by Rob Gonsalves
A slow-burn psychological thriller like 'They Remain' requires patience. It seems to be more about mood and paranoia than about plot or easy scares â€” kind of like John Carpenterâ€™s 'The Thing' but more minimalist, if thatâ€™s even imaginable.Most of the movie is a two-hand exercise, showcasing two actors â€” William Jackson Harper and Rebecca Henderson â€” as scientists and former lovers who spend several weeks in an isolated woodsy area, measuring this and that, reporting on their meager findings. The woods, precisely photographed by Sean Kirby, amount to a third character, although we meet a sardonic pilot who interacts briefly with the scientists while picking up some evidence. The area is of interest for two reasons: animals are acting oddly, and the site was once home to a murderous cult. They may have left unfound corpses in the woods; some of the cult members may still be out there somewhere.
"Bring some patience."
Ah, yes, Out There Somewhere, that time-honored horror trope. They Remain, adapted by writer/director Philip Gelatt from a story by Laird Barron, takes pains to maintain its ambiguity. Aliens? Demonic possession? Minds cracking under stress and isolation? Weâ€™re kept in the dark for a long time, and despite the filmâ€™s small footprint on the afternoon, it feels like a long time. The pace is obviously glacial for a reason, and achieves what Gelatt is going for, a meditative freak-out that runs partly on the scientistsâ€™ experience of boredom and repetition. Its ornery long-take rhythm may attract a small cult audience that zones out blissfully on draggy sci-fi (2001, Solaris, The Man Who Fell to Earth, Blade Runner 2049 -- and I should say that with these films, I don't intend "draggy" as a pejorative).
Might this have been happier at half the length as an X-Files episode? The scientists, particularly the man, get more and more fearful â€” the story is told through his eyes, so the woman becomes more and more suspect. Given that these characters could be of any color (or gender â€” they could be former gay male or female lovers), are we to place much importance on the identities of the male as African-American and the female as Caucasian? One could engage in quite a chunk of racial theorizing if not for the possibility that, like Duane Jones in Night of the Living Dead, the best actor for the role also happened to be black. Whether the various racial subtexts were or werenâ€™t placed there, instead of cropping up on their own, we canâ€™t quite help viewing the relationship and its attendant conflicts and rapid devolution through this filter, even though the text yields no drama about, or even acknowledgment of, the manâ€™s race.
There sure is acknowledgment of the womanâ€™s gender, though; at one point the man unleashes an existential howl of â€śBitch!â€ť The text, elusive as it is, doesnâ€™t seem to disagree. But here I am, calling the movie a â€śtext,â€ť three times now. An artsy patience-tester like They Remain (named to win some association with It Follows?) seems to demand to be read. The mood is all, and Gelatt is on point there, weaving a tapestry of curiosity and dread out of its Malick-esque visuals and its oddball score (by Tom Keohane) â€” he tries to make this underpopulated, one-location movie cinematic. The quietude is sometimes broken, too, by the charactersâ€™ nightmare visions of the cultists drifting around the trees and performing barely-glimpsed offenses to decency.
The land itself seems to be demonic, infesting its inhabitants with bad self-annihilating vibes. The soil contains secrets and mysteries, among them skeletons a hundred years old. We could say this cursed earth is America itself, built on the bones of the indigenous and the captured, and the text â€¦. There we go again. Could They Remain be after something so banal as a built-on-Indian-burial-ground story, wrathful ghosts pitting black against white, woman against man, even in the hermetic context of a remote laboratory in a field? Itâ€™s worth asking why Carpenterâ€™s Thing, which theoretically should attract lots of academic woolgathering, seems to exist completely outside of interpretation. Carpenter just said â€śThese guys donâ€™t trust each otherâ€ť and that was that. The image of a black man and a white man facing each other with affable nihilism at the end of The Thing, with neither us nor them knowing who was human, doesnâ€™t seem to mean anything outside of itself.That sort of thing sure seems to mean something in "They Remain." But what?
link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=32094&reviewer=416
originally posted: 02/22/18 08:01:38