More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.81

Awesome: 11.54%
Worth A Look: 15.38%
Average: 19.23%
Pretty Bad50%
Total Crap: 3.85%

2 reviews, 14 user ratings



Phantom of the Opera (1943)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by MP Bartley

"Too much opera, not enough Phantom."
2 stars

Whenever a bad remake comes out, inevitably you will have people sighing, stroking their chins and saying "Ah, they should have never tempered with the original". But with so many versions of 'The Phantom of the Opera' available, it's highly unlikely that this version is one that people will be remembering fondly. Perhaps the story of the Phantom is one that will never translate well to film?

It's practically the same as the recent Joel Schumacher mis-fire. A member of the orchestra and would-be composer (Claude Raines) is fired from his job. To make matters worse, the chorus girl he's infatuated with, Christine, has two new suitors to occupy her time and a new musical piece he's been slaving away on has just been stolen by another member of the orchestra.

In a fit of rage he murders the man who has 'stolen' his work, but also takes an unfortunate tray of acid in the face. The Phantom then disappears into the sewers to haunt the opera house and try to further Christine's career.

So what does it have over Schumacher's recent version? For a start, Claude Raines. Whereas Gerard Butler was as limp as a lettuce leaf in a puddle of water, Raines commands and scares as the Phantom. His rich voice drips with pain and anger and his spectre haunts the film. Moments when he does appear, such as to kill off a rival of Christine's carry a genuine suspenseful impact, as does the revelation of his scarred face. And the chandelier crash isn't messed up here, luckily.

And it (thankfully) isn't as long, so the pain isn't dragged out as much as Schumacher made us endure it. However...this version still isn't particularly good.

Because as good as Raines is, he's just not in it enough. Instead we have endless scenes of warbling opera (except none of the Lloyd Webber's tunes) and a dull love triangle between Christine, a policeman and a baritone. Why is it so difficult for directors and writers to understand that in the 'Phantom of the Opera' we're really quite keen to see the Phantom?

As colourful as it is, 'The Phantom of the Opera' still has little interest besides Raines' performance. It may not be as wincingly dull or annoying as Schumachers version...but it's not far behind.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=3628&reviewer=293
originally posted: 01/06/05 02:09:04
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

7/13/10 Josie Cotton is a goddess Has great production values and lavesh musical numbers, but forgets that it's a horror film 3 stars
1/16/09 Anonymous. i preferred the recent remake. 3 stars
8/10/06 Dragon The Artist BORING rehash,& his scar looked faker than the entrails on Snakehead Terror,CORNY!! 1 stars
2/03/06 Chris Souter First color(Oscar winner) and sound version. Nelson Eddy & Foster's voices were thrilling. 4 stars
2/12/05 J. Elaine Greenup a classic 4 stars
1/30/05 R.W. Welch The great Claude Raines just manages to keep this one afloat. 3 stars
1/15/05 Hawkeye Pierce To much Opera, no match compared to 1925 version, Rains still ROCKS (LOVE YOUR CLASSICS) 4 stars
1/12/05 Ron Newbold Ok and unique in the Universal monsters being in color 3 stars
9/07/04 David Fowler Flawed, but exquisite and atmospheric. Rains is brilliant. Gorgeous score by Ward. Classic! 5 stars
8/20/04 Sean Scanlan Wonderful acting and singing 5 stars
8/03/04 Sean Scanlan This movie is bright 5 stars
1/20/04 Charles Tatum A stunning bore, all opera, little phantom 2 stars
4/02/01 Andrew Carden I agree that The Phanom needs to show up a bit more. 4 stars
6/30/00 Dr.Acula Rains is sypathetic as the scorn musican,too much Nelson Eddy and not enough Phantom. 3 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  02-Sep-1943 (NR)
  DVD: 12-Apr-2005

UK
  N/A

Australia
  02-Feb-1944




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast