More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 30%
Worth A Look41.25%
Average: 13.75%
Pretty Bad: 13.75%
Total Crap: 1.25%

6 reviews, 44 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Line Walker 2: Invisible Spy by Jay Seaver

Death of Dick Long, The by Jay Seaver

Blinded By the Light by Lybarger

Blinded By the Light by Peter Sobczynski

Good Boys by Peter Sobczynski

Divine Fury, The by Jay Seaver

Them That Follow by Jay Seaver

Bravest, The by Jay Seaver

Abyss, The by Rob Gonsalves

Bodies at Rest by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Count of Monte Cristo, The
[] Buy posters from this movie
by Erik Childress

"Count On The First Terrific Film of 2002"
4 stars

When William Sadler’s semi-literate prisoner picks up a copy of The Count of Monte Cristo for the new library in The Shawshank Redemption, he looks at the author’s name and says “Alex-an-dre Dumb-Ass”. Of course, its actually Alexandre Dumas, but when a cinematic trailblaze of his works in recent years come down to “The Three Musketeers” (1993), “The Man In The Iron Mask” (1998) and “The Musketeer” (2001), you can understand how one can make such an error in pronunciation. With the stench of that last title still being fumigated from movie theaters (plus a 30-mile radius around them) and a three-month push to the dumping ground of late January, Kevin Reynolds’ latest adaptation of a Dumas classic seemed ready to face the same predicament as its titular character. But the best revenge may just be living well because this film is far likened to a treasure than a lengthy jail sentence.

This is the 18th attempt in either film or television form to realize Dumas’ vision and it may be as faithful as you can get in just over two hours. Edmond Dantes (James Caviezel) and Fernand Mondego (Guy Pierce) are friends despite coming from different collared backgrounds. In an effort to save their captain’s life, they are forced to seek medical attention off the coast of Elba, where Napoleon Bonaparte just happens to be spending the rest of his days. For the use of his personal doctor, Napoleon entrusts a letter to Edmond to deliver back home. Mondego then feels slighted that his friend has kept him out of this particular loop.

With the prospect of promotion and the love of his beautiful fiance, Mercedes (Dagmara Dominczyk) in his life, Edmond is then the subject of betrayal on charges of treason. Sentenced to a new life of suffering in prison complete with anniversary beatings at the hands of sadistic prison warden Dorleac (the usually sadistic Michael Wincott), hope is all but lost for Dantes. Then, almost miraculously, Faria (Richard Harris), a fellow prisoner busts through the floor to his cell and believes he can find the path to freedom. In exchange for Dantes’ help, he will give him a better education than you’ll find in any public school these days and the directions to Napoleon’s hidden treasure, just a few steps on the path of revenge to the men who wronged him.

This setup, as already read by millions and seen by even more in the film’s previews, could have easily been put on high-speed dub to make way for what lesser filmmakers would have believed audiences were most interested in – The Revenge. But director Kevin Reynolds (Waterworld, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves) nicely lets things unfold at a steady pace so we can understand and appreciate all of the characters and their motivations. It’s great to finally see a climactic battle that may not be all flashy Crouching Tiger, but becomes more thrilling because we understand what that fight means to both of the combatants making it all the more exciting.

I was thoroughly (and surprisingly) entertained by every minute of The Count of Monte Cristo. My skepticism had reached a degree that not even John Nash or Will Hunting would be able to decipher, knowing that James (sometimes Jim) Caviezel was cast as the hero. Anyone familiar with my reviews, know my opinion on his acting prowess ranks somewhere between a switched-off replicant and a pet rock that’s been crushed. Early on in Monte Cristo, Caviezel didn’t do much to disprove my thoughts as he still has his deer-in-the-headlights moments (and I mean when an actual deer is IN your headlights after you hit him). However, Caviezel began to surprise me as his character evolved from the kind of gee whiz/duh mentality (that normally perfectly suits him) to the charming Count with an effortless quality that only really good actors can accomplish.

And speaking of good actors, matching Caviezel as the perfect counterpoint is Guy Pierce (quickly becoming one of my favorite actors). After roles in L.A. Confidential and last year’s best film, Memento, Pierce’s star will continue to rise to the level of a film lover’s household name with his villainous turn (and the upcoming remake of The Time Machine in March). Pierce plays the perfect scoundrel here, a man already born into wealth, who would rob, cheat and kill to get more behind your back and to your face and then still not know how to handle his success. All of this perfectly summed up in one simple line to Edmond when he says, “I’m not supposed to want to be you.” Pierce’s performance will recall Tim Roth’s lechery in another period revenge tale and, “Braveheart” notwithstanding, The Count of Monte Cristo may be the best film of its kind to come along since “Rob Roy” in 1995.

The ads may tell you to “prepare for adventure and count on revenge”, just don’t be fooled into expecting action and swordfights aplenty. There is excitement and several worthy crowd-pleasing moments, but they are the result of a long and great journey and not by expensive special effects and a cheap applause sign. Caviezel and Pierce make great opponents and are aided by a cavalcade of strong support, not the least of which from James Frain (as a shady politician) and Luis Guzman (marvelous as Edmond’s loyal sidekick). This gets 2002 its first great film of the year, so even if Sadler wasn’t correct in the vocalizing of Dumas’ name, Tim Robbins was right when he simply replied, “You’ll like it, it’s about a prison break.”

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 01/25/02 12:37:23
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

12/17/18 Ajpwales Good movie well told simple tale. 4 stars
4/24/12 dsfasasd klsadf jsadf jas df jasdf ;j asd f Great book terrible movie 4 stars
2/28/11 brian EVERYTHING worth seeing a movie for. 5 stars
7/28/10 the dork knight Too much swashbuckling. Ignores the real MEAT of the story 3 stars
8/15/09 zaira it's really a nice movie, it reminds us that "jesus will give us the just justice!" 5 stars
12/08/08 Joshua it is nice and good movie 4 stars
7/18/07 johnnyfog Great first half, awesome cast. Gets pretty dull by the end though... 4 stars
5/22/06 R.W.Welch Good production of the old revenge yarn tho it lacks the dash of the 30's version. 4 stars
2/07/06 Paul Horine Nice design and acting 5 stars
8/12/05 ES This is probably the best telling of one of the best stories ever told= awesome 5 stars
3/29/05 tatum Big, grand, old fashioned film entertainment 5 stars
2/25/05 ALDO Enjoyed it heaps... 5 stars
1/13/05 victor hernandez the muvie is greate and I recomendet to enibody 5 stars
11/17/04 ? <('o'<) (^'o'^) (>'o')> 5 stars
7/18/04 Jason J Lynch A fine classic that's not outdated nor too updated. 5 stars
6/21/04 Rock Hound Not as good as the CLASSICS ILLUSTRATED version (c. 1964?). Was that balloon in the book? 3 stars
1/02/03 The Freshmaker Pales in comparison to the Richard Chamberlain version for TV... 2 stars
11/06/02 Bob Vloon A simplistic version of Dumas' great story. Read the book. 2 stars
9/27/02 John McNew Smart, fun, but ultimately predictable and tiresome after the first hour and a half 3 stars
9/15/02 syrius kicks ass 5 stars
5/25/02 Pearce is the sexiest man alive... grrrrrr ;-) 4 stars
5/24/02 Marcia Lartz Superb and tense thriller. Well acted and with good scene design. 5 stars
3/24/02 Lala It's like the Tom Cruise Mission Impossible movies; it's great, just change the title. 4 stars
2/18/02 Nuse090 it was all i ever wanted from a hollywood movie 5 stars
2/17/02 AgentDS It's a feast for the eyes its elegance. And a welcome departure from a cynical world. 4 stars
2/17/02 ToneCapone Really good movie. Entertains throughout. 4 stars
2/15/02 Kooler Gorgeous, swash-buckling good times. But what is with Guy Pearce's hair? 4 stars
2/12/02 seldom scene tremendous action and not preachy with beautiful settings 5 stars
2/11/02 ngacpro Sneaky good and very entertaining. 4 stars
2/09/02 Meryl Kopy Bleeeech. 2 stars
1/31/02 Zertaut Dopey simplification, and Caviezel is boring, but Guy's great and the girl is beautiful 3 stars
1/31/02 Solonor Rasreth Egad! How far can you stray from the original? Pretty far, it seems. 2 stars
1/30/02 Butterbean So what if the book wasn't followed. I liked this movie! 4 stars
1/29/02 Jesus Christ I condemn this movie. 2 stars
1/29/02 rogue James Caviezel has found new respect as an actor in my book 5 stars
1/28/02 Joe Too bad it's not eligible for 2001 oscars! Awesome 5 stars
1/28/02 Carter Very entertaining 5 stars
1/27/02 Titus Good fun, some funny bits, very enjoyable 4 stars
1/26/02 Brenda Awesomely entertaining. Go see it! 5 stars
1/26/02 bill excellent entertainment 5 stars
1/26/02 Gibbo Guy Pierce is just wonderful - an interesting story 4 stars
1/23/02 Buddy41 A good ride - good story - good acting - rcommended 4 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  25-Jan-2002 (PG-13)



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast