More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.36

Awesome: 16%
Worth A Look: 20%
Average56%
Pretty Bad: 0%
Total Crap: 8%

2 reviews, 13 user ratings


Latest Reviews

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

Death Note: Light Up the New World by Jay Seaver

Brawl in Cell Block 99 by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed


In-Laws, The (2003)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"Mediocre stuff, plus Albert Brooks, who deserves better."
3 stars

I hope Albert Brooks is happy knowing that when he appears in mediocre films like "The In-Laws," he is coming off as the brightest spot in them. Of course, he shines in good movies, too, but the light is even more radiant when all that surrounds him is dross.

I don't mean his co-stars. They are a charismatic bunch. Michael Douglas, as a rogue CIA agent whose son is about to marry Brooks' daughter, has his characteristic easy charm; Ryan Reynolds ("National Lampoon's Van Wilder") and Lindsay Sloane as the young couple are feisty and talented; Candace Bergen even shows up and earns a few chuckles as the CIA agent's bitter ex-wife. And Brooks, of course, has that soft, sarcastic whine that is both pleasing and amusing, like taking a warm bath with a clown, or something.

Their material, however, is second-rate. Based on the 1979 comedy, the rewritten screenplay by Nat Mauldin ("Dr. Dolittle") and Ed Solomon ("Charlie's Angels") offers the watered-down pablum that Hollywood cranks out by the fistful. Characters are forced into unlikely situations and then react unrealistically to them, eliminating any chance of humor.

And then there is Albert Brooks, who manages to rise above it and brings a few laughs. His understated delivery, his gentle neuroses, his expert comedy timing -- these are pivotal resources in any film, but especially one as weak as this. It is not reason enough to see it, really, but it's enough that if you are somehow forced into it, you will be able to survive. Brooks is a life preserver in a sea of C-grade belabored wackiness.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=7703&reviewer=247
originally posted: 06/05/03 16:55:58
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2003 Tribeca Film Festival. For more in the 2003 Tribeca Film Festival series, click here.

User Comments

11/19/06 Jack Sommersby Terrific star teamwork and agile direction make this nicely-written remake a pleasure. 4 stars
5/22/06 William Goss Surprisingly amusing, although not without feeling slightly guilty afterward 4 stars
5/22/06 Jeff Anderson An amusing, very funny & likable updating. Douglas & Brooks are great, that's what matters! 4 stars
12/06/05 R.W.Welch Cast is okay but material is not exactly inspired. 3 stars
9/26/05 Ben ALBERT BROOKS is always awesome.Everyone did a great job with what they had to work with. 4 stars
5/30/04 paul gunning good for a laugh 3 stars
2/10/04 Wesley Not going to win any awards, but for pure entertainment it's worth the money, HILARIOUS 4 stars
10/20/03 here I thought this was a GREAT movie and the actors did great also! 5 stars
7/25/03 May Q. Horney Among attempts at doing something different, here's one that actually works! 5 stars
7/13/03 Joe crap 1 stars
6/22/03 Hottie great funny film 5 stars
6/10/03 lazy sloppy movie Douglas and Brooks are charming, but the direction is pedestrian and the writing atrocious. 1 stars
6/05/03 lumjulx I thought it was very funny .. michael douglas definitely delivered a great performance.. 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  23-May-2003 (PG-13)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  28-Aug-2003




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast