More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 0%
Worth A Look: 0%
Average: 0%
Pretty Bad77.78%
Total Crap: 22.22%

1 review, 3 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Vox Lux by Peter Sobczynski

Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse by Peter Sobczynski

Vox Lux by alejandroariera

Parallel (2018) by Jay Seaver

Witch: Part 1 - The Subversion, The by Jay Seaver

Lôi Báo by Jay Seaver

Bohemian Rhapsody by Rob Gonsalves

Fireworks (2017) by Jay Seaver

Knuckleball (2018) by Jay Seaver

Roma (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed

[] Buy posters from this movie
by Scott Weinberg

"Another genre-stew, featuring a who's-who of B-movie stardom."
2 stars

For every big-budget FX flick that hits the multiplexes, you'll find at least a half-dozen copies, ripoffs and retreads populating the video stacks and hiding on the late night cable channels. These films are usually comprised of hastily written and insipid screenplays, special effects that recall the Krofft Brothers' Land of the Lost, atrocious production values, and Casper Van Dien or Lance Henriksen.

In nearly every instance, the DVD cover art is the most compelling thing about the flick and you'll end up humiliated that you have to bring a third-rate version of Anaconda back to Blockbuster where all the movie nerds will snicker at you.

Which brings up Scorcher. Blatantly inspired by such modern classics as The Core and Armageddon, Scorcher is about as low-rent and derivative as a knock-off can possibly be - which is both a good thing and bad. But mostly bad.

Apparently the Chinese goverment is all to blame here, as their illegal nuclear testing has somehow unhinged some underwater fault-lines below California. The only way the Earth can be saved from incineration? Well, the detonation of a nuclear bomb in downtown Los Angeles, of course! Needless to say we have a swaggering hero, a fetching lady doctor, her brilliant Daddy scientist and a generic gaggle of soon-to-be-sidekicks all on the case. Any of this sounding familiar yet?

I could rattle off the non-stop parade of inanity, beginning with a subplot that sees ALL of L.A.'s citizens quietly moved out of town within 24 hours and ending with the Daddy/daughter schmear of "Oh my god they're actually trying to instill some actual DRAMA into this astonishingly silly disaster flick!"...but what's the point? Anyone who voluntarily drops four bucks to rent this one most likely already knows what they're in for: cinema cheese of the highest order.

Heck, it's not hard to have a minimally good time with a B-movie that delivers the ensemble of Mark Dacascos, John Rhys-Davies, G.W. Bailey and Rutger Hauer (as the President!)... but Scorcher is only "good stupid fun" in short bursts. What starts out as a gleefully obvious rehash of all the disaster-flick cliches we all know and love slowly turns into a flick with very few ideas... which is weird considering the stunning amount of "source material" there is out there. In other words, the set-up is compelling and fun, but the farther you get into Scorcher the less interested you become. A wholesale ripoff can still be entertaining... but not if it's just plain old boring.

Scorcher is of questionable note to film freaks for its perpetual use of stock footage from other films. As if it's not transparent enough that Scorcher is a pastiche of six earlier (and considerably more expensive) movies, scattered throughout this fool's epic you'll find snippets of Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Daylight and Volcano (or maybe it was Dante's Peak; all you volcano movies look alike to me.) So we've now come to the point in the evolution of cinema in which studios release NEW movies that are largely comprised (both figuratively and literally) of earlier movies. And people buy them.

I digress. "Scorcher" is quite simply not worthy of such extensive contemplation. If you dig C-grade cable-flick cheese (or the name Rutger Hauer means you'll see the movie regardless), then you could certainly opt for a less entertaining than this one.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 05/02/04 18:57:10
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

1/03/13 Fabian Absolutely awful....Honestly...This is a really bad film.... 1 stars
10/15/10 Clare Pile of poo 1 stars
2/27/06 ALBERT you're right!i've seen it only for rutger. 2 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  04-Oct-2002 (R)



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast