More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.14

Awesome: 14.29%
Worth A Look: 25.71%
Average37.14%
Pretty Bad: 5.71%
Total Crap: 17.14%

1 review, 29 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Magic in the Moonlight by Daniel Kelly

But Always by Jay Seaver

Finding Fanny by Jay Seaver

Real by Jay Seaver

Hunter X Hunter: The Last Mission by Jay Seaver

Pirates, The (2014) by Jay Seaver

Naked Ambition 3D by Jay Seaver

Time Lapse by Jay Seaver

Black Butler by Jay Seaver

Drop, The by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed


Psycho 3
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by David Cornelius

"The worst of the series so far, but still well worth a look."
3 stars

If “Psycho II” turned out to be far better than anyone expected, how about “Psycho III?” Well, it’s a lesser film, to be sure, but I still like it. Granted, its writing is sloppy and its acting is shaky, but it has three key scenes that are so inventive, so intelligent, so flat-out interesting, that they make the rest of the movie worth the time.

We open with a strange prologue in which nun-to-be Maureen (Diana Scarwid) denounces God, inadvertently causes the death of another nun, and runs away. Wandering through the desert, she’s picked up by greasy drifter Duane Duke (Jeff Fahey), who doesn’t seem to get that she’s not picking up on his advances because a) she used to live in a convent, and b) he’s a greasy drifter.

Anyway, the two split ways, and we move on to the Bates Motel, where things have picked up right where the finale of “Psycho II” left off. (There’s even a flashback in case you’ve forgotten how that one ended.) Our old pal Norman (Anthony Perkins - who else?) has posted a “help wanted” sign, and it’s Duane who gets the job. Maureen shows up later, and Duane gives her the infamous cabin no. 1. But Norman can’t shake the feeling she’s not Maureen, but Marion Crane.

As a movie, it’s so-so. The film plays like a smart mystery poorly mixed with a dumb 80s slasher flick; there’s one rather graphic murder scene that feels added in just to cash in on the horror trend of the time. It doesn’t seem a part of the “Psycho” series. The other deaths, however, are right in line with the minimum-blood, suspense-over-gore technique. (I don’t consider these movies horror as much as thriller.)

The plot’s a little nonexistent this time around. Norman seems to be falling for Maureen, and vice versa. Duane is a creep. A nosy reporter (Roberta Maxwell) has come to town to check up on Norman’s rehabilitation. And mother’s been talking again.

That’s all there is, really. Gone is the intricate mystery of “Psycho II” (I won’t bother to compare this to the original “Psycho;” it wouldn’t be fair). In its place is a rather interesting, softer character study - can a mass murderer and a mentally unbalanced former religious type find love? - blended with a less engaging chain of killings. The screenplay, by Charles Edward Pogue, lacks the kick of the previous entries, as it doesn’t contain the glorious surprises of those films.

Which brings me to those three key scenes. Two are just nifty bits that always catch my eye. In one, the famous “shower scene” is recreated nearly shot-for-shot... in a telephone booth. In the other, a body is hidden in the motel’s ice machine; will the sheriff notice the ice he’s sucking on has some blood on it?

It’s the third key scene that really gets to me. It’s yet another take on the shower scene, this time with Mother entering Maureen’s room just as she did those many years ago. But the script throws us a curve, resulting in a move that’s smarter than anything else in the movie. I won’t tell you what it is (you’ll have to see for yourself), but it’s a scene that gets me every time.

Behind all this is Perkins, who, in addition to his reprisal of his most famous role, also marks his directorial debut. Perkins knows the material and seems to enjoy tinkering with the characters. His decision to have everyone play a little too over-the-top doesn’t quite work, as what is meant to come off as black humor often times comes off as merely Jeff Fahey not acting well. Still, Perkins’ playful mood keeps the movie from sinking into an overly-serious zone, and some of the plot’s dumber moments are allowed to be tossed aside with tongue in cheek.

So just as “Psycho II” was a great movie on its own and a fair successor to “Psycho,” “Psycho III” is a decent movie on its own and a fair successor to “Psycho II.” It’s not a great movie by any means, but any fan of the Hitchcock classic whose curiosity was snagged by “Psycho II” should find something of interest to see here. It’s not, as its ads once claimed, “the most shocking of them all,” but it does have enough clever bits to earn a recommendation.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=2382&reviewer=392
originally posted: 12/05/04 07:46:42
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

4/10/13 Durwood I LOVED it when Norman beat Duke to death! 4 stars
7/18/11 The Big D Duane, aka Duke, thought he was tough, but he was no match Norman's insanity! 4 stars
5/13/10 Scott Hill Very Well Done,Perkins direction is excellent in terms of camera work and the use of colors 4 stars
11/07/09 PAUL SHORTT PREDICTABLE AND TEDIOUS, RATHER THAN SCARY OR SUSPENSEFUL 2 stars
12/30/07 Sugarfoot The weakest of series, but still better than average for the genre. 3 stars
5/15/07 action movie fan decent rehash of the oringinal-has atmosphere 3 stars
4/28/07 David Pollastrini a pretty good sequel 4 stars
12/22/06 David Pollastrini not great, not terrible 3 stars
1/02/06 cody a dropoff from part 2, the only thing saves flick from 1 star is the ending perkins perf. 2 stars
11/08/05 Joe Clark Some interesting camera work, love mother in Cabin 12! 4 stars
12/11/04 Al Guy Probably would have been better standing on its own. 3 stars
12/06/04 Monster W. Kung Utter junk! 1 stars
6/07/04 Ryan Clark Perkins understands Norman more than anyone, but this is another slasher film in disguise. 3 stars
3/23/04 Trannon Goble Good Film 4 stars
2/23/04 john somewhat tries to continue the story but its strictly by the numbers 3 stars
8/16/03 J The movie Psycho 3 will get you cuirous. If you don't like it, then your the psycho. 4 stars
8/12/03 Double G Please all Psyco Movie SUCK!!! 1 stars
4/03/03 Zach No. 1 stars
2/05/03 Charles Tatum Awful 1 stars
8/16/02 Shaun hey, it was fun. Norman falls in love 3 stars
1/17/02 David A. Stylish, scary, and innovative. Although it's a sequel, it could stand on its own. 5 stars
10/16/01 Andrew Carden Extremly Well Done Sequel, Perkins Should Have Gotten Something For His Role. 5 stars
8/07/01 Mr. Hat It's so bad we could torture war criminals w/ it. 1 stars
8/06/01 E-Funk Not bad...Kind of a Friday the 13th spin on this franchise 4 stars
3/25/01 Monster W. Kung Manages to be even worse than Psycho II. 1 stars
1/26/01 Diego Romero Bates is back! 5 stars
5/29/00 todd ok 4 stars
5/01/00 Gus Van Sant Good shite! 5 stars
4/21/00 screenplay writer(psycho 3) Fuck you!I'll beat the living shit out of you! 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  02-Jul-1986 (R)
  DVD: 13-Sep-2005

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2014, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast