More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Worth A Look: 23.21%
Average: 32.14%
Pretty Bad: 7.14%
Total Crap: 1.79%

3 reviews, 38 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Crazy Rich Asians by Peter Sobczynski

Meg, The by Jay Seaver

Island, The (2018) by Jay Seaver

Summer of '84 by Jay Seaver

BlacKkKlansman by Peter Sobczynski

Along with the Gods: The Last 49 Days by Jay Seaver

Along with the Gods: The Two Worlds by Jay Seaver

Mission: Impossible - Fallout by Jay Seaver

Stripped to Kill 2: Live Girls by Jack Sommersby

Ready Player One by Rob Gonsalves

subscribe to this feed

[] Buy posters from this movie
by Mel Valentin

"Groundbreaking effects + average story = still watchable."
4 stars

In the summer of 1982, Hollywood studios released five future science-fiction classics: "Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan," "E.T.: The Extraterrestrial," "Blade Runner," "John Carpenter's The Thing," and "Tron." Only "Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan," with its dedicated fanbase, and "E.T.: The Extraterrestrial" were sizable commercial hits. "Tron" arrived in mid-summer to mixed reviews, underperformed at the box office, and disappeared from theater screens within weeks. "Tron," however, came at a perfect time for the burgeoning video market. With its emphasis on cutting-edge special effects and a storyline to warm the binary-encoded hearts of computer and sci-fi geeks everywhere, attained "cult" status.

In Tron, programmers are called “users,” and their “programs” are personified into active, sentient characters that look and act like their creators. Users are regarded as deities by some programs. Other programs reject the existence of users as myths and superstition and persecute those who still believe in the users.. One user, Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges), a one-time employee of ENCOM, a Microsoft-like software company, hacks into the ENCOM mainframe via program (CLU) to uncover evidence that an ENCOM senior vice president, Ed Dillinger (David Warner), stole five video arcade games from Flynn, using the video grams to obtain a promotion and get Flynn terminated. ENCOM’s Master Control Program (MCP) de-rezzes Clu before he can find incriminating evidence.

In response to Flynn's hacking attempt, Dillinger and the MCP shut down access to the mainframe. Alan Bradley (Bruce Boxleitner), another programmer, tries to get Dillinger to lift the security ban, but fails. Suspecting Flynn’s involvement in the recent break-in, Bradley and his girlfriend, Lora (Cindy Morgan), an ENCOM scientist and Flynn’s ex, warn Flynn that Dillinger and Sark are aware of his activities. Flynn convinces Bradley and Lora to help him hack into the ENCOM mainframe. Bradley, suspicious of Dillinger and the MCP’s activities, hopes to upload his own security program, Tron, inside the mainframe at the same time. Aware of their plan, the MCP takes over a nearby experimental laser, digitizes Flynn, and sends him into the virtual world of sentient computer programs.

Inside the virtual world of Tron, the MCP's chief enforcer, Sark (Warner again), forces Flynn to play a jai-alai-like game against another program, Crom (Peter Jurasik). After a victorious Flynn refuses to “finish the game,” Sark disposes of Crom. Almost immediately, Sark forces Flynn to participate in another game, this time using “Light Cycles” as part of a team that includes Ram (Dan Shor), an actuarial program, and Tron (Boxleitner again), Bradley’s security program. Together, they escape from the arena to disable and defeat the MCP. An attack by Sark's forces separates Flynn, Ram, and Tron. Tron seeks out another program, Yuri (Morgan again), for help.

Lisberger has claimed the inspiration for Tron came to him moments after he stepped inside a video arcade in the late 1970s. The idea turned a screenplay that would take several years of false starts and the development of computer animation (albeit in its earliest, crude form) and other visual effects to bring Lisberger’s vision to the screen. Lisberger ultimately brought Tron to Disney, obtaining unprecedented creative control for a first-time filmmaker. They supported Lisberger’s decision to hire Jean Giraud (a.k.a. Moebius of Heavy Metal fame) and futurist Syd Mead (Blade Runner). With computer animation still untried and undeveloped (not to mention limited computing power), Lisberger relied on “back-lit animation” (a process where the actors were filmed on bare soundstages against black-and-white backgrounds and later rotoscoped and colored).

Lisberger excelled in creating a virtual world rich with immersive possibilities. When it came to character development, however, Lisberger was on more unstable ground. The characters are flat, one-dimensional, and unengaging in the real world or the virtual one. Over the course of Tron’s two-hour running time, we learn little about the central characters that isn’t spelled out within the first few minutes (e.g., Flynn and Bradley are computer programmers, Flynns’s out for revenge, Dillinger a power-hungry executive, Lori a scientist and dual romantic interest, etc.). The simplistic plot involves virtual gladiatorial contests and a race to stop the MCP before it takes over the government's computer systems (an idea reminiscent of 1971's Colossus: The Forbin Project). Lisberger (Slipstream, Hot Pursuit) obviously didn’t know much about character development or pacing (and his staging tends toward the shallow end of the filmmaking pool), but he made up for his flaws as a storyteller through Tron’s innovative visual design.

Not surprisingly, "Tron" opened to mixed reviews from critics and underwhelming box-office numbers. An arcade game was more financially successful, ultimately generating more revenue than the film itself. Lisberger's shortcomings as a storyteller played a part, probably a large part, in "Tron's" under-performance at the box office. Lisberger's vision of a simulated gaming world, however, influenced video game designers and the richly imagined, complex worlds video gamers experience today, as well as influencing an another sub-genre, cyber-punk (e.g., William Gibson's "Neuromancer," "Count Zero," and "Mona Lisa Overdrive"), that was just getting started.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 06/04/08 05:27:35
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

10/05/12 mike miller a fun watch back to back with the new Tron Movie 4 stars
2/28/12 Dr.Lao Flashy, but never rises above the level of 2nd rate kiddie fare 3 stars
3/11/11 sunny day Way more creative and cleverer than Blade Runner. 5 stars
1/18/11 Ernesto Catalan Probably way too ahead of its time, TRON stll mesmerizes and is awesome fun to watch! 5 stars
12/18/10 bored mom Only the programming-literate will have the most fun and get the biggest joke in Tron. 5 stars
12/18/10 DK Ahead of its time thematically, but still very flawed in terms of traditional filmmaking 3 stars
8/25/08 George Barksdale One of the best SciFi movies made 5 stars
4/02/07 fools♫gold Screw "The Matrix," indeed. Still seems hi-tech to me (antagonizing the reviewer). 5 stars
3/26/07 2020 armagetron superb... predates concern about net neutrality 5 stars
10/19/05 Ry Great Idea 5 stars
8/23/05 ES A movie that while amazing for its time cannot bare the full brunt of time's telling 2 stars
1/17/05 1337 |-|4x0r 73|-| 0r161/\/4|_ |-|4x0r /\/\0\/13!!!1!!1111!!!!! 5 stars
5/31/04 Nobody This is a very strange movie. 2 stars
3/30/04 Gray weird, ahead of its time, intense in parts 4 stars
2/18/04 john as off beat today as it was then - fun but simply doesn't come together 3 stars
7/03/03 Lush An admirabley bold film in such an early time, but now, it's really naff and dated. 2 stars
6/16/03 Mr. Do unique! Misunderstood, unfortunately. 5 stars
4/19/03 Ubu the Ripper Bleeding edge special effects. Horrid script. Painful acting. 3 stars
3/12/03 Butterball Cenobite story is slight, but the FX and computer animation are still startling 4 stars
1/02/03 Monster W. Kung Interesting. Quite a few ways to interpret it, too. Bad music, and a little slow at times. 4 stars
12/22/02 murat A unique film of all time I am waiting for a good sequel 5 stars
1/21/02 D'Morph Its still pretty good, even after all this time! Liked the cutesy effects! 4 stars
1/13/02 Andrew Carden The Effects Were Cool, but It Wasn't Very Good. Kinda Flat. 3 stars
8/21/01 Paul far ahead of its time, still looks good today 4 stars
5/09/01 Alissa Schirmer It sucked 1 stars
1/24/01 dave Underhill marvolus!! 5 stars
1/07/01 Michael Ashton Maybe the script is a bit lame, but this film still kicks ASS! 5 stars
8/18/00 Chris Drake Even better in 2000 than 1982-gorgeous underrated thriller 5 stars
7/31/00 Rogue Librarian Lazy script that shreds a cool idea (what would cyberspace be like), but excellent effects! 3 stars
6/08/00 DREDD Loved the idea, watched it a million times.. 5 stars
3/22/00 Lame-Oh One word: amazing! 5 stars
3/05/00 Carolyn A true visual effects epic. 5 stars
1/30/00 Chris Snead Great! 5 stars
12/17/99 Paradox The lightcycle scenes kick ass! 5 stars
12/17/99 Fenris Another "ahead-of-its-time" movie... spectacular. 5 stars
12/17/99 Fork The biggest bomb of all time is one of my definite favorites. 4 stars
11/03/99 Todd Made in 1982 and it still looks better than most sci-fi movies. 5 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  02-Aug-1982 (PG)
  DVD: 05-Apr-2011



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast