More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.27

Awesome: 20%
Worth A Look: 6.67%
Average: 6.67%
Pretty Bad: 13.33%
Total Crap53.33%

1 review, 9 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Hal by Jay Seaver

I, Origins by Greg Ursic

Boyhood by Daniel Kelly

Uzumasa Limelight by Jay Seaver

Goal of the Dead by Jay Seaver

Yasmine by Jay Seaver

Mr. Go by Jay Seaver

Hercules (2014) by Brett Gallman

Wish I Was Here by Jaycie

Predestination by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


American Psycho 2: All American Girl
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Rob Gonsalves

"This doesn't exist if I pretend hard enough."
1 stars

An execrable, in-name-only "sequel" to the excellent 2000 adaptation of Bret Easton Ellis' controversial novel.

And what did Bret have to say about this "sequel"?

"If they're not careful," he sighed when the project was first announced, "they could end up with something like the Pink Panther movies." Besides, Ellis had already written his own follow-up an "email show" to coincide with the first film's release. Curious parties may visit http://www.briankotek.com/psycho/movie/am2000.cfm to read the archived AmPsych2000. It's pretty interesting for fans of the original book/movie -- it includes Patrick Bateman's email therapy sessions, and ends with Bateman watching a prankishly recognizable in-flight movie.

And I'll bet Ellis' follow-up kicks the shit out of this one.

American Psycho 2 wasn't even supposed to be an American Psycho sequel, for Christ's sake! Lions Gate noticed that the first film got critical acclaim and didn't do too poorly in theaters, so they dusted off an unrelated script and modified it to link it (tenuously) to the first film. Thus, a story about Rachael (Mila Kunis), a homicidally driven college student who eliminates her competition for a coveted teaching-assistant spot, now begins with a flashback to her childhood run-in with Patrick Bateman (played here by somebody named Michael Kremko, in a blue face-mask). As many commentators have pointed out, this neatly invalidates the reading of the original film's being mostly the diseased fantasy of one P. Bateman, and not reality. Here, he is a killer and he does slice up Rachael's babysitter and Rachael does (improbably) end his reign of terror. So Ellis' unforgettable creation is rewarded by being ice-picked by an adolescent girl. Terrific.

What did Morgan J. Freeman -- unrelated to the penguin-narrating actor, but the former indie director of Hurricane Streets and Desert Blue -- have to say about his involvement with this cinematic abortion?

Plenty of stupid stuff, as told to Sarah Kendzior in Fangoria #212. Among Freeman's more inane remarks showing that he really didn't understand Mary Harron's film:

- "I didn't hate the first movie, but I didn't like it. It bugged the shit out of me, the way it drowned itself in '80s pop culture."

- "I didn't see how the first movie was a feminist movie. It just seemed like it was Bateman's wet dream."

- "I think the people who really like the [first] movie seem to be those guys who are really into the fonts on their business cards."

- On Ellis' comments on the "sequel": "If Ellis is drunk at parties and talks shit, that's fine....But if I could fight him, I'd love to kick his ass."

- On his own movie: "It's not, like, a satire of American culture, and it's not going to be a commentary on psychosis or anything. This is about a hot, sexy superhero who's sort of the anti-Clarice Starling."

Sounds like he didn't really want to make a sequel at all.

He didn't. Freeman was actually as exasperated as anyone that Lions Gate marketed this as a sequel instead of as its own movie. Still, he didn't have to bash a markedly superior film in order to talk up his own film, and if he was going to play all holier-than-thou, it would've been nice if his film were any good either as a sequel or as its own movie.

Do you have any room left to discuss the movie?

I think so. Consciously cast against type, Mila Kunis (of That '70s Show) comes off merely bratty and annoying. The only other readily recognizable name in the cast, William Shatner, embarrasses himself mightily as the professor whose approval Rachael seeks. For a while, the movie toys with the possibility that someone else is the killer, but then the script just matter-of-factly shows Rachael going to work on her next victim. The movie is neither frightening nor funny; in fact, it's extremely boring even considering its 88-minute length, I still had to get up for two or three pause breaks just to get through the damn thing. Ironically, when I first heard about this project, I thought, "This could either be terrible or brilliant." A distaff American Psycho if written and acted as sharply and perceptively as the original, it could rock the house. Unfortunately, this is quite literally just a slasher movie with the unearned American Psycho label slapped onto it to move more units.

Think there'll be an American Psycho 3?

Christ, I hope not. What are they gonna do next, take a dusty old script about a schoolteacher working with deaf Harlem kids and work Patrick Bateman into that film's backstory somehow?

Whatever franchise they were hoping to start up, thank God (or whoever's listening) that it appears to be dead. Maybe Lions Gate will make "Crash 2" or something.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=6542&reviewer=416
originally posted: 05/20/06 13:02:51
[printer] printer-friendly format  
For more in the Direct To Video Sequels series, click here.

User Comments

8/20/09 marcyite This is a great little film; it has more layers to it than initially meets the eye... 4 stars
6/22/08 David Wtf were they thinking? 1 stars
10/15/07 fools♫gold Whatever. 2 stars
5/15/04 nightman Most of the jerks from my college experience get it 5 stars
2/13/04 tatum Bad idea, just another straight to video slasher flick 1 stars
6/23/03 Hottie i loved it better then the first one 5 stars
6/19/03 Chris COOL MOVIE 5 stars
4/11/03 Rastabub Dumb, but Mila Kunis looks great and there is a kind of campy fun to it 3 stars
3/16/03 .Choadushouse. Horrible. Mila Kunis makes this feel like a teen movie. And the killings are WEAK. 2 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  18-Jun-2002 (R)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2014, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast