More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.62

Awesome: 26.09%
Worth A Look31.88%
Average: 26.09%
Pretty Bad: 10.14%
Total Crap: 5.8%

5 reviews, 39 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Loving Vincent by Jay Seaver

Fortress, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Shanghai Knights
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"A creative and giddy sequel."
4 stars

The last thing on the agenda for "Shanghai Knights" is to do anything its predecessor, "Shanghai Noon" (2000), didn't already do. More scenes of Owen Wilson being anachronistically sardonic while Jackie Chan has entertaining fights with bad guys -- that's what we want to see.

"Shanghai Knights" delivers that, with an additional bit of creativity most sequels would skip: It offers homages to many classic films, particularly the slapstick films of the silent era. No attempt is made to pass Wilson and Chan off as another Laurel and Hardy or anything like that, but several situations they find themselves in resemble moments that will be pleasantly familiar to film buffs. (From the non-silent era, there is even a graceful, whimsically choreographed fight scene involving an umbrella, set to "Singin' in the Rain.")

I appreciate the extra effort in these nods to the great films of yesteryear, whether they add anything to the current story or not. "Shanghai Knights" is defined by that philosophy: You appreciate what it's doing, you chuckle quite a few times, and you're amused by its Chan-centric fight sequences. Is any of it new, and does any of it matter? No.

The film's thin plot has Old West sheriff Chon Wang (Chan) reuniting with his old buddy Roy O'Bannon (Wilson), an incompetent, contemplative, high-living would-be gunfighter, to pursue the man who killed Chon's father and made off with the Imperial Seal. They've tracked him to London, which is really just an excuse to get both of the fish out of water again, fighting with bobbies and befriending Dickensian street urchins.

Chon's sister, Lin (Fann Wong), is in England, too, and the butt-kicking genes apparently ran strong in the Chon family. She flits in and out of the story as plot developments require; most of the film, in fact, is as casual as Owen Wilson's delivery. Note the film's setting of 1887, yet our heroes encounter a young Charlie Chaplin (who was born in 1889), see front-page headlines about Jack the Ripper (who wasn't a full-blown serial killer until 1888), and sail past a Statue of Liberty still under construction (even though it was dedicated in 1886).

I confirmed these facts after just 60 seconds of Internet searching, and if this were any other movie, I would complain about the screenwriters' laziness. In this case, though, I think it's beside the point. History gets rewritten, facts are messed with, the dialogue is peppered with 20th century slang ("This country blows," Roy says) -- the matter at hand is that Wilson and Chan are funny together, Chan's fights are as spectacular as ever, and Wilson gets to say things like, "I'm a 30-year-old waiter/gigolo. Where's the future in that?"

Like the first film, this one finds legitimate chemistry between its mismatched stars, using their particular strengths and weaknesses against each other. One is verbally eloquent, one can barely speak English. One's an amazingly gifted fighter, the other looks like his nose has been broken too many times. Wilson and Chan make sense together in a movie, and this one wisely keeps them together for most of the longish running time. It's an easy-going lark; who doesn't enjoy one of those?

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=7006&reviewer=247
originally posted: 07/06/03 19:39:40
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

11/14/15 Ionicera 2 stars for the movie + 1 extra for Aidan Gillen 3 stars
10/31/08 Shaun Wallner Thought this was a good film. 4 stars
5/26/08 PAUL SHORTT DESPERATELY UNFUNNY ACTION/COMEDY MIRTHLESS NOT ONLY FOR ITS AUDIENCE BUT IN ITS WHOLE AURA 1 stars
7/04/06 Ashley Hinz Better than Shanghai Noon. 5 stars
7/28/05 Quigley the plot was bad, but the action and wilson's humor redeemed it. gotta see this movie 5 stars
7/16/05 tony Better than the first one. But still had flaws 3 stars
1/24/05 keithers.. Fun...but Chan Fans would be let down 3 stars
9/19/04 nicole alright 5 stars
5/09/04 reuben jay martin A lot of action 5 stars
4/13/04 Daniel Lowe A hilarious movie with a tonne of action, it is my al time favourite movie. 5 stars
1/29/04 stuntman A very fun film to watch 4 stars
1/01/04 Punk_Ass I was very suprised by this movie. Much better than the first. Really a fun movie 4 stars
11/26/03 jason fchan fucking great 5 stars
11/21/03 rony i was kind of let down by the plot and story, but the action sequences were great. 4 stars
9/08/03 Lauren Duggan It's a awesome movie 5 stars
8/12/03 tricia I loved it 5 stars
5/29/03 Blong It was Awesome 5 stars
4/30/03 Valerie Cameron Plot thickens when some silly boob lets them into secret room! 5 stars
4/22/03 Eloise shame HBS offers no rating lower than 1 Star. 1 stars
4/21/03 jackie chunny i too studied years in film so i must know alot,this movie rocks you pussys 5 stars
4/21/03 eddy mc murphie fucking awsome,i am a critic and could not fault this wonderful chan masterpeice 5 stars
4/13/03 Max Coakley Good 4 stars
3/20/03 Cameron Slick A silly, anachronistic mess, but the pairing of Chan and Wilson makes the movie fun. 4 stars
3/13/03 Roy Smith truth :the plot is.. pathetic, but the action and jokes are fun 4 stars
3/07/03 nick2k it was actually a fun movie. i think jackie and owen got a WORKING formula going. wheee! 4 stars
2/17/03 Suzz fun Jackie Chan film as usual 4 stars
2/17/03 stuntman one wacky adventure!! 5 stars
2/16/03 123 the plot is.. pathetic, but the action and jokes are fun 5 stars
2/12/03 KingNeutron Lots of fun, esp if you're a M.A. fan. 5 stars
2/12/03 Brian One-liners that are funny, JC fights, and they added a chick (hmm.. Rush Hour 2?). Decent. 3 stars
2/12/03 bob leather jacket Surprisingly enjoyable, hilarious and fun to watch 5 stars
2/11/03 Ubu the Ripper Not As Good As "Noon". Wait for the DVD 3 stars
2/10/03 scooby anything with jackie chan rules! 5 stars
2/10/03 Yo Mama! Not as bad as the rest make it out to be...good laughs, although a bit predictable. 4 stars
2/10/03 Darth Cunnilingus Lots of laughs, Jackie Chan delivers another winner. 5 stars
2/09/03 Large Farve Please..... make it stop...... 1 stars
2/08/03 Titus Some fun sequences, but generally not nearly as good as the first. 3 stars
2/08/03 George Jung Fuck me for watching this, fuck me up my stupid ass. 1 stars
2/08/03 Rob Just bad...honestly 2 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  07-Feb-2003 (PG-13)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  10-Apr-2003


Directed by
  David Dobkin

Written by
  Alfred Gough
  Miles Millar

Cast
  Jackie Chan
  Owen Wilson
  Fann Wong
  Donnie Yen
  Tom Fisher
  Aidan Gillen



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast