More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 4.4%
Worth A Look: 10.99%
Average: 19.78%
Pretty Bad: 28.57%
Total Crap36.26%

6 reviews, 55 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Daniel Isn't Real by Jay Seaver

Midsommar by Rob Gonsalves

Blood on Her Name by Jay Seaver

Parasite (2019) by Peter Sobczynski

American Fighter by Jay Seaver

Moon in the Hidden Woods, The by Jay Seaver

Homewrecker (2019) by Jay Seaver

Gemini Man by Jay Seaver

Pain and Glory by Peter Sobczynski

Rusalka (aka The Siren), The by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Stepford Wives, The (2004)
[] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"The battle of the sexes rages on, dully."
3 stars

The Internet Movie Database classifies "The Stepford Wives" as "comedy/drama/thriller," and I suppose that's part of the film's problem: It doesn't know what it is. It's a comedy mostly, but not a very funny one, and it's too broad to be taken seriously as drama, and I don't recall ever being thrilled by it. Yet it has components of all of those -- dialogue that should have been funny, scenes that ought to be dramatic, and elements that might have been thrilling if we didn't already know all the surprises.

The 1975 film of which it is a remake was altogether serious, about a town where the housewives have been replaced by perfectly obedient and subservient robots. The new film has the same basic story, but plays it for laughs and changes some key plot points. I suppose feminism has come so far since 1975 that the idea of people behaving outrageously sexist is much funnier than it was then. Then, it was still relatively normal for men to expect their wives to stay home and to have their martinis waiting for them after a long day at the office. Now, the protagonist knows immediately that something is wrong when she sees that sort of behavior. "What is this?" she must be thinking. "1975?"

Anyway, she is Joanna Eberhard (Nicole Kidman), a high-powered Manhattan TV executive who has suffered a nervous breakdown and retreated to quaint Stepford, Conn., to live a quiet life with her husband Walter (Matthew Broderick) and their two little-seen children. Joanna is perplexed by the women in Stepford, who all have old-fashioned hairdos and wear June Cleaver dresses even when they're working out. The women are all beautiful, too, while their husbands are exceedingly average.

Her only new friends are her two fellow outcasts: Bobbie Markowitz (Bette Midler), a shlumpy author ("I Love You, But Please Die" was her book about her mother) who refuses to assume any traditional female roles; and Roger Bannister (Roger Bart), a gay man living in Stepford with his life partner. Joanna, Bobbie and Roger quickly become girlfriends, all suspecting that something odd is going on around here, but wanting to give the Stepford way of life a try, too. Who knows, maybe wearing an apron and baking muffins all day will cure Joanna of the blues.

Wisely, the movie reveals early that the women have been turned into robots. Everyone in the audience knows that, of course, having seen the original, or at least having heard the term "Stepford wife" used in conversation (I've seen it used in reference to First Lady Laura Bush more than once).

Ah, but what to do then? The original had Stepford's secret as a surprise later in the film, so there was suspense and intrigue as Joanna snooped around looking for answers. The 2004 Joanna still snoops, but we already know what she'll find. The screenplay, by Paul Rudnick ("Isn't She Great," "In & Out"), ought to offer us plenty of comedy in the meantime, but instead settles for whimsy punctuated by a few funny moments. Most of those are provided by Broadway's Roger Bart -- ironic, considering an out-and-comfortable gay character doesn't even belong in the movie, which is all about traditional male and female roles. (I doubt a private community run by conservative, old-fashioned men would let a gay couple move in anyway.)

Several of the performances are fun, particularly in the film's first half. You've got Glenn Close as Stepford's bubbly matriarch Claire Wellington, Christopher Walken as her husband, and Jon Lovitz playing Bette Midler's husband. Matthew Broderick is likable as ever -- his role was originally for John Cusack, and it suits both men's natural affability -- and even stony Nicole Kidman comes off as personable.

In the second half, much of the fun wears off as the story wears thin. On-set problems between director Frank Oz and various cast members are already legendary, and the film was sent back for re-shoots, which is never a good sign. Plus, the characters get split up for various plot reasons, and thus the banter is gone. Once the movie has to focus on its "thriller" elements, it has absolutely no idea what to do.

link directly to this review at
originally posted: 06/17/04 09:43:11
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

8/06/08 Screwball It was okay for a sunday afternoon 3 stars
8/24/07 Matt Forgettable fluff with a few amusing moments. Wait for it on TV. 3 stars
2/16/07 Vip Ebriega Really funny parody of a classic tale of horror. 4 stars
11/11/06 David Pollastrini boring, dull, etc. 1 stars
10/08/06 isis ok... 3 stars
6/08/06 Peggy Doty GOOD REMAKE OF AN OLD MOVIE 4 stars
5/22/06 Diane P very very bad and disappointing 2 stars
11/22/05 Kurtis J. Beard Atrocious. Walken is even bad. Didn't see that coming. 1 stars
10/27/05 deadwiz I found it quite funny. Nothing special though. 3 stars
10/20/05 odditie Survivable 3 stars
10/19/05 the untrained eye At least the original had Katherine Ross' boobies. 1 stars
8/26/05 Nick Worst movie ever! Are they robots or implant victims? Why was there a Nicole Kidman Robot? 1 stars
4/30/05 alice stupid, boring, loved the first one this one sucks 1 stars
1/12/05 Tom Benton A brainless and simple remake that can be enjoyable. 3 stars
11/15/04 Gabby Why why why why? What's the point? What a waste of celuloid! 1 stars
10/23/04 R Smith Film should have attacked bullies and wife beaters. 1 stars
9/27/04 alicia to put it eloquently: it sucked 1 stars
9/09/04 farwonth Maybe one or two laughs, the rest ...what the f#$% 2 stars
9/08/04 Gary Newton technicolour battle of the sexes,well acted but just a tad cheesy 3 stars
9/08/04 Wes Luther C'mon valerie hart. This could put an end to one's being a fan of Nicole! 1 stars
9/01/04 Wanda Ruhr Needed Ashley Judd in it. Then we'd have been warned that it is atrocious. 1 stars
8/29/04 Tiffany Faye Hawthorne C'mon K Man, WATERWORLD is a masterpiece compared to this braindead harpy vomit! 1 stars
8/28/04 K Man just as shi--y as Waterworld 1 stars
8/26/04 Maureen McDevitt It had some pretty funny lines... but totally missed the point of the original. 3 stars
8/24/04 Millie Maelstrom Insults men, women, Christians, Jews alike. Blames victims. Real harpy turd of a movie! 1 stars
8/16/04 McGraw Bad, bad, bad...a totall mess of a film. 1 stars
8/07/04 Alien assassin Don't you dare do this to "Westworld", Mr. Oz !!! 1 stars
8/01/04 valerie hart wotch it for nicole if ur a fan of hers uwill luv the film if not its to light hearted 4 stars
8/01/04 Daniel Roemer This movie is wonderful and the ending is even better 5 stars
7/26/04 My Two Cents Very funny black comedy. But too short. Could have accom a few more scenes. 4 stars
7/24/04 Sandy Turynowicz confusing & not to good 2 stars
7/17/04 legend Where to being with this awful film...umm..a fire would be nice. Save your money. 1 stars
7/14/04 crystal Dood, Nicole Kidman... 5 stars
7/12/04 sd Such promise, such a mess. Set designers can hold head up, however. 2 stars
7/09/04 J Cadiramen Watch it for Nicole, and enjoy Bette to boot! A hoot! 5 stars
7/04/04 Carly I think this movie was way better than the first and Nicole Kidman is an amzing actress. 4 stars
6/27/04 Deanna Schlocky but so was the original movie. Message: we've gone to far to go back now. 4 stars
6/19/04 SF Glenn Close is the only thing worth watching. 3 stars
6/19/04 Carrielle I thought it wasthe best of the summer it ROCKED!!! 5 stars
6/19/04 Gray not one positive straight male is shown fuck this flick! 1 stars
6/19/04 Emily i didn't like it 2 stars
6/18/04 Ryan Nice 4 stars
6/18/04 Unanon My only funny theatre experience here was a lost toddler calling for her mommy. Seriously. 2 stars
6/16/04 Lola Awesome story Line but this remake was pathetic. It was pretentious and un-funny. 1 stars
6/16/04 Boyinthedesignerbubble The new cast was good, but the original was still far better. 3 stars
6/16/04 Marce It was light, fluffy and entertaining; extactly what it aimed to be and nothing more. 4 stars
6/15/04 Rex if you've seen the trailer, you've seen the movie 1 stars
6/15/04 Norm Hilarious!! 4 stars
6/14/04 roy Worthless 2 stars
6/14/04 The Talking Elbow Jason Oz, how come you only gave your dads movie 4 of 5 stars? 3 stars
6/14/04 Kelly Nicole Kidman's more concerned with her collagened lips and overacts -- it's distracting 3 stars
6/13/04 Anne Peterson tries to push a silly, watered-down feminist angle and just reinforces stereotypes 1 stars
6/12/04 dave go watch garfield, its better than this crap 1 stars
6/11/04 Jason Oz Support my dad! 4 stars
6/11/04 robert berkoff pass 2 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  11-Jun-2004 (PG-13)
  DVD: 09-Nov-2004



Directed by
  Frank Oz

Written by
  Paul Rudnick

  Nicole Kidman
  Matthew Broderick
  Bette Midler
  Glenn Close
  Christopher Walken
  Jon Lovitz

Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast