More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
4.5

Awesome72.41%
Worth A Look: 13.79%
Average: 8.62%
Pretty Bad: 1.72%
Total Crap: 3.45%

2 reviews, 46 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Raja Natwarlal by Jay Seaver

Search for Weng Weng, The by Jay Seaver

Creep (2014) by Jay Seaver

Kundo: Age of the Rampant by Jay Seaver

Guardian (2014) by Jay Seaver

As Above, So Below by Jay Seaver

November Man, The by Jay Seaver

Hana-Dama: The Origins by Jay Seaver

Creeping Garden, The by Jay Seaver

Seventh Code by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


12 Angry Men (1957)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by MP Bartley

"12 Men, One Room, All Talk, No Action...Who's In?"
5 stars

You've got to admit, as concepts go it's not exactly a grabber. Whereas when you could sum 'Phone Booth' up as 'one man gets pinned down in a phone booth by a sniper' that at least promises some action. '12 Angry Men' on the other hand could be summed up as '12 men debate the merits of a murder case' and doesn't sound particularly enthralling. Surprising then it's one of the finest thrillers Hollywood has ever offered.

It's a cheat to say that the action is confined to the one debating room. There are glimpses of the courtroom, the outside and the bathroom adjacent to the debating room. But everything else is in the summation. It's all chit-chat and no action.

Specifically, a young deliquent stands accused of murdering his father. It seems an open and shut case, with eyewitnesses, lack of believeable alibi and concrete evidence stacking up heavily against the boy. But when the 12 jurors (Henry Fonda, Ed Begley, Lee J. Cobb, Martin Balsam, Joseph Sweeney, Jack Warden among others) retire to deliberate it's not as straightforward as it seems. An initial verdict of 11 to 1 is returned in favour of guilty. Only juror 8, Fonda, is doubtful of the boys guilt and like a dog with a bone he's reluctant to let it go without a fight. Slowly others become swayed over to his argument while others like Cobb become increasingly irate and keen to see the boy fry in the chair.

What's first notable about '12 Angry Men' is that until the very end we never learn any characters names. They're simply identified by their juror number. But Roses's script masterfully distinguishes them from each other through subtle shades of characterisation. Fonda isn't entirely convinced the boy is innocent but neither is he convinced he's guilty, and this element of doubt is what is nagging away at him.

Others such as juror 10, Begley are irate at the idea of the boy going free, for reasons that later become clear. Juror 1 Balsam is the reluctant foreman having to take authority and keep the argument calm whereas he'd much rather take a backseat to the case and simply cast his vote. This depth of characterisation runs throughout the cast and they all elevate themselves superbly to the task. No-one is coloured black or white here, they're all seen in shades of grey with their own motives and reasons for belief in the case. It's even more notable considering that the majority of the cast were just known for their tv work and it was for the majority, their biggest film role at the time. The real characters behind the argument are slowly revealed whether it be through subtle hints in the conversation between the men at times of calm or whether it is through the bluster or conviction of their arguments.
One moment where one juror is revealed as nothing more than just a yelling racist bully and slowly turns the rest of the group against him, before being told to sit down and shut up by someone previously on his side is a masterful moment.

So with a great script and terrific on-screen presence it would take a lot for Sidney Lumet to screw it up. And he doesn't thankfully. It's almost a thankless task for a director to take on a film set for 99% of its time in one room, but he approaches it with a steady hand and intelligence. He realises the tight premise of the movie and doesn't over-egg the film with unneccesary stylistic tricks. The only one he does use is one that you'll never realise, as he actually shrinks the set by moving the walls closer in as the arguments progress and the tension rises. It's imperceptible, but coupled with the idea of the day getting hotter and the men getting sweatier as the debate rages, it soaks the film in an almost tangible heat. He also demonstrates great editing choices. A hack would simply cut away between characters like there's no tomorrow, but Lumet knows precisely how to frame every angle of the room, how to manouvere around it and when he jumps into extreme close-ups of the jurors, it's a superb moment of skill. And at a lean hour and a half it's much more exciting and involving than flabby knock-offs like 'A Time To Kill' or 'A Few Good Men'.


Ultimately though, '12 Angry Men' paints itself into a corner. It knows it's got to persuade 11 certain men of the boys innocence and that for them to be so certain it's got to seem a watertight case. So when Fonda starts to blow holes in the case, it does seem unlikely, particularly when he starts showing investigative skills Humphrey Bogart would have been proud of. This sudden burst of sleuthing also spreads to other jurors, late in the day, where miniscule details are gleefully seized upon like no-one else has thought of them. But if in cold analysis the details don't bear too close scrutiny, the passion with which they're argued and the skill that Lumet and Rose weave around the details to focus on personal prejudice instead, it's certainly forgiveable. What could have been hokey and come across as a sham, instead comes across as sometimes unlikely but always inspired.

It would also be easy to dismiss '12 Angry Men' as a liberals wet-dream. We could all hope that when a jury retires to consider its verdict, they argue with as much intelligence and clarity as Fonda does here. We could all hope that the prejudice of others such as Cobb are kept out, but it's sadly unlikely. Instead we're left with what could be seen as wish-fulfillment, but also as an exemplary study in characterisation, Hollywood at its best, and the sheer excitement of some of the best talents at the time coming together,

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=5803&reviewer=293
originally posted: 07/14/03 23:33:53
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

3/14/13 Ionicera one of the best films of the 1950s 5 stars
7/24/12 Brennan With all due respect to Casablanca, possibly the most perfect film of the 20th Century. 5 stars
4/04/12 David Hollingsworth Tense, Claustrophobic, and Superb 5 stars
2/15/12 stanley welles courtroom tour-de-force 5 stars
1/16/12 John Outstanding and unique drama 5 stars
9/28/11 C.M. Chan Excellent drama, excellent civics lesson 5 stars
7/23/10 RLan A terrific drama and a must see for those who like movies about the law! 5 stars
6/13/08 PAUL SHORTT BRILLIANT DRAMA WHICH PUTS ACROSS AN IMPORTANT ANTI-RACIST MESSAGE 5 stars
1/28/08 proper amateur film critic A masterful work of debate and dialogue. One of the best films ever made 5 stars
1/24/08 Double M *This Space Is Not Enough to Do This Movie Any Justice*. Just try to learn anything from it 5 stars
5/28/07 R.W. Welch Adept writing and sturdy cast pull off something of a tour de force. 4 stars
5/13/07 jem the death penalty is an awesome responsibility! 5 stars
3/06/07 action movie fan tense thriller like atmosphere set in jury room-great dialouge 5 stars
2/15/07 Monday Morning You will love this excellent film if your IQ is anywhere over room temperature. Otherwise.. 5 stars
1/09/07 Anai Arias I LOVED IT!!! Its really a graet film! 4 stars
11/13/06 aishani great 4 stars
5/27/06 Lasse Poulsen Truly a Classic film. So small and yet so massive. You've got to love it. 5 stars
4/04/06 John Aster Habig Dialogue Character Study That's All A Great Drama Needs 5 stars
12/07/05 GaGaGman it was pretty good 4 stars
12/01/05 cynthia martinez it was alright..... 3 stars
11/28/05 Hans Voerknecht This movie is so unbelievable good 5 stars
6/17/05 Smitty Up against Bridge on the River Kwai, another of those gems that never won an oscar. 5 stars
5/03/05 Dit Beedee Wondeful! I wrote a research paper about this one. No action but amazingly intriguing. 5 stars
3/06/05 Charles Hemmingway Extremely good! loved every minute of it! 5 stars
12/22/04 Michael O'Connor Classic Cinema! One small set = One great film! 5 stars
12/10/04 Gonçalo Mendes da Maia One of a kind; the best of Lumet's movies 5 stars
9/27/04 alicia a classic! 5 stars
8/24/04 watever it was boring and annoying and got me restless 3 stars
7/27/04 mandish fundooo ... i hate senti serious stuff .. but this was cool .. kept me totally engrossed 5 stars
7/20/04 Sam It was ok but it gets a lil confusing 4 stars
7/20/04 Trubby It was an okay film some parts were really boring 3 stars
7/18/04 Richard not to be missed 5 stars
5/18/04 Kitina Blues I watched it in English class too, u know, and i was the only one who liked it!!!! 5 stars
5/11/04 Denise Duspiva slow 3 stars
4/15/04 Phe It was okay but I wish it would have been in color! 4 stars
4/03/04 john simply one of the best dramatic movies ever made 5 stars
3/05/04 Courtney you have to have a love for the court scene, if not you will not understand the film 3 stars
2/04/04 glenn george menor it's pretty dragging...a lot of talking happened.defeats the objective of movie making. 2 stars
12/10/03 Tim Wahl Exact reality of small group communications 4 stars
10/17/03 Josh Standlee I was forced to watch this crap in my English class! I hate this movie! 1 stars
9/09/03 Susan Orellana It is is my top 5 4 stars
8/22/03 EM EY ELLE Very well done, captivating throughout the entire film 5 stars
7/22/03 Ahnold One of the best 5 stars
7/17/03 Jon Lyrik Fantastic. 5 stars
4/25/02 Just a College Student..... i hate black and white films!! i am a child of the 80s and grew up w/ color tv 1 stars
3/15/02 Monster W. Kung Fantastic. One of the best classics. 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  02-Mar-1957

UK
  N/A

Australia
  02-Feb-1958 (G)


Directed by
  Sidney Lumet

Written by
  Reginald Rose

Cast
  Henry Fonda
  Martin Balsam
  Jack Warden
  Jack Klugman
  Lee J. Cobb
  E.J. Marshall



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2014, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast