More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.25

Awesome: 0%
Worth A Look: 12.5%
Average: 0%
Pretty Bad87.5%
Total Crap: 0%

1 review, 2 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Revenge of the Green Dragons by Jay Seaver

Birdman by Peter Sobczynski

John Wick by Peter Sobczynski

Blue Room, The by Jay Seaver

Cat and the Canary, The (1927) by Jay Seaver

#Stuck by Jay Seaver

Fury (2014) by Jay Seaver

Book of Life, The (2014) by Jay Seaver

Golden Era, The by Jay Seaver

Maze Runner, The by Daniel Kelly

subscribe to this feed


Stitch: The Movie!
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by David Cornelius

"Occasionally fun, mostly just obligatory."
2 stars

Before “Lilo & Stitch” even hit theaters, Disney was already hard at work on both a sequel and a TV series. You’d think that was a sign of arrogance - after all, how could they be so sure the movie would be enough of a hit to warrant such follow-ups? But remember, this is Disney, the place where every movie, popular or otherwise, has been getting sequels, and most of the characters have been getting TV shows as well. It’s not arrogance as much as it is a case of “well, that’s what we always do.”

The sequel is “Stitch! The Movie,” and it’s less a worthy sequel than it is a cheap set-up for the TV show, a pilot episode disguised as a direct-to-video movie. The back-to-back production does allow for a few improvements over the usual Disney sequel problems; the animation is better than usual (not as rushed, not as cheap), the entire cast has returned (instead of the usual Disney studio regulars hired as replacements on such projects), and the picture feels livelier, less like a soulless, “mandatory” project.

It is missing a great deal of the original movie’s heart, though. That one was a cute tale of misfits finding family, with lovable characters and a few memorable moments. This one’s more sitcom-y, less endearing, a little bland. That one saw Disney trying for something new in terms of animation style, storyline, and character. This one sees those new things being reshaped into more traditional stuff.

The premise of “Stitch!” (and, by default, the upcoming show) is that mad scientist Jumba (voiced again by David Ogden Stiers) has smuggled his previous 625 genetic experiments to Earth in “unactivated” form. Looking like marbles, these experiments will spring to full size life once dipped in water.

For “Stitch!,” Jumba is kidnapped by an old rival who wants the experiments for himself, and Lilo and her blue alien buddy decide the best way to save him is to activate one of the experiments. Things don’t go as planned, and soon a Gremlin-like beast is zipping around Hawaii, sucking up all the electricity.

Experiment 625 also gets activated, and it turns out he’s just like Stitch, only yellow and lazy. Sounding like Gilbert Gottfried doing a Danny DeVito impression, 625 spends most of his time talking about bologna sandwiches. Kids may find this very funny. I didn’t. (More importantly, neither did my daughter.)

The saving grace of “Stitch!” comes from Kevin McDonald, returning as the nerdish alien Pleakly. McDonald is a natural for comic voice-over acting, and here he earns every laugh. (There’s a great bit where Pleakly starts phoning every planet alphabetically, starting with Planet Aaaaaaaaa.)

But these laughs don’t come often enough, and while “Stitch!” will entertain the tykes for an hour, it’s not memorable enough to make it a keeper. It’s better than “Cinderella II” and the like, but it still feels less like a film and more like a product. Sure, you might want to see this to get a headstart on the TV show, but if the TV show’ll be anything like this, why bother?

link directly to this review at http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=9078&reviewer=392
originally posted: 08/25/05 10:07:05
[printer] printer-friendly format  
For more in the Direct To Video Sequels series, click here.

User Comments

2/09/07 Soranos I really didn't think this movie was as good as the original. 2 stars
3/27/04 Sean Scanlan One star better than the oringinal 4 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  26-Aug-2003 (G)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2014, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast