More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.43

Awesome54.05%
Worth A Look: 5.41%
Average: 2.7%
Pretty Bad: 5.41%
Total Crap: 32.43%

1 review, 31 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Fortress, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

Death Note: Light Up the New World by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Long Time Dead
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Andrew Howe

"The best of British? Not on your life."
1 stars

If I asked you to name three genres commonly associated with the British film industry, you’d probably mention gritty drama, quirky comedy or the type of sweeping historical epic favoured by the late great David Lean. Four decades of tradition wasn’t good enough for Marcus Adams, however – he wanted to emulate his Hollywood idols, so he created a schlock horror film that wouldn’t be out of place amongst Urban Legend and any Nightmare on Elm Street that wasn’t directed by Wes Craven. That should be enough to convince most of you to give it a wide berth, but if you require further evidence feel free to join me while I spend a few hundred words treating the film with precisely as much respect as it deserves.

Here’s the drill: eight guys and gals head over to the local nightclub for an evening of dancing, drugs and high-spirited horseplay. Once the E kicks in you’d assume they’d retire to their chambers to do what comes naturally to teenagers sporting excessive levels of hormones, but for reasons which are never entirely credible they retire to a disused back room to play with a Ouija board instead. Before you can say “bad trips all round” they’ve summoned a Djinn, whose message from beyond the grave is that they’re all going to die. It’s not attempting to start a philosophical debate about mortality, of course – the implication seems to be that they’re all going to die soon, a prophecy it spends the better part of the film fulfilling. Cue running, screaming and crimson splatter all round, with the usual cheap shocks, red herrings and nausea-inducing camera angles thrown in for good measure.

It appears to have taken no less than six people to script this exercise in originality, and while Adams and James Gay-Rees are taking the lion’s share of the credit I imagine the contribution of Chris Baker and Andy Day should not be underestimated (interested parties may refer to my Mean Machine review for pertinent comments on their scriptwriting prowess). It’s not impossible to do this kind of thing well, but they should have spent less time congratulating themselves on securing finance and more on studying Everything I Needed to Know About the Horror Genre I Learned from Wes Craven’s “Shocker” , which would have provided them with the following erudite advice:

Know Thine Enemy

Shocker’s chief slicer and dicer was a paragon of malevolence - possessed of equal parts animal cunning and twisted sadism, he’s the kind of villain whose leering face looms large in many a sweat-soaked nightmare (except when he steps aside for Freddy Krueger, about whom no more needs be said). Long Time Dead, on the other hand, offers a mute, largely unseen vengeful spirit that possesses exactly as much personality as mute, largely unseen vengeful spirits generally exhibit.

This, of course, is brought to you from the Friday the 13th school of filmmaking, which stipulates that strong silent types make for the most unnerving hatchet men. That’s fine if you’ve got arms, legs and a mask, but incorporeal beings need moonlit woods, cutting-edge special effects and Bruce Campbell as a foil, none of which feature in Adams’s latest opus.

See You in the Next Life

OK, it’s a horror film, so somebody has to cop it sweet. The problem with most slasher flicks is that it’s impossible to become invested in the characters’ fates, since they’re either despicable cretins or marked for death from an early stage, leaving the manner of their demise as the only variable in the equation.

Shocker turned this on its head by presenting us with a likeable, intelligent protagonist whose continued survival was a cause for concern, and moreover certain characters who seemed destined for an early exit actually made it to the closing credits. In Long Time Dead’s defence, the lead players are a likeable crew, but by the halfway point it’s apparent they’ve been recruited from the local purveyor of all-purpose fodder (just add grievous bodily harm). The entire character roster start falling like ninepins, with nary a finger raised in their own defence, and most of the actual death sequences are anticlimactic and unusually restrained.

Innovation is not a Dirty Word

Shocker represented Craven’s finest hour as a scriptwriter – it fools you into believing it’s a standard serial killer flick, segues into some interesting (if not entirely original) territory about a third of the way through, then launches itself into left field for a truly bizarre climax (I might add that it’s one of the only modern horror films that doesn’t leave the door open for a sequel, which automatically earns it a measure of respect).

Long Time Dead, on the other hand, is concerned with nothing more than uninspired bloodletting. Watching people run, scream and die is not particularly interesting – you need a storyline that picks up steam as the protagonists develop a plan to deal with the situation, with every character doing their bit to bring down the phantom menace. If the scriptwriters had a brain between them they would have allowed the characters to band together and behave in an intelligent fashion (see Final Destination and Nightmare on Elm Street 3 for examples of what I’m talking about), but in Long Time Dead they just wander around trying to work out what’s going on, and then they die. Special mention must also be made of the climactic showdown, which is one of limpest, stupidest and most derivative conclusions to an occult thriller I’ve ever witnessed.

Did someone mention atmosphere? The failure of the creative team to make use of the British locations is the final nail in the coffin – if it wasn’t for the accents you’d be hard pressed to tell it’s set in Blighty, which is ridiculous when you consider it’s the land of standing stones, mist-shrouded moors and unnerving rural types who can dispense warnings of impending doom with greater authority than anyone else on the planet. John Landis did all this and more with An American Werewolf in London, but since Long Time Dead already cribs from the worst examples of the genre I suspect the generic location work is simply the result of Adams not having sufficient funds to drag the entire crew out to the countryside for a shoot (having already spent most of it on his top-notch scriptwriting team and whatever backyard boys he chose to concoct the garden-variety special effects).

Look, it’s like this: there’s only one Wes Craven, and even he’s capable of the occasional misstep (any Scream with a numeral in the title is a good place to start). However, there are hundreds of unemployed scriptwriters who could have devised a more intelligent narrative than the one Adams and his cronies cooked up (and don’t you believe for a second they don’t know it), so I can only hope that public indifference to their self-proclaimed talents returns them to the dole queue post haste.

Long Time Dead? Not nearly long enough, and like anything that’s exhumed it’s the worse for wear and tear. Adams and his cronies have given us the least palatable British export since Mad Cow Disease, so do your bit for cross-border protection and avoid it like the plague.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=5892&reviewer=193
originally posted: 04/17/02 20:35:21
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

9/03/08 kirrily wow this movie was sooo kool i saw it ages ago but i still watch it to get a fright it is p 5 stars
8/13/07 sukrat karim 5 stars
11/02/04 mark stoggall the problem with the film is none of the characters are memorable with the possible excepti 2 stars
9/14/03 Gary It's okay, but.... 3 stars
9/11/03 Rod Pretty bad actaully 2 stars
8/27/03 Joey This movie sucked!! dog soldiers is much better than this crap 1 stars
7/12/03 Joe COOL 5 stars
6/30/03 Leslie Taylor Better than anything from the US - not hard! 4 stars
5/23/03 Betty ***** 5 stars
5/23/03 Paulie I thought it was great. Better than Soul Survivors anyway 5 stars
5/20/03 Spence Awsome movie 5 stars
5/20/03 Mr Blue Ten out of ten 5 stars
5/18/03 phil Man this movie rocked 5 stars
3/03/03 Tiffany Fucken Wicked Mate 5 stars
11/22/02 vergey stéphane it's fucking great!!! 5 stars
10/23/02 VDV® It Really, REALLY sucks big time 1 stars
9/17/02 Jack Jarvis Sit through this film and you'll wish you were dead. Avoid! 1 stars
9/11/02 idris super film 5 stars
9/09/02 funkylamb What is wrong with you people? This movie is truly awful, a crib for what 'not' to do... 1 stars
8/23/02 ozgen the film was awesome i really like it besides JOE ABSOLOM is one of the cutiest guys i ve e 5 stars
8/16/02 M.karpagham This is the best and scariest movie i have ever seen in my life. 5 stars
8/14/02 tina i loved it and lukas haas is gorgous i did't want him to die 4th and marsha thomason(lucy) 5 stars
8/07/02 ali ali 1 stars
7/28/02 DerbyMadlad This film rocks 5 stars
7/21/02 JASON GRIFFITHS ABSOLUTLEY FANTASTIC 5 stars
7/20/02 ! This one is okay, worth a look! 4 stars
7/11/02 Vivek Pillai Absolutely Brilliant-much better and scarier than all the American horror films I have seen 5 stars
7/10/02 Paul Wikkid Film - Watch it 5 stars
7/02/02 A. Landau Night Lara Belmont! 5 stars
5/01/02 Max Younger The film was very good ( i am her brouther) 5 stars
4/26/02 Ian Waldron-Mantgani, http://www.ukcritic.com Yup, it was drivel. 'Nuff said. 1 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  02-May-2002

UK
  N/A

Australia
  05-Sep-2002




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast