More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 12.24%
Worth A Look: 20.41%
Average: 12.24%
Pretty Bad40.82%
Total Crap: 14.29%

2 reviews, 37 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Mandy by Rob Gonsalves

Road Not Taken, The by Jay Seaver

Great Battle, The by Jay Seaver

True Fiction by Jay Seaver

Pick of the Litter by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Peter Sobczynski

House With A Clock In Its Walls, The by Peter Sobczynski

Life Itself (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

Unity of Heroes by Jay Seaver

Hanagatami by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Original Sin
[] Buy posters from this movie
by Dust For Eyes

2 stars

I am not sold on Angelina Jolie's Motor-Psycho Whiplash Girl for Jesus persona. Whether you are or not will greatly influence your degree of acceptance for this film.

Now, I'm not totally convinced that Jolie is actually that good looking. Yes, she's extraordinary looking, but whether that's extraordinarily good or extraordinarily bad is something I'm not too sure about. I think I tend towards the latter.

It's that car crash of a mouth she's got. Just what random collection of genes brought that about? She's very modern looking and an acquired taste. Which means that she's an odd choice for the role of Julia in Original Sin.

Banderas plays a wealthy property owner in Cuba in the 1900s who sends off for a mail order style wife from America. It comes along in the form of Angelina Jolie.

They get off to an uncertain start with Jolie looking a lot better than the photograph she had earlier sent and Banderas informing that he is in fact a whole lot wealthier than a clerk which he had informed as his occupation. So we have a blind date/marriage situation where she's better looking than she said and he's richer than he said. Well how about that!

Never mind they are married the afternoon they meet.

And they live blissfully happy for the rest of their lives, everything is great, happiness for everyone and the movie ends after twenty minutes.

Well actually no, that's not what happens.

With the revealed falsehoods in their first meeting setting the tone of the film, nothing is quite like it seems.

Instead of a story of marital bliss we get a story of passion, lies, betrayal, murder and all manner of good stuff.

Photographed by Rodrigo Prieto who did the excellent Amores Perros (I could not implore you more to go see that excellent film), this stylish film has a lot of beauty in its photography as well as in its protagonists. The direction from Cristofer is classy with new-wavish cut up editing thrown in when the emotions become heightened.

The film had to have some steamy scenes edited out to appease American Censors into not giving it the NC-17 rating that was especially made for soft core rollicking. Not sure if the version I saw is the cut down American version or the original one. Either way what's left does get steamy enough to fog over your glasses.

For the most part, the story winds and loops its way pleasingly, although the ending was a little bit too Hollywood for me. Guessing what's what and what's not is rather tricky with hints and red herrings flying this way and that. Yet the ending that you come to expect to happen, doesn't. The ending you get instead is a bit hollow and unjustified.

The film had some lofty goals yet comes across as trying to have it in more ways than it can handle or deserves. It's not steamy enough for some sort of sex romp, not dramatic enough for an emotional epic, and not romantic enough for a romance. It's lost somewhere in the middle and you'll leave the cinema wishing the film would make up its mind with what it wants to be.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 12/01/01 19:05:37
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

11/05/15 David Hollingsworth Original crap 1 stars
1/31/13 jcar a ok movie with good acting by joile and banderas, great sex scenes but that is it 3 stars
2/07/11 gloria enjoyable. 4 stars
10/16/08 veronika this bad movie has nothing common with great La Sirene du Mississippi by Francois Truffauts 2 stars
11/22/07 R.W.Welch Too convoluted to be taken seriously. Okay as pulp fiction. 3 stars
12/26/06 Darth Vader how can a man still be in love with such a whore??and jolie sucks with her porn lips 3 stars
11/09/05 Indrid Cold The setting elevates it slightly above complete blandness. 3 stars
10/07/05 Keshia Ramos Its one of my favorite movies 5 stars
6/01/05 tatum Rojas Zapatos Diarios; just by a copy of Celebrity Sleuth instead 2 stars
3/29/05 Vince I think it was all right. Nice atmosphere. 4 stars
5/31/04 Blakers a great film I loved it. 5 stars
11/22/03 jack cheap porn where you get to see boobs 3 stars
4/19/03 Amad Afzal It sucks! 1 stars
3/26/03 Jack Sommersby Telegraphs its plot turns and is way too slow. Interesting at first, though. 2 stars
11/26/02 Zargo it entertained me 4 stars
7/28/02 Butt almost unwatchable 1 stars
4/04/02 Soggy Bottom Boy Editing = BAD; AJ = nude; music = good; acting = so-so. Only watch if you're obsessed w/AJ 2 stars
4/02/02 George L. Friend Not a love story; not about love; all about lust 2 stars
2/28/02 Alan Smithee If you want to see Ms. Jolie nude, please rent Gia instead of this turd. 1 stars
1/14/02 Andrew Carden It Tries To Be Good, but Fails Totally, Leaving Behind A Bad Taste In Ya Mouth. 1 stars
12/10/01 Shaun Kelly A bad imitation of an Agatha Christie novel. Cheap,unsubtle changes in direction. 2 stars
12/03/01 Raymond Ocampo For a different feel of Hollywood stars instead of seeing them in typical Hollywood movies. 4 stars
12/02/01 Kelly I thought it was wonderful, steamy and enticing. It keeps you guessing to the end. 5 stars
12/02/01 Melanie Domingues altho a bit slow, the story was good...The actors did a grat job...Loved Banderas' butto 4 stars
10/08/01 rocksanne It freaking rocked 5 stars
9/20/01 The Red Queen I got in free and I still want my money back. 1 stars
8/25/01 Kathryn Weaver Wonderfully sexy! Very enticing for couples to see together!!! 4 stars
8/22/01 Gin Antonio and Angelina are the only reasons to go see this film. But that's enough for me! 2 stars
8/19/01 bett AWESOME!!!! 5 stars
8/11/01 Karen The reviewer has his head up his analogy. The movie is very good. 4 stars
8/10/01 Adrian angie...angie...angie... 4 stars
8/09/01 sdfk I actually liked the pacing of the ending commentary. Film was ok. 4 stars
8/09/01 daniel yep. pretty shitty. she's naked a bit though. 2 stars
8/07/01 malcolm one of the best non-X-rated sex scenes ever 3 stars
8/07/01 scully I have to say, phone book, Jolie, if she read it I would sit and listen. nuf said! 5 stars
8/07/01 Kurt Huber So bad that I think the producers owe everbody who saw it an apology 1 stars
8/03/01 Kimble Sexy Angelina 4 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  03-Aug-2001 (PG-13)


  06-Dec-2001 (M)

Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast