More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
1

Awesome: 0%
Worth A Look: 0%
Average: 0%
Pretty Bad: 0%
Total Crap100%

1 review, 1 rating


Latest Reviews

Road Not Taken, The by Jay Seaver

Great Battle, The by Jay Seaver

True Fiction by Jay Seaver

Pick of the Litter by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Peter Sobczynski

House With A Clock In Its Walls, The by Peter Sobczynski

Life Itself (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

Unity of Heroes by Jay Seaver

Hanagatami by Jay Seaver

Predator, The by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Kiss, The (2003)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Greg Muskewitz

"Like getting tongue from a dog."
1 stars

Schmaltzy romance about an emaciated book editor who finds an old, incomplete transcript and hunts down the hermitic author for its proper dénouement.

For a festival that featured so many amateur movies, down to the quality in which they were filmed, Gorman Bechard’s movie has the look of professional worth with the added delusion of professional actors Terence Stamp, Illeana Douglas, and Billy Zane. (Sadly, Eliza Dushku is repeatedly proving she doesn’t fit in this category.) But the funds that buy technical polish can do nothing to buff out the rest of the major flaws. The romantic angle of the movie, related through meager blocks of the book’s text filmed in black-and-white, is melodramatic, cheesy, and unromantic. It’s a further slight and variation on the concept of Paris When It Sizzles (already massacred this year in Alex & Emma) whereby our large-mouthed, milky white and angular waif envisions herself and her ex-flame in the place of the novel’s protagonists. All around, not just the laughable excerpts, the dialogue is clunky, forced, artificial. The projected reality is eye-rollingly a fantasy, replete with teen-mentality adults, unrealistic work places, unswallowable situations, etc. Never ignoring its imposter status as a writer’s movie, it fails to connect as a movie at all — Bechard’s direction is empty, meaningless, blank, unsubstantiated. And at the risk of sounding sexist (or explaining the movie’s blatant sexism), perhaps the most direct reason behind the off-key portrayal of women is because it’s directed by a man who has no idea what he’s talking about.

[Not to be bothered with.]

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=8449&reviewer=172
originally posted: 12/29/03 09:54:51
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

1/21/05 Huge I agree - absolute crap. 1 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  14-Sep-2003

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast