More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.67

Awesome: 10.87%
Worth A Look65.22%
Average: 13.04%
Pretty Bad: 2.17%
Total Crap: 8.7%

1 review, 40 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Revenge of the Green Dragons by Jay Seaver

Birdman by Peter Sobczynski

John Wick by Peter Sobczynski

Blue Room, The by Jay Seaver

Cat and the Canary, The (1927) by Jay Seaver

#Stuck by Jay Seaver

Fury (2014) by Jay Seaver

Book of Life, The (2014) by Jay Seaver

Golden Era, The by Jay Seaver

Maze Runner, The by Daniel Kelly

subscribe to this feed


Psycho 2
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by David Cornelius

"Believe it or not, it's actually a great flick."
4 stars

It’s easy to understand why a sequel to Alfred Hitchcock’s “Psycho” would be looked upon as a bad idea on par with such modern questionables as a remake of “Mr. Deeds Goes To Town” starring Adam Sandler, an update of “Rollerball” with Chris Klein, or a new “House of Wax” with (ugh) Paris Hilton.

But before you go yelling that “Psycho II” was just some lame excuse to ride the slasher movie trend of the 1980s, just watch the movie. True, the violence has been upgraded to appease then-modern horror movie buffs, but for the most part, it’s a terrific mystery that pays tribute to the original classic without cheapening it.

The film picks up 22 years after the events in the first movie. Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins, but you knew that) has been declared fit to return to society, cured of mental illness and homicidal tendencies. He returns to his home above the Bates Motel, gets a job at the local diner, and even meets a nice young lady, Mary (Meg Tilly), who accepts Norman’s invite to move in.

Of course, not everybody’s happy to see Norman out and about. Lila Crane-Loomis (Vera Miles) is still plenty pissed, for good reason. Warren Toomey (Dennis Franz) is also plenty pissed, since he was running the motel until Bates came home and fired him. And then there’s Norman’s mother, who may or may not still be alive.

That last one’s a doozy, as it lays the groundwork for some wicked twists that remind the viewer that above all else, the original “Psycho” was a great mind game. The sequel, written by Tom Holland and directed by Richard Franklin (who later teamed up on the underrated 80s kid thriller “Cloak & Dagger”), plays a clever game with the audience, making sure we’re always guessing. Is someone else in the house? Is it mother? Is Norman crazy? Is someone just trying to drive him mad?

I’m not telling, although I will say the surprises still feel sharp after multiple viewings. The final scene is a real kicker, as it gives us one beauty of a plot twist, then a relatively unexpected action... then a few creepy final visuals. The last few minutes alone are worth the rental cost.

While the script plays as a treat for any fan of twist-laden movies, the real treats go to the hardcore “Psycho” fan. This is a film that doesn’t merely understand its roots; it respects them to no end. Franklin and Holland know their Hitch, and they delight in teasing the audience with familiar shots and situations. When Mary stops to take a shower, when we see holes in walls, when we see characters head on down to the fruit cellar, we wait, wondering if we’ll see what we think we’ll see.

And yet, Franklin isn’t merely ripping off Hitchcock’s famed visuals. He provides visual tricks all his own, allowing cameras to glide and wander as gracefully they did in the original, but with different results. He may be working in the style of Hitchcock, but the results are far from carbon copies.

This helps make “Psycho II” its own work, related to “Psycho” but not bound to it. The film has a rhythm all its own, as evident by Jerry Goldsmith’s hauntingly quiet piano theme - a complete opposite from Bernard Hermann’s famous music for strings. Even Perkins refuses to repeat himself; whereas his younger Norman was fidgety and tightly wound, the older Perkins is a little looser, a little more mellow (until things start to get bad, and we get the Norman we remember).

So no, “Psycho II” is not a bad idea at all. It’s a great mystery and a gripping thriller, a sequel that supports its predecessor instead of diminishes. Franklin and Holland manage to turn one of the most influential films of the last century into the beginning of a franchise - a risky project, but one that comes off effortlessly.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=2381&reviewer=392
originally posted: 12/05/04 07:14:44
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

7/13/12 keith miron Better than part 3 4 stars
9/25/11 The Big D Toomey had it coming! 4 stars
10/09/10 art A FINE SEQUAL!,but it pales in comparsion to the original PSYCHO! 3 stars
9/07/10 warren sawkins psycho 3. Interesting well written story. The sex scenes spoil it. 4 stars
7/20/10 LON Dull 1 stars
12/29/09 WARREN SAWKINS. HAVE ALL PSYCHO MOVIES EVER MADE, NO: 2. IS THE BEST OF ALL, SEEN IT OVER 100 TIMES. 5 stars
10/11/09 PAUL SHORTT A SMART, DARKLY-COMIC SEQUEL, IF ON THE GORY SIDE WITH SOME IMAGINATIVE TWISTS 3 stars
12/30/07 Sugarfoot Unnecessary sequel is decent but not a patch on the original. 3 stars
4/28/07 David Pollastrini a pretty good sequel 4 stars
7/19/06 William Goss Like the sheriff says, a tad slow, but not incompetent. 3 stars
1/02/06 cody a creepy sequel were norman bates gets out for more blood and carnage! suspenseful flick 3 stars
11/08/05 Joe Clark Awesome performance by Perkins 5 stars
11/07/05 ^podo great movie, a lotter better and scarier than i thought it would be 4 stars
9/22/05 ShadowFace5 A bit contrived. 4 stars
11/19/04 screb better than i thought it could be 4 stars
7/31/04 jmsynth Leave thoughts of original behind, of of the most effective Horrors of the last 30 years 4 stars
6/07/04 Ryan Clark Superior in many ways to the original, this sequel is suspenseful and blackly comic. 5 stars
4/24/04 J A spine-chilling tale! It could of been even more SCARY!!! But it wasn't *** 1/2 4 stars
3/23/04 Trannon Goble Good sequel 4 stars
2/23/04 john it works - it's not the original but the story is good and believable- scary too! 4 stars
8/12/03 Double G NO MORE!!! 1 stars
4/05/03 Jack Sommersby Until it self-destructs in the final-third, this is first-rate, suspenseful entertainment. 4 stars
4/03/03 Zach This was pretty good! 4 stars
3/31/03 Mark Davidson. 23 Seen it first in 86 and was really to young to understand it's complex nature.Now, brill. 5 stars
2/05/03 Charles Tatum They should have stopped here 4 stars
11/06/02 E. Clifton Daniel Confused flick with some vulgar violence. Acting proves hammy or worse. 2 stars
8/16/02 Shaun pretty good, at least better than most sequels 4 stars
4/22/02 Jolohoho I liked it. Norman Bates is my favorite movie carachter. 4 stars
1/17/02 David A. Not as good as the original or Psycho 3. Still, you see the whole set. 4 stars
11/05/01 Matthew Hall Not Bad 4 stars
8/07/01 Mr. Hat Freaky! 4 stars
8/06/01 E-Funk Interesting...one genuine moment of terror, but that's about it. 3 stars
7/28/01 Henry Ginsberg Almost as good as the original . 4 stars
7/12/01 Donald Cockram Your reviewer proves totally wrong about this film. 4 stars
3/29/01 Andrew Carden You might really enjoy this one better, I sure did. 4 stars
3/25/01 Monster W. Kung Not as bad as Highlander II, but still a very lame sequel. Leave the first alone. 1 stars
1/26/01 Diego Romero What´cha talking about,this movie is great! 4 stars
9/08/00 Gray Vera Miles was great but so underused. Halfway thru you don't care who lives, dies or kills 1 stars
5/29/00 todd good but not great 4 stars
5/01/00 Gus Van Sant I 've shited movies that were just as good.Ahhh... 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  02-Jun-1983 (R)
  DVD: 13-Sep-2005

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A


Directed by
  Richard Franklin

Written by
  Tom Holland

Cast
  Anthony Perkins
  Vera Miles
  Meg Tilly
  Robert Loggia
  Dennis Franz
  Hugh Gillin



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2014, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast