More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.64

Awesome: 24.03%
Worth A Look41.86%
Average: 13.18%
Pretty Bad: 16.28%
Total Crap: 4.65%

7 reviews, 87 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Fortress, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

Death Note: Light Up the New World by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Enemy at the Gates
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Andrew Howe

"Aims low, and hits its mark"
2 stars

“Get used to disappointment”. He probably didn’t realise it at the time, but when William Goldman penned those words for The Princess Bride he crafted a mantra for hardcore moviegoers the world over. Shattered expectations can become a way of life, and if I ever find myself walking that long and lonely highway Enemy at the Gates will shoulder its share of the blame for my disillusionment.

When the curtain rises on the latest collaboration between two consistently interesting French filmmakers, with acting duties shared by the likes of Ed Harris, Jude Law and Joseph Fiennes, the runs would seem to be on the board before the match even begins. Sure bets, however, have been the downfall of many a gambling man, and in this instance your losses will amount to the price of a ticket, two hours of your valuable time, and a portion of your dwindling supply of unconditional optimism.

Widely credited with helping to turn the tide of the war, the Battle of Stalingrad could provide the source material for a dozen memorable films. The tales of heroism and horror that have risen from its rubble-strewn streets are legion: fighting raged from building to building, to the extent that securing a single room in an apartment complex was considered a major victory, and Hitler and Stalin’s self-serving exhortations to fight to the last saw the slaughter continue long past the time when the city’s tactical significance ceased to exist.

The script concerns itself with the sniper conflicts which developed in the early stages of the battle. German bombing transformed the city into a marksman’s paradise, and Russian recruit Vassili (Jude Law) overcomes his initial fears to become the scourge of any German officer foolish enough to place his faith in inadequate cover (it’s worth noting that most of the victims are also indulging in a relaxing smoke, which suggests that nicotine addiction may have seriously compromised your chances of survival). Danilov (Joseph Fiennes), a Russian propagandist, uses Vassili’s body count to transform him into a national hero, which prompts the German high command to despatch their own expert sniper, Konig (Ed Harris), to put an end to Vassili’s reign of terror. The duel between Vassili and Konig occupies the lion’s share of the running time, with the occasional detour into a “lust in the foxholes” love triangle featuring Vassili, Danilov and Tania (Rachel Weisz), a member of the local militia who possesses an inflated estimation of her own combat-readiness.

If I were to leave it at that you’d probably be booking your ticket at the earliest opportunity, and the explosive opening scenes which depict the carnage wrought by the German artillery and Luftwaffe on Russian boats crossing the Volga whet the appetite for another hard-edged meditation on the folly of armed conflict. It’s only about an hour into the film that you realise it’s starting to fall apart, and this understanding arrives when you detect an unusual absence of tension whenever one of the protagonists finds themselves in mortal danger.

When the time comes to script your monument to the men and women who fell during those troubled times, you’re faced with two options. The first is to craft an emotional powerhouse à la Saving Private Ryan, in which the viewer’s investment in the characters rams home the true horror of the human wreckage that lined the road to victory. The second is to cast a detached eye over the proceedings, echoing the dehumanisation suffered by many of those who participated in the slaughter (see The Thin Red Line, Hell is for Heroes and Joseph Vilsmaier‘s German-language Stalingrad for relevant case studies).

That Enemy at the Gates was destined to fall into the latter category should have been obvious from the outset – co-writers Jean-Jacques Annaud and Alain Goddard are not known for investing their scripts with a surfeit of emotion, as anyone who has slogged through The Name of the Rose and Quest for Fire will attest. However, while there’s no law which states that involving characters are essential to the success of a war movie, when your script consists of several one-on-one sniper duels you have to enable the viewer to gain an investment in the fate of the combatants, otherwise the set pieces (which are, by their nature, drawn out, since they consist of endless shots of stony-faced soldiers squinting through their telescopic lenses) will fall flat, and if there’s nothing else of interest going on you’re on a fast-track to tedium.

The script’s failure in this area is a function of both the characters and the setting. The Russian Front doesn’t lend itself to an immediate identification with the allied forces, since most Hollywood films concentrate on the exploits of British and American combatants. One might imagine that the simple fact that they’re fighting the Germans would be reason enough to support the Soviets, but the scriptwriters’ adherence to historical reality ensures it isn’t.

The actions of the allied army in Saving Private Ryan may not have been a textbook example of gentlemanly warfare, but at least it presented a united front. The Russian army, on the other hand, was known to motivate its soldiers by gunning down anyone craven enough to retreat from an entrenched German machine gun, but only when it wasn’t too busy offering its high-ranking scapegoats a choice between suicide and a holiday in Siberia. The film’s depiction of these events ensures that there’s no overriding sense of righteousness to the Russian cause, and when you combine this with a notable absence of German atrocities, identifiable supporting villains and background to the conflict and characters the major players are left to rise or fall on their individual merits.

Which is unfortunate, since they’re a particularly shallow and uninspiring crew. Despite spending two hours in their company, the scriptwriters’ refusal to invest them with histories, motivations, hopes or fears (apart from a fear of violent death, which we could probably have taken as a given) means that at no time do we feel that we know these people, and the absence of likeable characteristics further undermines any attempt to become involved in their plight (this is in stark contrast to the characters in Saving Private Ryan – most of them were allocated half as many lines, but you had a stake in the survival of each and every one of them).

For want of anything better to do, Vassili spends most of his time whining about how he can’t live up to the expectations Danilov has created (it worked for Paul Newman in Cool Hand Luke, but in that film the messianic subtext was expertly scripted), and Danilov is reduced to shoring up Vassili’s resolve while pacing around various enclosed spaces. Ron Perlman shows up just long enough to make you wonder why the writers bothered scripting his part in the first place (it was designed to prove just how fearsome Konig truly is, a fact which was already well-established), Bob Hoskins wanders in to let us know what a right bastard Nikita Kruschev really was, and Ed Harris conspires to make Konig the most interesting character in the entire film (his ability to capture Konig’s inner torment is so accomplished that there were moments when I almost found myself rooting for a German victory).

Which is not to say that Law and Fiennes turn in poor performances, but the lively and passionate Fiennes suffers from his underwritten role and Law, who isn’t the most expressive soul to begin with, is unable to extract the slightest trace of warmth from his character (I suspect the film may have been improved if their roles were reversed, but I guess we’ll never know). The director also earns a major black mark for allowing Law to retain his British accent – when he raves “I’ll get ‘im for you”, I was half-expecting Arthur Daley to emerge from the shadows and drag him away.

If this wasn’t bad enough, things take a major turn for the worse whenever Rachel Weisz appears on the screen. She takes her performance from The Mummy and drops it wholesale into her portrayal of the delectable Tania, and the result is an annoying, anachronistic turn which proves that she should stick to playing dizzy sidekicks (her attempts at portraying realistic grief are almost laughable).

While the relationship between Tania and Vassili has its moments (a scene in which they use each other’s bodies amidst the squalor is suitably disquieting), Danilov’s dose of unrequited love is difficult to credit. Since they share precious little screen time you suspect that it was included purely to allow the scriptwriters to pen a predictable (and suitably ridiculous) act of stupidity for Danilov at the end of the line, and any suggestion that his actions are the result of a man searching for simple affection in a time of madness stem from my own personal interpretation, rather than anything he actually says or does for the duration.

Despite the above flaws, the film may have been saved by a rousing dose of wartime action. Unfortunately, the plot is entirely predictable – you know from the outset how it’s going to end, and the road to the eventual outcome is not sufficiently diverting to stave off an inescapable sense of ennui. The explosions in the distance alert us to the fact that there’s all manner of interesting events going on over the rise, but instead we’re stuck with yet another dose of one-on-one in which the only unknown variable is which particular sidekick is going to cop the bullet meant for Vassili.

Luckily for the careers of everyone involved, it’s difficult to amass this level of talent and wind up with a complete failure on your hands. Ed Harris is worth the price of admission alone, the opening scenes are arresting (though the incongruous final scene uses up whatever goodwill these powerful sequences earn, and will have most viewers reaching for the bucket), and James Horner’s score is suitably sweeping, even if he does regurgitate much of his work for Glory.

But then faint praise, as we know, is damning of itself, and the script undermines whatever strengths the film possesses. Given the calibre of the cast and crew its failure is difficult to condone, and a waste of talent on this scale would, in a just world, earn Annaud and Godard a well-placed bullet apiece.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=4699&reviewer=193
originally posted: 07/27/01 13:58:08
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

9/13/17 morris campbell has its moments & some good acting 4 stars
1/02/14 Kingneutron Always a fan of Rachel Weisz- she lightened up an otherwise grim film 4 stars
6/09/08 PAUL SHORTT ERRATIC, BUT SOMETIMES THRILLING 3 stars
11/26/07 mb Ok, but could pass on it. 3 stars
9/29/06 I-K Tepid, overwrought and loose with the truth. Josef Vilsmaier's "Stalingrad" kills it. 2 stars
9/08/06 Thomas Semesky A different look at WW2. 4 stars
3/11/06 Dillon A personal war movie, using the war as a battleground for the fight between 2 men. 5 stars
1/08/06 gerry dunne wonderfully athmospheric and entertaining 4 stars
11/27/05 Alexey American soldiers in russian uniform. Too cheesy at times. Realistic at other. 4 stars
11/16/05 Adrian It's got soul, but it's not a soldier. Needs more direction, but its good while it lasts. 4 stars
9/29/05 Fernando Lastra good picture but no so real 4 stars
8/18/05 ES Finally a War story from a different perspective, felt very authentic to the times 5 stars
2/15/05 carlei great story... 5 stars
12/29/04 Andrea Brilliant! 5 stars
12/29/04 Monks is playas too only dog so dirty to lap up turd but too lazy to lick itself 1 stars
8/03/04 Anthony G this girl should be teabaged cuz she fucking stupid, this movie is sick 4 stars
7/26/04 You don't care This movie is one of my favorites because it's WWII and it's sniper vs sniper 5 stars
6/07/04 This girl A pointless turd of a movie that despite its occasional good elements, is still a turd. 1 stars
1/13/04 mmww See it, it is close to reality of the shit of war 5 stars
11/28/03 Kateryna Hrechko Such a Wonderful movie! 5 stars
11/14/03 snowconehead Very underrated epic scenes; unnecessary love story 4 stars
11/07/03 Capt' Fox Great war movie, realistic, great acting, worth time & $ to rent. Ignore romance crap. 5 stars
10/19/03 Julreub Polished, slick and rough all at once, not bad! 4 stars
9/28/03 Kyle I like Jude Law 4 stars
8/11/03 Nicole Completely agree about the unnecessary romance 3 stars
8/11/03 francis curiously uninvolving. unnecessary romance. 3 stars
7/04/03 Jim Leaves little doubt who the better sniper is, and it's not the one who wins. 4 stars
4/07/03 Jack Sommersby Awesome physcial scale but very little emotional depth. Contrived out the ying-yang. 2 stars
3/17/03 elizaveta good depiction of a side of ww2 that we don't often see. ignore the cheesy romance... 4 stars
2/07/03 123 good movie with out-of-placed romance 4 stars
11/10/02 Stevo Tedious and irritating. Sunset Beach-quality script. Annoying acting. 2 stars
8/12/02 GOOD its ok, but no saving private ryan 4 stars
7/01/02 Natalie Stonecipher Poignant. Bob Hoskins playing Nikita Krushchev especially outstanding. 4 stars
4/08/02 stoolie-bird boring....a waste of my time 2 stars
4/06/02 Junshi I didn't choose to watch this, but it isn't boring for sure, not jump-start exciting 4 stars
2/12/02 Yourm Ama the movie was good i enjoyed it 4 stars
2/09/02 Alex Pydd Great war movie, not the conventional tanks-planes-explosions bs, rent it! 5 stars
12/18/01 Martin grows tiresome! 3 stars
10/16/01 MaMaFaC KICKS ASS 5 stars
10/14/01 R.W. Welch Harris manages to save this flick but it's a close call. 4 stars
9/30/01 phil m. afficiando I'd have paid double to see it as a documentary, leaving out the crappola and sappiness. 3 stars
9/07/01 madatthismovie SNIPE WARS WHILE THE FRONT LINE SOLDIERS SIT IN A BUNKER FARTING ON CANDLES 1 stars
8/22/01 eruch realistic war scenes -- rest mostly crap 4 stars
8/22/01 Jim Renwick Only an OK war flick but looked good. Wait for the video. 4 stars
8/21/01 Monday Morning Romance had no place here. Fucking & fighting don't mix well in movies. 3 stars
8/20/01 Hawkeye A few story gaps, but over all a really nice film. Kept my attention right through! 4 stars
8/01/01 Al Primon Excellent. Hitchcock like suspense and opening sequence equal to that in S P Ryan. 5 stars
7/28/01 Steve Very gripping movie about a different part of WW2. Great insight into the trials of heroism 5 stars
6/26/01 Natasha Fox Depicts shocking realism and is of enormous social value 5 stars
6/15/01 zombie could have been great, but the love story fucked everything up 2 stars
6/10/01 Ramsey Could've been better! Ending needed work! 4 stars
5/30/01 Bud A tough no nonsense look at war. Severe well acted. I am glad that I saw it. 4 stars
5/07/01 Suzz good WW2 film 4 stars
5/03/01 Bueller Good movie. I liked it. But do we really need another movie that shows us "War is Hell"? 4 stars
5/02/01 SharPShooteR_12 One of the coolest movies out there.....Had some flaws, but it was wicked! 5 stars
5/01/01 Joey Great movie... one to get on DVD. 5 stars
4/26/01 y2mckay No Private Ryan, but good bullet-to-the-head action. Rachel Weisz is grimy and GORGEOUS. 4 stars
4/24/01 hairy cock lick my balls! 5 stars
4/23/01 goerge very fucking cool 5 stars
4/20/01 Jimmy Clendennen Awesome! 5 stars
4/18/01 Grey Great movie, Loved the bombing scene, Earthshaking!!! 5 stars
4/16/01 studmaster This movie should be called Enema on the Gates! 1 stars
4/13/01 Alexandre Pappamikail Awesome first 15m; it seems he wins the battle alone... over 1 million russians died!!! 4 stars
4/12/01 WWII Guy Incredibly inaccurate historically, but worth seeing. 4 stars
4/11/01 Gremlin Awesome sniper movie, loved seeing the Eastern front for once 5 stars
4/08/01 Joe W. Mendoza Thought the movie awsome as well as riviting & better than Saving Private Ryan. 5 stars
4/08/01 Gary Embrey Rather a bad film. As a historian of WW2 I was very disappointed! 2 stars
4/08/01 Andrew Deikun The action sequences are good, the middle part of the movie drags 3 stars
4/03/01 kohawk The most bizarre, disgusting sex scene I've ever seen. Too long, not plausible 3 stars
4/02/01 CBSAND Hard to know who to root for. The evil Germans or the even worse Soviets. 4 stars
4/02/01 NONE YA MAN I LOVED THIS FUCKING AWESOME MOVIE 5 stars
4/01/01 Dmitriy Mestetskiy the best 5 stars
4/01/01 Viccy Powerful visuals (Jude Law included!) bit overlong, but worth it 5 stars
3/30/01 The Reviewer some great performances -ed harris. ending does suck though. 5 stars
3/29/01 Wolvie Snipers Rule!!!! 4 stars
3/29/01 chris dirty and all, jude law was hot!!! 4 stars
3/26/01 Mike Smith No consistency 2 stars
3/24/01 Paul Like Saving Private Ryan, starts off with a wallop! Never quite regains momentum after. 4 stars
3/23/01 JB If the whole movie was a show down in the wasteland it would be great. A horrible ending. 3 stars
3/22/01 guyguy this is gay 1 stars
3/21/01 Andrew Ratliff Not bad. 4 stars
3/20/01 Matthew Bartley Characters a bit cardboard but v.suspenseful with some amazing visuals 4 stars
3/19/01 Will Wouldn't have been that bad, if only there was no silly crap romance. Tsk, tsk. 3 stars
3/18/01 joe not really suspensful, but you still pay attention 4 stars
3/18/01 Weird Andy Lame! Check out the German flick "Stalingrad" instead. 2 stars
3/16/01 TheRock No suspense, bad acting, terrible ending = sucks 1 stars
3/13/01 TimmyP A Saving Private Ryan wannabe that falls apart 2 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  16-Mar-2001 (R)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  26-Jul-2001 (M)




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast