More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.36

Awesome: 4.44%
Worth A Look: 8.89%
Average: 24.44%
Pretty Bad42.22%
Total Crap: 20%

3 reviews, 27 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Wonder Wheel by Peter Sobczynski

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by Rob Gonsalves

Swindlers, The by Jay Seaver

Oro (Gold) by Jay Seaver

Disaster Artist, The by Peter Sobczynski

Explosion by Jay Seaver

Lucky (2017) by Rob Gonsalves

Breadwinner, The by Jay Seaver

Endless, The by Jay Seaver

Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets by Rob Gonsalves

subscribe to this feed


102 Dalmatians
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"Run for your lives! It’s the ghost of Walt Disney, and he’s pissed!"
2 stars

When Walt Disney was alive, his company produced quite a few truly great movies, as well as some remarkably stupid ones (“The Three Lives of Thomasina” springs to mind, though I wish it wouldn’t). The thing they all had in common was that none of them smelled of having been produced JUST to make money. Most of them were profitable, of course -- but they usually had some artistic merit, too. And the ones that were worthless at least were innocuous and low-budget.

The moment Walt Disney died, the Disney company set fire to his grave and danced around it in a pagan ritual of commercialism. This was silly, of course, as the moment Walt Disney died, he was not yet in his grave. But as a symbolic act, you get the point. Ever since then, many Disney films have been very good, but many others have had the artistic worth of a chest x-ray.

Which brings us to “102 Dalmatians,” which would surely have Walt turning over in his grave if it weren’t for the ill-conceived fire mentioned earlier. It is a sequel to the 1996 hit film “101 Dalmatians,” which was completely unnecessary, as a perfectly good cartoon version of this story already existed. A sequel to an unnecessary movie has an uphill battle as it is, and it doesn’t help when the filmmakers take the brake off and just coast backwards.

Both films have the exact same plot: Cruella De Vil (played by Glenn Close so that the character is even more of a cartoon than the animated version was) wants to kill Dalmatian puppies and make clothes out of them; she kidnaps many puppies; the puppies, who are supernaturally smart, escape with little help from any humans, who are supernaturally not-smart; Cruella falls into a big vat of something; parents, foolishly thinking that Dalmatians being cute = Dalmatians being good pets, go out and get some for their toddlers, who lose interest in a matter of seconds, and the dogs go to the pound.

The 1996 film had the overriding theme of: Puppies are cute. It is hard to argue with this statement, and the film does do a good job of establishing it, showcasing several dozen actual puppies who do adorable things and who, after shooting was finished, were put in sacks and beaten to death with sticks. (The American Humane Society was on-set to make sure the beatings were administered with appropriate dignity.)

The sequel, however, lacks even that basic depth. The theme of “102 Dalmatians” is that people cannot change, so you shouldn’t trust them. See, Cruella De Vil has been released on parole, and she is a reformed woman. However, her parole officer doesn’t believe her, and she scolds a kind-hearted animal shelter owner who does. (The trusting guy is played by an actor named Ioan Gruffud, by the way, a name which surely must be the result of several typographical errors.) And it turns out the cynical woman was right, as Cruella’s reform is short-lived and she’s back cheerfully murdering puppies before you know it, ripping their spotted esophaguses out with her fang-like teeth.

The message? Don’t trust people. They can’t change. Parents, be sure to take your kids to see this movie several times to reinforce the message! And then buy lots of Dalmatian-oriented merchandise! And then buy the special-edition DVD when it comes out! And then take a family vacation to Disneyland and spend $12,000,000 in three days!

And then flee in terror, because Walt is out for blood.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=3446&reviewer=247
originally posted: 03/07/01 17:55:29
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

9/14/08 Samantha Pruitt not as good as original but still fun! 3 stars
7/19/08 Susan Lee decent family film.. not up to par to original 3 stars
3/20/08 David Cohen It is a shame that Disney has decided that its audience is made up of morons 2 stars
3/20/07 Stanley Thai Overall, a really good entertainment for the kids. They will love it! 4 stars
8/28/05 Quigley another dopey live-action cartoon where characters survive impossible scenarios. total crap 1 stars
6/02/04 Sean Scanlan I dislike this sequel 1 stars
12/31/03 HELLOWEEN where the hell is Michael Myers?? This movie sucks! 1 stars
8/12/03 Double G most sequals suck, and this was is one of them!!! 1 stars
3/20/03 Shadaan Felfeli I hate sequels. I sat through it though. 3 stars
10/07/02 Sugarpants Complete crap! Dumb kids movie that even had my 9 year old niece rolling her eyes! 2 stars
8/08/01 Mr. Hat Not a lot of people like this one as much as the first, but I liked it. 4 stars
4/16/01 Rampage I agree with you Greg Muskewitz! What a load of garbage! 2 stars
4/13/01 Jed I pretty much agree with D.F.E it was confusing yet still funny. 3 stars
3/27/01 abe simmons it as a very good family movie 4 stars
3/26/01 visit: www.sip.f2s.com sux 2 stars
12/22/00 Viking Poor old Dodie Smith (the author of the original book) must be spinning in her grave !!! 2 stars
12/19/00 Thrillhouse Would've been better if Cruella took out a AK47 and killed all of those damn dogs. Very bad 1 stars
12/17/00 Christopher Myst Brent, you're wrong, Disney is pushing it for Oscars--seriously! 1 stars
12/13/00 Brent Young It's cute & has cool dogs. Remember this wasn't made for an Oscar, It's really cool movie. 5 stars
12/08/00 Boy In The Designer Bubble Kill the damn dogs and give the woman her coat. 1 stars
11/30/00 Zipperneck Unless you need to know from where Happy Meal toys emanate, stay home and shave your back. 1 stars
11/28/00 BLUZKAT DEFINITELY NOT GOING TO SEE IT NOW THAT I KNOW THE TRUTH THAT IT SUCKS! 1 stars
11/28/00 pipeman Cute. Better than the first one. Glenn Close's costumes rock! 4 stars
11/28/00 Adam Miller Its ok. could have been better. I say wait for the video 3 stars
11/26/00 Stuntman Not as good as the first one, but still pretty bad. I agree with you, Greg Muskewitz! 2 stars
11/24/00 Katie n marc cool 5 stars
11/23/00 Ground Zero After seeing this movie, I wanted to spay dogs. 2 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  22-Nov-2000 (PG)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  26-Dec-2000 (G)




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast