More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.33

Awesome: 11.11%
Worth A Look: 0%
Average: 0%
Pretty Bad88.89%
Total Crap: 0%

1 review, 3 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Loving Vincent by Jay Seaver

Fortress, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Pandaemonium
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Natasha Theobald

"Muddled History"
2 stars

The best thing about this movie is that it may make you want to read the poetry of Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Wordsworth. The worst thing is its disregard for some of the generally accepted history of these two men, from the men themselves in their writing and those around them.

Coleridge is depicted as genius unleashed. He is unable to write or concentrate without a counterbalance. He is given to experimentation with life, including drugs. He is given to fits of creativity on the drugs, envisioning, among other things, his dream of "Kubla Khan," which is thought by some to be the result of opium delirium. This assertion is taken to the next level in the scene in which his wife recommends laudanum, a tincture of opium, for a toothache. He takes a little, then a little more, spiraling gradually more out of control, inspired in his frenzy to knock out "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" in one night.

Wordsworth is dealt an unfriendly blow. He is shown as a talentless hanger-on who has nothing real to offer and sucks the lifeblood of those with real inspiration. He is rigid and snobbish, without any originality or creativity. He also has a severe case of writer's block. His motives, according to this movie, are fame and recognition. He is willing to crush the fragile, more artistic souls around him to better his place in the world and gain the attention he so desperately needs.

This is when I dug out the old Norton anthology. Wordsworth isn't my favorite poet, I must say. I was forced to read The Prelude in college, and I'm still not quite over it. But, I think he was handled roughly by the film. I am fully understanding of the need for artistic license, but I think when you are dealing with the reputation of actual historical figures, it is unfair and somewhat irresponsible to distort and disfigure the truth.

From what I know, which, admittedly, is very limited, Coleridge and Wordsworth were their own little mutual admiration society. They lived in close proximity to one another for years, meeting daily to talk for hours about poetry and art, composing together in a symbiotic give and take of language and thought. Coleridge was already using laudanum regularly, having been prescribed the treatment early in his life for pain of some sort. Lyrical Ballads, with a Few Other Poems, released in 1798, was the result of this collaboration. The film asserts that the work was primarily from Coleridge, but the book actually contained several poems from Wordsworth, including "Lines Composed a Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey," my personal favorite among his work. They did have a falling out as in the movie, eventually, and reconciled some years later.

The movie is at its best when visualizing the poems themselves, making spoken word, music-like videos, bringing the ideas to life. We hear the voice of Coleridge speaking about the wintry landscape and see as the icy fingers crawl across the window glass. We see his vision of "Kubla Khan" brought to life in brilliant color. We are able to feel firsthand the affects of the drugs by what we are shown. We get to journey inside the mind of the artist.

Linus Roache is very interesting to watch as Coleridge. He has energy and life and makes the character easier to enjoy than his actions are to understand. John Hannah is Wordsworth. He plays the man as altogether unlikable, so it is difficult to like the man behind the man, as well. He is dry and reserved, making us wonder how these two ever found and learned to respect one another. Emily Woof brings fresh energy as Dorothy Wordsworth. Samantha Morton isn't given much to do as Coleridge's wife, Sara.

The film has an interesting view of the celebrity of the poets. If you don't mind your history with a twist, there are engaging things to enjoy visually, and it is lovely to hear the poems read.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=5374&reviewer=317
originally posted: 07/18/02 14:05:54
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

12/02/08 Shaun Wallner Very Boring! 2 stars
10/26/08 wandering cow think of it as a comedy and it's watchable 2 stars
10/24/03 C Harcourt love it 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  29-Jun-2001 (PG-13)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  02-Oct-2001




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast