Overall Rating
  Awesome: 28%
Worth A Look: 28%
Average: 16%
Pretty Bad: 15%
Total Crap: 13%
6 reviews, 64 user ratings
|
|
| How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days |
by Erik Childress
"I “Bet” That This “Romantic” Movie Is a Hit. But Who Loses?"
|
Hey everyone, it’s February. That’s part of the first quarter of the year. And we all know what THAT means, don’t we? It’s time for Hollywood’s annual “romantic bet movie.” You know the ones and you’ve loved them all. Last year we had the “hold your wad” bet of 40 Days and 40 Nights. 2000 & 2001 had the diabolical “deal bets” of Whatever It Takes and Tomcats. And in 1999 we had the teenage triple threat of She’s All That, Cruel Intentions and 10 Things I Hate About You. What’s more romantic than putting two attractive leads through the ringer for 90 minutes before their misconduct is discovered 15 minutes before the inevitable reconciliation? Better yet, what’s more insulting than to keep expecting audiences to buy this same plot over and over and over again?How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days nearly accomplishes a neat trick. It teeters incredibly close to actually putting the viewer into the mindframe of the plot. Not the characters, but the situations they create for us. Early on I was hating the film, despising all the participants involved for dog paddling through the same cliches and acting unlike any human being you’ve ever met. Then it started to get amusing, like a marathon runner dogging it before sprinting towards triumphance. Then I started to like the two leads, finding them charming and doing their best with limited material. Then came the 91st minute when nothing was different. Nothing was going to change. This was the same old script with the names changed to protect the innocent.
Amazing how as the years go by, these characters are getting older, and at the same time, less mature. Andie Anderson (Kate Hudson) writes for one of those New York women’s magazines whose probing journalism usually includes topics like “why men suck” and “why can’t they suck in the right places.” Andie would rather be writing columns on politics and things that matter, but would we trust such a writer who can’t even understand why a magazine like this doesn’t print such scoops? Does anyone read Cosmo for thoughts on Bush? (The president, I mean.)
In covering for her relationship-challenged co-worker, Andie pitches the titular piece to her demanding boss (Bebe Neuwirth). She’ll pick a man, date him for ten days and use every faux pas imaginable to drive the poor shlub away. (The article is due in 11.) Just so she’s not the only morally-challenged individual, the poor shlub, Benjamin Barry (Matthew McConaughey), is also betting his way into an advertising account by claiming he can get any woman to fall in love with him…in whaddya know, 10 Days. The conniving are-they-lesbians-or-not competitors (Michael Michele & Shalom Harlow) conveniently aware of Andie’s mission, point her out to him.
Any creative writer worth their salt-and-pepper wouldn’t have to do field work on this type of column and despite the script telling us that Andie is a great writer in a position that doesn’t deserve her, there still has to be a movie to see. Andie and Ben hit it off as it’s imperative, so beginning the cliché counter for both sexes. Men love sports. Women are clingy. Guys hate chick flicks. Chicks will take a diamond over love anyday. (“A woman in lust wants chocolates. A woman in love wants diamonds.”) Nice message. Don’t jump down my throat. This is all in the movie. Now, in some respects, this isn’t far from the truth, but everyone knows there’s so much more that goes into why relationships do-and-don’t work. The writers here still have no more sense than to go for just the easy shots.
Surprisingly, that’s when the film starts to develop some genuine laughs as the culmination of all this craziness begins to affect Ben, as it does us. McConaughey is a great sport to play up the gags with a self-effacing mock to his own level of guyness, proving how his moviestar charisma would best suit him in a really solid screenplay. A scene at couple’s counciling (6 days into the relationship) works wonders thanks to him and Hudson, not the script. These are two charming actors with obvious chemistry, who even nearly overcome the inevitable revelations in songform, but are wasted by not being given the chance to go the distance.
Plots like this only work in screwball comedy where the action moves fast, the dialogue crackles with wit and every character is an over-the-top parody. Here it’s only a plot and the characters aren’t witty or fast enough to come off as nothing more than one-dimensional stereotypes. Of all the presences surrounding the overriding likability factor of Hudson and McConaughey, only Adam Goldberg seems able to elevate himself with a series of off-the-cuff one-liners that smack of improvisation and not hack writers. (The Snickers pitchman isn’t nearly as successful.)To say that this film is slightly better than mediocre means that its going to be a big hit. Director Donald Petrie (Miss Congeniality) will continue to get the call making slightly amusing audience pleasers and writers looking for a quick buck will have no qualms about churning out the next “bet” gimmick. The fact that these ideas getting skewered in Not Another Teen Movie weren’t more appreciated puts the blame at another’s door. Look forward to future screenplays: (1) A woman is bet she can’t get a man to marry her during the week of her menstrual cycle. (2) A man is bet he can’t fall in love given a selection of 25 women on a reality game show. Oh wait. How about (3) A man and woman are bet they can’t fall in love with an unattractive person with a great sense of humor. If How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days turns out to be a $75 million hit as I suspect, then it will no longer matter if the same script is dusted off and the names changed to protect the innocent, because it’s the audiences that are guilty.
link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=7005&reviewer=198
originally posted: 02/07/03 16:59:23
![[printer]](/images/icon/printer.gif) printer-friendly format
|
 |
USA
07-Feb-2003 (PG-13)
UK
N/A
Australia
24-Apr-2003
|
|
Articles 
subscribe to this feed![[AllPosters.com]](/images/icon/ap.gif){kind=icon}
