bruiser, Indy gets punched in the nipple and gasps; I'd love to know who thought of that painful little detail. So, with all this darkness and blood and agony, why do I have so much fun with Temple of Doom? Because it's cathartic as hell, for Spielberg and for those of us who go for the ride. The mayhem is transporting, inspired, exultant. Spielberg has nothing to apologize for, and I wish he wouldn't. The script by Willard Huyck and Gloria Katz does get a bit cheesy okay, a lot cheesy ("Your friend has seen. And she has heard. Now she will not talk") but Spielberg uses it as an excuse for gags. That whole sequence in the bug tomb with the spiked floor and ceiling has a magical virtuosity that can't be scripted. Storyboarded, yes. Temple of Doom, like Sam Raimi's Army of Darkness, is like a comic book drawn by a little boy with a bottomless bucket of Magic Markers.

That so many geeks and fanboys bring such hate for the movie only recommends it more highly. The racism, the sexism, the fear of sex inherent in these boy's-book adventures are amplified to a near-hysterical pitch here, turning a black mirror on the desires stoked and satisfied by summer entertainment. If what you want is bad-ass action, 'Temple of Doom' gives you that plus a hard punch in the nipple.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=2295&reviewer=416
originally posted: 11/08/07 14:46:04
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

12/14/12 roscoe my favorite in the series. 5 stars
12/11/12 Jem Not as good as Raiders of the lost ark. Nowhere near. 1 stars
3/01/12 jcar a good sequel with lot of greats stunts and effects, ford is awesome , the heroine stinks. 4 stars
1/04/12 Flipsider HORRIBLE screenplay drags this movie down. Capshaw SUCKS. 2 stars
2/25/11 Jean One helluva Rollercosterride. Dark, funny and fast. Best of the Quadrilogy. 5 stars
6/11/10 Flathead King This is one disgusting and sick movie. 1 stars
1/30/09 PAUL SHORTT AN OBVIOUS STEP DOWN FROM ITS PREDECESSOR, TOO MUCH BRUTALITY AND HORROR 3 stars
1/13/09 Anonymous. good and enjoyable. 4 stars
6/10/08 Johnnyfaye An okay movie saved by an amazing puls pounding ending 3 stars
4/30/08 David Cohen Indiana Jones and the annoying, worthless co-stars 2 stars
3/30/08 Pamela White Harrison at his best 5 stars
1/18/08 Dannyboy Classic adventure, but inconsistent story makes it the weakest of the 3.. gotta love shorty 4 stars
1/07/08 Aaron Commareri Not as great as the first one, but still worth a look. 4 stars
11/12/07 mark madsen I love Indiana Jones movies 5 stars
11/11/07 reddye5 The darkest one. Very different from the first. It moves quickly. I liked it a lot. 4 stars
6/15/07 Vincent Ebriega Underappreciated as a sequel. This is definitely as good as its predecessor. 5/5. 5 stars
6/01/07 R.W. Welch Has almost none of the pizzaz of episode one. 3 stars
12/29/06 David Pollastrini not as good as the first 3 stars
2/11/06 Anthony Indiana Jones Almost in hell ?????? 3 stars
8/28/05 Quigley the awesome mine cart chase can't redeem this one. it's too dark and sometimes disturbing. 3 stars
8/26/05 EZ Letdown, gross, and Capshaw sucked 2 stars
5/27/05 tony alright film. sometimes scary and horrific scenes. 3 stars
3/31/05 Katherine Frazier great movie 5 stars
3/25/05 indrid cold Great action/adventure. It only looks bad in comparison to Raiders. 5 stars
1/19/05 Aaron Smith I loved Kate Capshaw, but Short Round annoying. 4 stars
1/04/05 t-1000 the mine cart chase is cheesy! the bridge scene saves this film, though 3 stars
12/27/04 mjoc Huge disapointment. Kate Capshaw is awful! 2 stars
10/16/04 Denise I love indy 5 stars
9/10/04 keithers.. watching the making of...steven let lucas...do what he wanted with this one..and it shows 3 stars
8/19/04 courtney love the rail cart scene have to see movie 5 stars
6/11/04 Maribel More like comedy kinda scary than action-adventure. Watch the other two instead. 3 stars
5/05/04 dead next door better than crucade,but that aint saying much cos it was totally crap. 3 stars
3/27/04 Littlepurch. Worst of the 3 but the rail cart scene MUST become a classic! 4 stars
1/18/04 Eric Awesome and thrilling action make this a great thrill ride. 5 stars
1/15/04 Samuel the best of the series. 4 stars
12/14/03 Joe Weakest story of the series, but also has the best and most thrilling action. Ford rocks. 5 stars
12/07/03 john my favorite in this wonderful series - the action is sensational 5 stars
11/09/03 Eddie Fan This was better then the first and third movie! Excellent movie! The best. 5 stars
11/02/03 John Bale Lacking pace of the first Indiana flick and a heavy dose of horror, but still remarkable 4 stars
11/02/03 Skilly Skally yeah, cool because of HF and SS but otherwise inferior to Raiders and Crusade 4 stars
10/26/03 Erik Van Sant Yeah...Parts of this really stink. But I loved it when I was a kid. George Lucas blows ass. 4 stars
9/06/03 Dimitri Aubert Good start, but overall disapointing movie. 3 stars
8/09/03 Will Green Yeah, it's the best of the trilogy. IT'S ALSO MY CHILDHOOD, FUCKERS 5 stars
3/21/03 defranco73 The third best of the trilogy, behind Raiders and Last Crusade. 5 stars
3/04/03 Jack Sommersby The best of the series. 4 stars
2/07/03 Eric 3rd best adventure film ever, behind only Last Crusade and Raiders. 5 stars
1/29/03 T-man The mine cart chase was fucking retarded 2 stars
7/12/02 KMG Boring 3 stars
7/04/02 gary vidmar I really enjoyed this film, despite you critics. 5 stars
6/25/02 Charles Tatum Kate Capshaw- The Most Annoying Character Ever 2 stars
5/13/02 Dark Baron Entertainment at its best. Can't wait for the DVD. 5 stars
4/03/02 Stephanie Throckmorton Almost infinite improvement over predecessor; action and romantic setting exquisite! 5 stars
3/17/02 Zargo entertaining 4 stars
1/18/02 David A. Tried to outdo "Raiders" with more gore and special effects but forgot the story. 1 stars
9/29/01 Phoenix Awsome. Never lets us breath for a second. 5 stars
8/21/01 Monster W. Kung A very worthy sequel, although different from the first. 4 stars
8/07/01 Mr. Hat (formerly Joe Zappa) George Lucas & Steven Spielberg make a great team for such a greatgory family action flick. 5 stars
8/06/01 E-Funk Ugh...um, I have to like it because of Indy, but not the best of the three. 4 stars
5/02/01 sharkey Good, but not great. Too slow for an Indy film. 4 stars
4/02/01 Jesse L Suffers by comparison with the other two 3 stars
2/16/01 lisa i never walk out of a movie but........ 1 stars
2/11/01 KyLe*BrOfLoVsKi It kicks enough ass on its own, but compared to the other two it's no great shakes. 4 stars
12/09/00 fifu it is entertain for action but nothing else 3 stars
11/28/00 Cristopher Revilla this movie wasn't that great, and those gory scenes should've made it R-rated, not PG. 4 stars
11/24/00 The Evil Penguin Although this is one of my favorite films, I think this is the worst of the Series 5 stars
9/07/00 movie knower this movie is like the old stupid adventure movies from the 50's.total crap. 1 stars
5/31/00 danilo A BREATH OF FRESH AIR - MUCH BETTER THAN CRUSADE 5 stars
5/05/00 matt Not as good as the other 2 but stil a great movie 5 stars
2/27/00 Jana This one is second only to Raiders. 5 stars
1/24/00 Casey Jarzabek OVERRATED 1 stars
1/20/00 Jedi15 Don't listen to that idiot Mic. This movie is great! Better than the third! 5 stars
11/29/99 Mic I didn't like Raiders as much as most but this has to be the worst in the series. 2 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  02-Jul-1984 (PG)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2014, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast