More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 6.76%
Worth A Look: 18.92%
Pretty Bad: 13.51%
Total Crap: 17.57%

6 reviews, 38 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Unity of Heroes by Jay Seaver

Hanagatami by Jay Seaver

Predator, The by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Rob Gonsalves

Madeline's Madeline by Jay Seaver

Won't You Be My Neighbor? by Rob Gonsalves

Brothers' Nest by Jay Seaver

Mandy by Peter Sobczynski

Gonjiam: Haunted Asylum by Jay Seaver

Maquia: When the Promised Flower Blooms by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Walking Tall (2004)
[] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"A big, dumb movie about a big, dumb guy"
2 stars

"Walking Tall" is said to be "inspired by a true story," but that's a stretch. In reality, it was inspired by the 1973 film of the same name, and THAT movie was inspired by a true story. What actually happened to Sheriff Buford Pusser bears only passing resemblance to what occurs in this shallow, violent remake.

The original film, which I have not seen, starred Joe Don Baker as the Tennessee lawman. A user-submitted plot summary at the Internet Movie Database says Pusser "(fights) corruption in his county with a four-foot-long wooden club. When the criminals attack his family, Buford shoots a whorehouse manager in the head and runs hillbilly gangsters over with his car." From this description alone, and in particular its reference to "hillbilly gangsters," I can tell you I like the original better than the remake.

But first things first. The remake stars The Rock instead of Joe Don Baker, calls him Chris Vaughn instead of Buford Pusser, and sets it in a rural Washington county instead of Tennessee (though most of the events make you think, "Shouldn't this be happening in the South?"). Maybe they thought audiences wouldn't believe a non-white man being named "Buford," and maybe they thought we wouldn't buy a person of color being elected sheriff in a tiny Southern town.

Whatever the reasons, we're in the Northwest now, and Chris Vaughn has just returned home after eight years in the army. He is disturbed to see his once-tranquil town having turned a bit seedy. In his absence, the lumber mill was closed by its owner, silver-spoon Jay Hamilton (Neal McDonough), who subsequently opened a casino instead. The police, led by wussy Sheriff Watkins (Michael Bowen), look the other way whenever there's crime involving the casino, because with the mill closed, it's the town's major source of revenue. Some of the locals are doing drugs, too, including Chris' little brother Pete (Khleo Thomas). As Chris' best friend Ray (Johnny Knoxville) puts it, "This ain't home anymore."

Chris, who is both hot-headed and self-righteous, is enraged to discover the casino using loaded dice at the craps table. He makes a fuss, which results in a major skirmish with casino security, which results in some of Hamilton's top henchmen doing a number on Chris with a box cutter. The cops buy the casino's version of the story, the one that says Chris kinda started the fight. Revenge plans foment.

Then Pete almost OD's on crystal meth he got from the casino security guys, and Chris goes ballistic. He concludes Hamilton must be selling drugs out of his casino -- an odd business plan considering, as Hamilton himself points out, the casino is plenty profitable on its own without adding drug trafficking to the menu. Chris grabs a block of wood and smashes up the casino, breaks some security guards' arms, and beats a few others to within an inch of their lives.

That's where the movie starts losing me: Chris is thoroughly unjustified in his actions. Even if he KNEW Hamilton was behind the drug thing, which he doesn't, the movie has still taken a shortcut in having him seek this kind of revenge so early. Are we really to believe the local cops wouldn't do anything about DRUG TRAFFICKING in a small-town casino? DRUG TRAFFICKING, people! It's not loaded dice or too-nude pole dancers. Chris doesn't even try legal routes, though. He had one bad experience with the sheriff -- back when he tore the casino apart the first time, also only semi-justified -- and decided they were useless. Sorry, but I'm not buyin' it.

I'm buyin' it even less when Chris is charged with all the crimes he committed there in the casino (vandalism, assault, etc.), fires his lawyer mid-trial, and represents himself -- which he does by offering a rousing speech to the jury about how he had to fight for his hometown, at which point the jury finds him not guilty -- EVEN THOUGH HE IS CLEARLY GUILTY -- and then he gets elected as the new sheriff. It's one of the most outrageously unbelievable series of events I've ever seen in a movie.

This is a classic example of a film assuming we will be on the side of its protagonist just BECAUSE he's the protagonist. In fact, Chris behaves like a big, dumb animal, taking the law into his own hands at the slightest provocation, abusing his power egregiously once he becomes sheriff. (He still has to take down Hamilton once and for all, you see.)

Part of the problem is that we're never given much indication that the town is as bad off as Chris seems to think it is. We see one or two people doing drugs, we see that Chris' ex-girlfriend Deni (Ashley Scott) has become a stripper, and we see the lumber mill has shut down. That's it. The film's only 77 minutes long; I wonder if additional scenes were cut that would have better established the town's downward spiral and Chris' frustration over it.

Since this is a guy movie, the men generally get even with each other by vandalizing one another's automobiles. (What better way to emasculate someone than to wreck the thing he bought as proof of what a man he is?) Being a guy movie also means that the casino strippers are shown amply, and that there is plenty of gunfire in the finale.

I'm able to enjoy certain moments and images in the film on a visceral level. Johnny Knoxville has the right kick-back attitude for his role, a gunfight held in the Vaughn family living room is funny, and obviously it's entertaining to see stuff getting blown up or torn apart, like when Letterman drops watermelons off the roofs of tall buildings. But I can't enjoy the movie as a whole. It's too illogical and superficial, and it's impossible for me to get behind the actions of its central character.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 04/03/04 16:41:04
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

9/16/17 morris campbell walking out boring as fuck 1 stars
1/04/16 Charles Tatum So far removed from orig, I can't believe they call this a "remake." 3 stars
10/23/15 david froman average action flick 3 stars
9/17/12 roscoe one of the rock's worst 2 stars
8/05/10 Eveline not good boring 1 stars
7/28/10 action movie fan silly imitation of much better 1974 film-joe don baker was much better 2 stars
9/20/09 Nifty Swift Lizzy Lame Ass 'Rock For Brainz' really is a joke! Put that eyebrow down jerk... 1 stars
8/13/08 Brenda If your friend owns it borrow it good. otherwise meh 3 stars
4/16/07 johnnyfog The Rock looks silly, but I liked the other characters. 3 stars
2/23/07 Caz Amazing action, great acting! 5 stars
11/19/06 R.W.Welch Not quite up to the 70's schlock classic, but OK. 3 stars
11/16/06 David Pollastrini not great, not terrible 4 stars
10/16/06 james woooooooo 5 stars
8/14/06 Sharon this movie was pretty good! and Quigley johnny knoxville is not an annoying sidekick! bitch 4 stars
4/02/06 JRE where's the point? 3 stars
9/02/05 Tom Burns A very cool movie. The rock is awesome! 5 stars
5/27/05 Quigley completely devoid of anything good. mindless sex, annoying sidekicks, and bull-crap clique 1 stars
4/12/05 scott einig bull-crap at its highest! it can't get lower, folks 1 stars
4/09/05 B Kniprath It is hard to remake a movie from 30 years ago. 4 stars
3/29/05 indrid cold Actually not that bad if you go in with low expectations. 3 stars
1/16/05 keithers.. The Rock was always a better actor then he was a wrestler 3 stars
12/25/04 Freddy lame ending. like that white dude could give the rock so much trouble 2 stars
10/17/04 Dan Good movie, loved the action sequences, especially the shotgun one with knoxville :D 4 stars
10/04/04 Amy Carter best movie I've seen this year!!! 5 stars
4/28/04 Lona Collins the movie was pretty good a little short but thats alright, because I am a huge rock fan! 4 stars
4/27/04 4x4 Wife dragged me to it instead of 50 First Dates. Can't complain to much. 3 stars
4/15/04 rojo The Rock is better than this. 3 stars
4/10/04 Bob Brady entertaining, lot of action good flick 3 stars
4/08/04 lucas good movie not best but worth a look 4 stars
4/08/04 KingNeutron Rock gets better with each film, but Knoxville almost steals the show 3 stars
4/07/04 PiaHawk the rock is so hot, i dont care wat he does. if he just stood there, i would have loved i! 5 stars
4/06/04 Krysta Buttons the movie was definatley a boys movie, to much violence for me thank you. 1 stars
4/05/04 taohgist The Rock is a wrastler, always will be, the story is good, 20 years ago 4 stars
4/04/04 Randy Blah 2 stars
4/03/04 Jiz Good but forgettable. Rundown had better action, but it also had SWS and that monkey scene 3 stars
4/01/04 Ayatolla of Rockinrolla Not as good as Rundown, but Rock and Knox connection were very good 3 stars
3/28/04 Christina saw a free screening last week. not bad. 4 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  02-Apr-2004 (PG-13)
  DVD: 28-Sep-2004



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast