More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 1.96%
Worth A Look: 9.8%
Average: 25.49%
Pretty Bad: 21.57%
Total Crap41.18%

4 reviews, 27 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Mortal Engines by Jay Seaver

Vox Lux by Peter Sobczynski

Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse by Peter Sobczynski

Vox Lux by alejandroariera

Parallel (2018) by Jay Seaver

Witch: Part 1 - The Subversion, The by Jay Seaver

Lôi Báo by Jay Seaver

Bohemian Rhapsody by Rob Gonsalves

Fireworks (2017) by Jay Seaver

Knuckleball (2018) by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

[] Buy posters from this movie
by Scott Weinberg

"Dick Impostor"
1 stars

Happy New Year! While the new year's dawning is cause for celebration in several places throughout the globe, one group of people loathe the new year, and all that it represents. Those people are moviegoers. Yep. It's January again. Much like how Groundhog Day can predict six additional weeks of winter, New Year's Day is a harbinger as well. January 1st is generally followed by two month's worth of the stupidest movies ever produced. Impostor is only the first one.

It's movies like this that make me annoyed at my chosen field. How the hell am I supposed to write a unique and original review for a film that wouldn't recognize originality if you bought it an all "O" dictionary? Based on a story by Philip K. Dick, the new idiot-fest known as Impostor is about as entertaining as the second of two bologna sandwiches.

From the very outset of the film, a feeling of familiar tedium sets in. The plot is of the barest sci-fi bones imaginable, with our protagonist running repeatedly from villains while blue strobe lights and Corman-seque FX pulsate in the background. Seriously, that's all there is.

There's not one line of dialogue in the first 25 minutes that is NOT clumsy-ass plot exposition, and the actors spouting this nonsense look mystified and lost. Gary Sinise is a scientist who has recently finished creating a massive weapon. This weapon will defend the Earth from the evil Alpha Centauris - whom we never see once. Great.

Anyway, the government is embodied by a portly E.S.A. (Earth Salvation Asses or something to that effect) agent played by Vincent D'Onofrio, an actor long past the point of reading scripts before signing contracts. Spencer (the scientist) also has a wife who is pretty. That she's also a doctor factors into the plot somehow, but perhaps "plot" is too kind a word. Madeline Stowe plays the wife, at least during the first 5 minutes and the final 10. Other than that, she's played by a vaporous dream sequence.

Spencer is suspected of being a replicant, one which houses a powerful bomb in its ribcage. That nobody takes a few minutes to actually confirm this suspicion medically is just one specific reason why this movie is so unremittngly stupid. But there are several others. I feel I've given more attention to this awful film than it deserves, but Impostor is quite notable for one reason; movies this bad generally start out as theatrical releases before being relagated to straight-to-video status. Somehow, this movie did it the other way around. Ah,'s January!

Originally intended as a 40-minute segment of an anthology film, Impostor is idiotically puffed up to a 95-minute running time. While the extra running time does indeed manage to make the film longer, there's just twice as much to yawn at.

The works of legendary sci-fi scribe Philip K. Dick have been the basis for some pretty damn good flicks, not the least of which were Blade Runner and Total Recall. While those films captured the stark and clinical cleverness of Dick's stories, Impostor is just warmed-up and lazy Hollywood Shit of the highest order.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 01/11/02 06:51:31
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

8/31/17 danR OK SF, nothing special, middle drags a bit, but good time-waster. 4 stars
6/21/04 Steve Newman This really is awful and lazy 1 stars
3/27/04 Eschenennock Manville Gary Sinise carries an otherwise overblown mess 4 stars
6/21/03 Jim Subtext on what it means to be human is drowned in a sea of ineptitude 2 stars
6/15/03 Jack Sommersby Slightly better than its rep. Entertaining, even though it lags in places. 3 stars
5/15/03 George Jung The worst kind of know, that sticky, can't wipe it off your ass shit. Oh well. 1 stars
4/10/03 Jack Bourbon This movie would've been great, had it been released in the year 1655, when it was made. 1 stars
1/28/03 Dani O. Blargh. Guh! Meh... 1 stars
10/09/02 spyguy2 It entertained me a hell of a lot more than Minority Report. I've seen worse. 3 stars
9/24/02 bullit17 What a waste of talents like Sinise and D'Onofrio 2 stars
8/30/02 JesseL This movie was SO bad it sucked its own ass! 1 stars
8/20/02 Billy Pimple I walked out two days after the end. I luv Kirk Douglas! 5 stars
2/20/02 Eschenennock Manville Gary Sinise carries an otherwise overblown mess 4 stars
2/15/02 Roy Smith If this movie had "by the Coen brothers" you all would love it. 3 stars
2/08/02 malcolm pretty slow mostly, nice ending though 3 stars
2/07/02 Vickie Have seen much worse. 3 stars
1/21/02 King Krack It fucking sucked, except for the very end. Fuck off Sinise 1 stars
1/12/02 Ed Miles Walked out after 10 minutes into the show 1 stars
1/11/02 Andrew Carden Totally Confusing, and Very Disappointing From Such A Praised Actor. 1 stars
1/10/02 Joe Bayes Kinda fun...but then again, I kinda like vintage SF 4 stars
1/09/02 Satanami69 ft, I farted right on her head. That was the highlight of this movie. 2 stars
1/09/02 Satanami69 This fat woman in front of me had to lean all the way back during the whole movie. As I le 2 stars
1/09/02 Dimes Obviously no one here ever read a P. K Dick novel or story. Very true to his style. 4 stars
1/08/02 Nyartholep What's the problem? don't expect too much, you'll have gun. 3 stars
1/07/02 Mr Math Sinise used to stand for quality... not any more. 2 stars
1/06/02 ^ZuLu^ Oh come on! Voice-operated-machines already existed in Blade Runner (Philip K. Dick!!!)! 3 stars
1/05/02 Banky Edwards .....barf...... 1 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  04-Jan-2002 (PG-13)



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast