eFilmCritic Forum Index eFilmCritic
Community Forum
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Post new topic   Reply to topic    eFilmCritic Forum Index -> Off-Topic Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kand El
HBS Monkey
HBS Monkey

Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 1684
Location: New York

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:01 pm    Post subject: F- YEAH! Reply with quote

Associated Press
Broadcasters Win FCC Expletive Dispute
By LARRY NEUMEISTER 06.05.07, 8:56 AM ET

An appeals court said a new federal policy against accidentally aired profanities on TV and radio was invalid, noting that vulgar language had become so common that even President Bush has been heard using expletives.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday in favor of a Fox Television-led challenge to the policy and returned the case to the Federal Communications Commission to let the agency try to explain how its policy was not "arbitrary and capricious." The court said it doubted the FCC could.

The broadcasters had asked the appeals court last year to invalidate the FCC's conclusion that profanity-laced broadcasts on four shows were indecent, even though no fines were issued. The FCC said the "F-word" in any context "inherently has a sexual connotation" and can be subject to enforcement action.

The appeals court said some of the FCC's explanations for its new policy, reversing a more lenient policy in place for nearly three decades, were "divorced from reality."

The court noted that even President Bush was heard one day telling British Prime Minister Tony Blair that the United Nations needed to "get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this s---."

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin told The Associated Press that the ruling will make it difficult to impose fines for indecency.

"Practically, this makes it difficult to go forward on a lot of the cases that are in front of us," he said. An appeal was being considered, he said.

The FCC found its ban was violated by a Dec. 9, 2002, broadcast of the Billboard Music Awards in which singer Cher used the phrase "F--- 'em" and a Dec. 10, 2003, Billboard awards show in which reality show star Nicole Richie said, "Have you ever tried to get cow s--- out of a Prada purse? It's not so f------ simple."

In a majority opinion written by Judge Rosemary Pooler, the appeals court questioned whether the FCC's indecency test could survive First Amendment scrutiny.

"We are sympathetic to the networks' contention that the FCC's indecency test is undefined, indiscernible, inconsistent and consequently unconstitutionally vague," she wrote.

Fox Broadcasting praised the ruling, saying "government regulation of content serves no purpose other than to chill artistic expression in violation of the First Amendment." It said viewers can decide appropriate viewing content for themselves, using parental control technologies.

The new policy was put in place after a January 2003 NBC broadcast of the Golden Globes awards show, in which U2 lead singer Bono uttered the phrase "f------ brilliant."

FCC Commissioner Michael J. Copps said the decision was disappointing to him and millions of parents but "doesn't change the FCC's legal obligation to enforce the indecency statute."

"So any broadcaster who sees this decision as a green light to send more gratuitous sex and violence into our homes would be making a huge mistake," Copps said. "The FCC has a duty to find a way to breathe life into the laws that protect our kids."

Associated Press writer John Dunbar in Washington also contributed to this report.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HBS Monkey
HBS Monkey

Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 1022
Location: Cambridge, MA

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Someone needs to explain to me why the FCC does more than make sure two broadcasters don't try to use the same frequency in the same area.

Anyway, I'm not sure this ruling will have much effect - it just requires the FCC to review procedures, and might have the effect of them becoming more "vigilant" and fining anything.
Blogs: Jay's Movie Blog, Transplanted Life, The Trading Post
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    eFilmCritic Forum Index -> Off-Topic Chat All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group