More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.63

Awesome41.41%
Worth A Look: 14.14%
Average: 17.17%
Pretty Bad: 20.2%
Total Crap: 7.07%

6 reviews, 63 user ratings


Latest Reviews

I Have a Date with Spring by Jay Seaver

Halloween (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

All About Nina by Jay Seaver

Lost, Found by Jay Seaver

Night of the Living Dead (1968) by Rob Gonsalves

Neomanila by Jay Seaver

First Man by Peter Sobczynski

Bad Times At The El Royale by Peter Sobczynski

Being Natural by Jay Seaver

Suspiria (1978) by Rob Gonsalves

subscribe to this feed


Primer
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Robert Flaxman

"Prime entertainment."
5 stars

Though it clocks in at just 77 minutes, Primer contains more story, ideas, and intensity than many films twice its length. Itís a bit of a slow starter, yes, and itís pretty dense Ė and the way everything packs in like that makes a first viewing something of a head-scratcher. In truth, though, writer/director/star/Renaissance man Shane Carruth has made one of the best first efforts of all time.

There is certainly something to be said for a film thatís easy to understand. When it comes to science fiction, though, there often seems to be a clamoring for just the opposite. One need only look at the popularity of Donnie Darko, a film which cannot be fully comprehended without having the director explain it, to prove this. Primer has a similar impenetrability at first, but unlike Darko, all the details are there, and careful analysis of whatís given makes all the pieces fall into place.

The basic plot is this: Aaron (Carruth) and Abe (David Sullivan) are typical bored office workers who have started up a garage business with their friends making computer accessories. Meanwhile, the two of them are working secretly on another project. Whether they hit upon it accidentally at first or whether it was always the plan is unclear, but the upshot is that Aaron and Abe discover that they have invented a functioning time machine. After a couple refinements in the design, it is capable of transferring a person back in time.

As interesting a concept as time travel may be, merely featuring it does not make a film automatically good. As Roger Ebert is fond of saying, in slightly different words, the how of a movie is more important than the what. Fortunately for Carruth, the how of Primer is at least as interesting as its what Ė and possibly more so, since the what can be difficult to understand at many points during the film.

Indeed, much of Primer is really not about time travel at all. The plot is a conduit for Carruthís real intention, the desire to explore different aspects of human nature. The question is not what a time machine can do Ė itís what human beings choose to do when presented with one. The choices of Aaron and Abe are the crux of the film Ė the time machine is necessary for those choices to exist, but the examination of the choices themselves is more important than the device that created them.

To reveal the full extent of those choices would involve significant spoilers, however, so I will refrain. Suffice it to say that much of what is done with the machine is done without the knowledge of at least one of its creators. I wonít say what here because the film deserves to be seen unspoiled, although if you can grasp its every plot point the first time through without any exterior help, you deserve a medal. (I think I have the film down after one viewing, but Iíve been running it over in my head for a day and checking various theories posited in the forums on the filmís official website.)

The big selling point for Primer when it first came out was the filmís miniscule cost - $7,000, about level with the notoriously low-budget El Mariachi. Primer was shot on film but features no professional actors, a lot of donated props, and mostly opportune locations. Itís true, though Ė this sure doesnít look like a $7,000 movie. It may not feature any special effects in depicting its time travel, but if the word had instead been that it cost ďonly a couple million,Ē I doubt anyone would have blinked.

The acting is a bit rough, especially early in the film, where the attempts at overlapping dialogue Ė ďrehearsed improv,Ē as Carruth calls it on the DVDís directorís commentary track Ė donít especially work; the actors sound kind of unsure of themselves. After that, though, itís fine Ė the emotions are underplayed in places, but itís nothing that harms the work as a whole.

Even more beneficial to the film are its pace and tone. Primer starts in spare, more-Mamet-than-Mamet fashion, with its ambiguity where details are concerned and dialogue that manages to be simultaneously rapid-fire and vague. As things progress, however, the tension ratchets up even though the style never really gets any more ornate. The faster-paced confusion of the filmís middle third builds up a nervous energy that releases when the final third hits; the last portion works at explaining the rest of the film, though it takes a while to sink in. All told, the film manages to keep you on the edge of your seat even as youíre not entirely sure if you know whatís going on, an impressive achievement.

The questions Carruth raises are the most impressive achievement of Primer, though. Most science fiction films donít have much of a brain; that this is one of the smartest in years and comes from a first-time writer and director is really saying something. Perhaps thatís because the science fiction angle is more or less Carruthís secondary concern. I wonít lie Ė thereís plenty of clever time-travel plot here, which certainly was a big draw for me. Itís worth noting, though, that Carruth isnít too interested in convincing anyone that the box could really work. The few details given involve batteries and argon gas, which hardly tells us very much. Sure, pretty much any story involving time travel is going to have to invent a method, but Carruth barely even tries. The point here, however, is that he doesnít need to.

How the time travel works is unimportant. Carruthís characters react very differently to it, however, and evolve over the course of the film. Again, I take pains not to say very much about this, which makes praising it a tad difficult, but I feel safe in saying that the actions taken by the characters are as interesting as the time travel itself Ė and when you find time travel as interesting a concept as I do, thatís a big deal.

Primer is a little slow at first, but itís like a perpetual motion machine Ė once it starts going, it never stops. Not after the climax, not after the credits, not after itís been simmering in your head for days. Itís probably the most immediately addicting sci-fi film Iíve ever seen; with a compulsively watchable premise and a lot more to say about it than any other film would be expected to, itís both smart and beguiling, a perfect one-two punch.

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=8535&reviewer=385
originally posted: 05/13/05 10:27:53
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2004 Sundance Film Festival. For more in the 2004 Sundance Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2004 Chicago Film Festival. For more in the 2004 Chicago Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2004 CineVegas Film Festival. For more in the 2004 CineVegas Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2004 Seattle Film Festival. For more in the 2004 Seattle Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2004 Edinburgh Film Festival. For more in the 2004 Edinburgh Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2004 Starz Denver Film Festival. For more in the 2004 Starz Denver Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2004 Vancouver Film Festival. For more in the 2004 Vancouver Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2004 Toronto Film Festival. For more in the 2004 Toronto Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2004 Boston Film Festival. For more in the 2004 Boston Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2004 Mill Valley Film Festival. For more in the 2004 Mill Valley Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2005 Boston Sci-Fi Film Festival. For more in the 2005 Boston Sci-Fi Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2005 Victoria Independent Film & Video Festival. For more in the 2005 Victoria Independent Film & Video Festival series, click here.

User Comments

2/25/14 Leo Brim There are answers, you just need to dig deep 5 stars
12/28/13 Marty Never felt dumber in a movie but respect its originality 3 stars
8/09/13 Langano Wow, this movie really sucks. 1 stars
6/17/13 Mark M Good premise but let down by boring execution with unlikable characters. 2 stars
1/23/13 Mike Best (real) time travel movie ever. You'll watch it twice just to figure it out. 5 stars
5/20/11 Mr. Laag Very good, except that It demands at least a second view to fully understand it 4 stars
4/03/11 Vashek Vylet Good idea, but result is sloppy and dull 1 stars
1/19/11 sammyg mind blowing what an amazing film plus when did not understanding afilm mean its bad ? 5 stars
8/22/10 Peepers Sparing, austere, compelling tragedy. Worth repeated viewings. Stellar achievement. 5 stars
8/02/10 mendota "Parts from Wal-Mart," seriously? Mr. McKay was clearly in over his head with Primer. 5 stars
12/07/09 matt completely impenetrable, like wading through a labyrith of molasses in the dark 2 stars
4/07/09 Baloney Better than Timecrimes 5 stars
8/22/08 PAUL SHORTT A SMART, CLEVER TIME-TRAVEL GAME PLAYED ON AUDIENCES AND WITH THEM 4 stars
1/04/08 The Dude What was that all about. I don't really know, but I liked it!! 5 stars
6/05/07 consultation diet pills prescription without diets pill 3 stars
1/24/07 K. Sear The best time travel movie ever. It makes absolutely no concessions to the viewer. 5 stars
11/15/06 William Goss Ow. But a good ow. 4 stars
10/14/06 Oscar Sharp Fascinating movie, especially from a post-heideggerian perspective 4 stars
9/19/06 Mark Keogh Brilliant. A thinking persons film at long last. A movie that bears dozens of viewings 5 stars
9/13/06 Bitchflaps A masterpiece of shoestring budget film-making. Mesmerising! 5 stars
6/05/06 Dean Started off well, but I'd lost the plot by the end 3 stars
5/14/06 jeromebosch garbage 1 stars
12/19/05 patt Just Great 5 stars
11/17/05 Steven Haunschild Brilliant achievement. If you don't have praise for Primer, you don't understand it. 5 stars
10/08/05 justin pynchon+PKD on film; forces you to pay attention; mulholland dr was simple compared to this 5 stars
9/19/05 SY Very good for the director's first feature. Don't be put off if you don't understand. 4 stars
8/26/05 D Buckley This movie is not very good. 3 stars
8/19/05 Terri Sullivan reminded me of Nightingale in a Music Box 5 stars
8/19/05 ALDO hey, it's brilliant, because you don't get it, right? Wrong, but better than Garden State 3 stars
8/13/05 Lily What the hell happened? Attractive lead though. 2 stars
6/26/05 Indrid Cold Brilliant, fascinating, baffling. I didn't know they still made scifi like that. 5 stars
6/16/05 K. E. all over the place 2 stars
5/23/05 y2mckay Pretentious wankfest full of laughable technobabble and sloppy storytelling 2 stars
5/22/05 Cham Looked interesting, but it's utterly pointless, boring, and without any social value. 1 stars
10/31/04 jean-carotte Primer might be the most pretentious and stupid movie ever made. 1 stars
10/06/04 RW I need to see the last 5 minutes again (is this a marketing device to sell more tickets?) 4 stars
9/25/04 durden i got most of it... errr... some of it....i think i need to see 3 or 4 more times 5 stars
9/20/04 denny very enjoyable; needed subtitles to catch all the dialogue; must be seen again 4 stars
6/14/04 Stob this movie was the best independant movie I have ever seen 5 stars
6/06/04 van bullock wow! This was on the genius level 5 stars
6/02/04 Mellifluy It made think, what the *#@!? and then I walked out. 2 stars
4/13/04 Christian Abbott Is the absolute best time travel film I've ever seen. VERY original & thought-provoking 5 stars
3/29/04 bmo brilliant and whole heartedly original 5 stars
3/29/04 Megan Made NO sense to me, but I understand why it won the award (b/c it was made for so little) 2 stars
2/09/04 PIKE David Sullivan is the next Brad Pitt !! 5 stars
2/06/04 Kris M. I was confused from the start and the characters were not engaging. YUCK. 2 stars
2/06/04 ann I can't believe this won the jury award for Sundance. 1 stars
2/01/04 bill sullivan great. 5 stars
1/30/04 Angela Hehner Wow! Can't wait till it's theatre arrival 5 stars
1/29/04 Josef Wells Great Movie. If you have the brains to follow it, you will love it. 5 stars
1/28/04 Rod Barnes An excellent movie... it makes you pay attention the entire time. 5 stars
1/28/04 Matt Smith Great Movie!!! 5 stars
1/27/04 Nancy Dredcoe A $7000 film competes with multi-million dollar films. Says it all. 5 stars
1/27/04 Jon Casey I have much respect for Mr. Carruth. this is the first fim he's EVER made, with little $$ 5 stars
1/27/04 Bob Maplethorpe Absolutely brilliant! 5 stars
1/27/04 Billy Chowder I can't wait to see this Directors' next movie. Amazing 5 stars
1/27/04 Trevor Can't believe this won best film at Sundance 1 stars
1/26/04 John Beakley I thought the movie was very well done and the story line hid the ending well 5 stars
1/26/04 Joe Horn It won Sundance BITCH! 5 stars
1/24/04 David Joyner An excellent story ... don't be misled by the reviewer's narrow minded idea of a good story 5 stars
1/23/04 Neal Dutton Loved it -- from a non geeks perspective -- acting and actors very natural 5 stars
1/22/04 brent kinder I thought it worked, considering what Shane was working with. 4 stars
1/22/04 John Peters Truly unique... refreshing and thought provoking. 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  08-Oct-2004 (PG-13)
  DVD: 19-Apr-2005

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast