More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
1.91

Awesome: 0%
Worth A Look: 9.09%
Average: 0%
Pretty Bad63.64%
Total Crap: 27.27%

1 review, 5 user ratings


Latest Reviews

I Have a Date with Spring by Jay Seaver

Halloween (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

All About Nina by Jay Seaver

Lost, Found by Jay Seaver

Night of the Living Dead (1968) by Rob Gonsalves

Neomanila by Jay Seaver

First Man by Peter Sobczynski

Bad Times At The El Royale by Peter Sobczynski

Being Natural by Jay Seaver

Suspiria (1978) by Rob Gonsalves

subscribe to this feed


Greatest Showman, The
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Jay Seaver

"Nowhere near the greatest show."
2 stars

I feel for Hugh Jackman and everyone else who can both act and sing - there was something magical about the classic movie musicals of decades past, and every once in a while you see one that does something great with the form. But too often, their desire to do a musical leads them to sign on to things like "The Greatest Showman", where they idea seems much more exciting than anything that could come of it. There may be a fine moment or two in the final film, but it spends most of its time somewhere between bad and unwatchable.

Initially, it just seem thin, which isn't necessarily a problem. Indeed, more films could do with sprinting through the foundational stuff the way this one does, having young tailor's son Phineas Barnum (Ellis Rubin) meet and fall for Charity Hallett (Skylar Dunn) with little more than a sight gag and a montage before they're grown, played by Jackman and Michelle Williams, and raising two adorable moppets (Austyn Johnson & Cameron Seely) of their own. It plants enough of a seed of an inferiority complex to be referenced later without giving the whole opening act over to a different cast or investing too much in any one specific symbol, and if it drags, it's still a good job of seemingly delivering all the depth certain elements appear to need.

Still, that efficiency can easily turn into just not doing necessary work. The film gets to a moment when Barnum and the audience are looking out the window of his soul-crushing office job and sees a landscape divided between another building filed with sad drones and a cemetery, and while the filmmakers obvious are still trying to get to the good stuff, it hasn't earned that shot yet. Admittedly, I hate that image more than most - it tends to smack of condescension when not used with care, like the artist can't bear imagine punching the clock the way his or her audience does, and this film has spent roughly twelve seconds on trying to show that Barnum is not suited for that sort of life. It's one of the first of many times that director Michael Gracey and writers Jenny Bicks and Bill Condon rely on familiar patterns rather than specific actions to build the story, but one that feels particularly weightless: It's where they could have shown sort of spark within Barnum, but instead just serves as the set-up for a little off-screen opportunism on Barnum's part.

That the filmmakers choose to have Barnum borrow the capital for his first museum based upon the stolen deed for a sunken ship off-screen highlights what a relatively sanitized version of his story is being sold here: At no point between him being sad in and office and a scene near the end where his harshest critic (Paul Sparks) tells him that he's done a good thing does it actually show Barnum as a particular genius, or creative. No, he's just a well-meaning guy with whose ideas come from nowhere and are executed between cuts, and whose exploitation of other people is only seldom obviously cruel or mean-sprouted. He may not exactly be heroic, but he's also never the sort of person that "there's a sucker born every minute" can even mistakenly be attributed to. Jackman seems to come more to life the more flawed that Barnum is allowed to be, even as he's genuinely warm in the scenes with his character's family, but for the star of a movie calling itself "The Greatest Showman", but he's not given a lot of chances to get into how Barnum could hustle or make the circus come more alive, and he's passable rather than charismatic as a result. The important moments either happen off-screen or as part of a musical number, and while those are entertaining, they amplify everyone, not just Barnum.

(They are decent performances taken in isolation - the contemporary-style songs by Benj Pasek & Justin Paul may not be the most memorable after one viewing, or really designed to move the story forward rather than stop it, but they're enjoyable as the audience hears them, and nobody charged with singing and dancing stumbles. Gracey and a team of six editors chop things up a bit more than is ideal for those in the Danny Kaye school of "show every step" would approve of, but these numbers are always visually striking.)

Despite looking good, the movie is rather bland, like the filmmakers have chosen the basic shape of a story but not filled it out. Barnum feuds with a snobbish critic, chases respectability, neglects his family; the younger partner he brings in (Zac Efron) falls for a black trapeze artist (Zendaya), which would scandalize his respectable white family. Every once in a while, they stop for a song that explains things, but they never do anything but go through the morons aside from singing. A great musical has songs that feel like the characters' passion is exploding into verse and fantasy; this one has performances that have been fired into a disappointing, needlessly generic framework.

I totally get why Jackman, Efron, Zendaya, et al would want to do something like this, and chances to make a musical don't come around nearly as often as they did the middle of the twentieth century. That's just an explanation for making this movie, though, not an excuse for taking something that should be larger than life and making it boring.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=28372&reviewer=371
originally posted: 12/29/17 11:18:05
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

8/27/18 Tony Brubaker Hugh Jackman is a pile of dog-shit (freshly excreted out of a mongrels arse). 1 stars
3/18/18 Hugh Jackman's face at the Golden Globes Goodwill after LOGAN > pppffffffffffffffffffftttttt-* 2 stars
2/14/18 the giver of the law This rubbish wouldn`t have passed muster in the 1950`s, let alone now ! ! !. 1 stars
12/30/17 ActionMovieFan A laughable embarrassing cinematic joke, almost unwatchable. 1 stars
12/22/17 Bob Dog Lacking as a Barnum biopic, but works fine as an old school musical. 4 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  20-Dec-2017 (PG)

UK
  26-Dec-2017 (PG)

Australia
  26-Dec-2017 (PG)


Directed by
  Michael Gracey

Written by
  Jenny Bicks
  Bill Condon

Cast
  Hugh Jackman
  Zac Efron
  Michelle Williams
  Rebecca Ferguson
  Zendaya
  Paul Sparks



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast